by Ralta (Ancient) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:42 pm
by Negros Island and the Visayan Region » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:35 am
by Tyrnica » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:39 am
by Ralta (Ancient) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 7:31 am
by Kustgebied » Mon Jun 27, 2016 7:52 am
by Tyrnica » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:58 am
Ralta wrote:I am still trying to work out the more basic kinks right now with my nation(Mainly around names).
The question becomes this: Do you want Ralta to be a land that borders you(More or less decided the mountain's weren't worth attempting to cross), or an island nation prime for the economic exploitation style of colonization?
by Ralta (Ancient) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:42 am
Tyrnica wrote:Ralta wrote:I am still trying to work out the more basic kinks right now with my nation(Mainly around names).
The question becomes this: Do you want Ralta to be a land that borders you(More or less decided the mountain's weren't worth attempting to cross), or an island nation prime for the economic exploitation style of colonization?
It's really a matter of Ralta's culture in comparison to, for example, my own. Tyrnica is a Germanic nation founded in 1266, so it would make absolutely no sense for the inhabitants to have avoided crossing a border for over four hundred years, nor would it be realistic for a culture like your own to exist right alongside mine.
However, if your nation was half a continent away – not an island, but not necessarily bordering other nations, per se, I think it could work. In a situation like that, I'd assume that your nation was essentially a realm bordered by mountains on all but one side – the ocean.
An island could also work, without too many problems. I do prefer the continental option, but as long as it's not the "uncrossed borders," then I'm all good.
by Tyrnica » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:17 am
Ralta wrote:Tyrnica wrote:
It's really a matter of Ralta's culture in comparison to, for example, my own. Tyrnica is a Germanic nation founded in 1266, so it would make absolutely no sense for the inhabitants to have avoided crossing a border for over four hundred years, nor would it be realistic for a culture like your own to exist right alongside mine.
However, if your nation was half a continent away – not an island, but not necessarily bordering other nations, per se, I think it could work. In a situation like that, I'd assume that your nation was essentially a realm bordered by mountains on all but one side – the ocean.
An island could also work, without too many problems. I do prefer the continental option, but as long as it's not the "uncrossed borders," then I'm all good.
I like the continent idea as well, so a load of mountain passes to reach a valuable metal.
Do we use a real world map for this, because I can't think of a good place, unless we do the Siberian mountains.
by Ralta (Ancient) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:25 am
Tyrnica wrote:Ralta wrote:I like the continent idea as well, so a load of mountain passes to reach a valuable metal.
Do we use a real world map for this, because I can't think of a good place, unless we do the Siberian mountains.
Ooh, that'd be nice. Rather than a big, forested valley enclosed by mountains, there's a lot of rugged, uncharted terrain interspersed with tranquil lakes and untouched forests . . . I like it.
When I first started out on NS, I used a real-world map, but I find that it limits creativity, and sets arbitrary boundaries for nations and terrain. I now use my own custom map, which allows me to have free reign over what my nation is, geographically as well as ethnically and politically . . . Basically, in every way. It also means I don't have to employ a world map, meaning that if an RP takes place on a landmass that my world map doesn't recognise . . . I don't have one, and therefore can travel to and from said landmass without bending the laws of spacetime.
You can use whatever you choose, but for something as unique as this, I'd advise creating your own map. You can dictate every bit of it, and you won't have to deal with the fact that the only body of water the Siberian mountains border is the largely frozen Arctic Ocean.
by Tyrnica » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:28 am
Ralta wrote:Tyrnica wrote:
Ooh, that'd be nice. Rather than a big, forested valley enclosed by mountains, there's a lot of rugged, uncharted terrain interspersed with tranquil lakes and untouched forests . . . I like it.
When I first started out on NS, I used a real-world map, but I find that it limits creativity, and sets arbitrary boundaries for nations and terrain. I now use my own custom map, which allows me to have free reign over what my nation is, geographically as well as ethnically and politically . . . Basically, in every way. It also means I don't have to employ a world map, meaning that if an RP takes place on a landmass that my world map doesn't recognise . . . I don't have one, and therefore can travel to and from said landmass without bending the laws of spacetime.
