Genevia RP group(ooc Genevia ONLY!)

by **Allied Connurist States** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:17 pm

Anyone going to post? I'm looking at you DS.....
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=317307

by **Serrian** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:23 pm

WHY DOES THIS MOVE SO FAST

MY POST FROM A FEW PAGES BACK IS ALREADY BURIED

Recolor Alvior, Hanakoland, and Nadel please; the first two are puppet states of mine and the last one is a friend of mine who will post here once she returns from vacation.

by **Valaran** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:27 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Firewind wrote:Well then, it would appear A&B is back in charge. Had a big turnaround didn't you? And, players forbid, could A&B's map actually be considered the current Genevia map? Impossible!

[/dramatics]

I don't know about that. Genevievia is my idea which I have maintained for some time now, but those who gain my trust are free to help out with things like the map, etc.

Now, now. It should be balanced.

by **Allied Connurist States** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:40 pm

Deian salazar wrote:GUYYYYSSS?Helllooooo?

Hey.

by **Archeuland and Baughistan** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:41 pm

Serrian wrote:WHY DOES THIS MOVE SO FAST

MY POST FROM A FEW PAGES BACK IS ALREADY BURIED

Recolor Alvior, Hanakoland, and Nadel please; the first two are puppet states of mine and the last one is a friend of mine who will post here once she returns from vacation.

I've already put those in. Quite a while ago.

by **Archeuland and Baughistan** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:42 pm

@Serrian:

http://i.imgur.com/Nj4FH0j.png

by **Irav** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:45 pm

Deian salazar wrote:GUYYYYSSS?Helllooooo?

Oh hey ...

by **Valaran** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:47 pm

Just out of curiosity (and to help finish the map for now), are there any other requests?

by **Archeuland and Baughistan** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:47 pm

Irav wrote:
Deian salazar wrote:GUYYYYSSS?Helllooooo?

Oh hey ...

Afternoon!

So, Irav, how does it feel to be my neighbor? -raises eyebrows repeatedly-

by **Archeuland and Baughistan** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:52 pm

Deian salazar wrote:
Valaran wrote:Just out of curiosity (and to help finish the map for now), are there any other requests?

Can I have the dividor between Dew and The Papacy?

On second thought, to heck with Dewhurst's complaining, I'm giving the strip back to the Papacy.

http://i.imgur.com/b5SMq3l.png There.

If he wants to invade us, so be it. I'll call my allies if he does. He will learn some respect. Who's with me?

by **Valaran** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:53 pm

I'd rather we have peace until everything is sorted. Then let the situation deteriorate a we wish, but preferably not before as it can confuse things and make the conflict veer into OOC (arguably this is what happened the past few times).

Let's finalize everything first.

by **Valaran** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:57 pm

Deian salazar wrote:
Valaran wrote:I'd rather we have peace until everything is sorted. Then let the situation deteriorate a we wish, but preferably not before as it can confuse things and make the conflict veer into OOC (arguably this is what happened the past few times).

Agreed.

thanks

So, apart form the Papal states thingy (that can be a source of an RP a bit later).... are there any other map requests?

If not, is there anything else we need/want to resolve before restarting Genevian RPs?

by **Dewhurst-Narculis** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:59 pm

Valaran wrote:
Deian salazar wrote:Agreed.

thanks

So, apart form the Papal states thingy (that can be a source of an RP a bit later).... are there any other map requests?

If not, is there anything else we need/want to resolve before restarting Genevian RPs?

mhm, the removal of my northern neighbour, completely buggers up my doctrine for the region

by **Republic of Vietnam** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:59 pm

Valaran wrote:
Deian salazar wrote:Agreed.

thanks

So, apart form the Papal states thingy (that can be a source of an RP a bit later).... are there any other map requests?

If not, is there anything else we need/want to resolve before restarting Genevian RPs?

Uh...
WMDs are absolutely last resort? And must ask for consent before using them?

by **Tsarist Chernigov** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