You can use whatever you choose, but for something as unique as this, I'd advise creating your own map. You can dictate every bit of it, and you won't have to deal with the fact that the only body of water the Siberian mountains border is the largely frozen Arctic Ocean.
Alright! I will begin work on a map in probably about an hour, entranced with Mount and Blade right now
by Ralta (Ancient) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:29 am
by Pillowlandia » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:42 am
Stasnov wrote:Small-to-medium sized professional, relatively high-tech and well funded military. Emphasis on flexible units at Brigade-Battalion level.
by Tyrnica » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:57 am
Pillowlandia wrote:If you want to make a map I just take the outlines of random RL nations, resize them and cut them a bit or as some bits.
And you are rather high quality than most brand new players, color me interested
by Ralta (Ancient) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 1:25 pm
by Ralta (Ancient) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:29 pm
by Tyrnica » Tue Jun 28, 2016 5:36 am
by Ralta (Ancient) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 7:15 am
Tyrnica wrote:So, if I understand the Ralta correctly, they are . . .
• Less primitive than Australian Aboriginals and Maōri.
• Respectful of animals in a similar way to Native Americans and Maōri.
• More primitive than Japanese cultures of the same era.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
If there are two warring factions, and one of them follows the Panther, that means that two animals, depending on which animal the opposing clan follows, will be without a clan. Is this intentional, or are there smaller clans that have perhaps pledged their allegiance to the larger ones?
Furthermore, you can see that my flag portrays a wolf. Would this invoke feelings of "these people must be wise," among the Ralta, or would they assume that the foreigners know nothing and it is merely a coincidence?
by Tyrnica » Tue Jun 28, 2016 7:26 am
Ralta wrote:Tyrnica wrote:So, if I understand the Ralta correctly, they are . . .
• Less primitive than Australian Aboriginals and Maōri.
• Respectful of animals in a similar way to Native Americans and Maōri.
• More primitive than Japanese cultures of the same era.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
If there are two warring factions, and one of them follows the Panther, that means that two animals, depending on which animal the opposing clan follows, will be without a clan. Is this intentional, or are there smaller clans that have perhaps pledged their allegiance to the larger ones?
Furthermore, you can see that my flag portrays a wolf. Would this invoke feelings of "these people must be wise," among the Ralta, or would they assume that the foreigners know nothing and it is merely a coincidence?
The leader follows the Panther; anyone within the Clan follow what they see as their calling. There would probably be a sense of foreboding for people who do not follow the wolf when they see your flag flying in the wind. It is fair to assume that Clans have more or less made vassal clans and subjugated others.
Your points are very much correct.
by Ralta (Ancient) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:33 am
Tyrnica wrote:Ralta wrote:
The leader follows the Panther; anyone within the Clan follow what they see as their calling. There would probably be a sense of foreboding for people who do not follow the wolf when they see your flag flying in the wind. It is fair to assume that Clans have more or less made vassal clans and subjugated others.
Your points are very much correct.
Oh, of course. I was reading the lower half of the leader's profile as if it were a clan-wide thing.
In your mind, will the "advanced societies" be trying to come through the mountains, or will they be able to sail around and, eventually, land on suitable settlement ground, only to discover later that people actually live in the area?
by Ralta (Ancient) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 5:00 pm
by Ralta (Ancient) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:46 pm
by Tyrnica » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:41 am
by Vulkata II » Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:44 am
Great Tawil wrote:The thing is I hate fighting. I just wanna draw flags and make friends
by Ralta (Ancient) » Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:52 am
Tyrnica wrote:I think the 18th or 19th century would be a good time. As per my own nation's history, however, I request that it doesn't take place in 1783, 1821 or 1852. Those are the times in which my nation would not care at all about colonialism and warring tribes on the other side of the world.
by Tyrnica » Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:18 am
Ralta wrote:Tyrnica wrote:I think the 18th or 19th century would be a good time. As per my own nation's history, however, I request that it doesn't take place in 1783, 1821 or 1852. Those are the times in which my nation would not care at all about colonialism and warring tribes on the other side of the world.
1730 work for you as the start date?
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Arakhkhar, Assassins BrotherHoodd, Champlania, European Federal Union, Russia and Collaborative States, Sons of Liberty
Advertisement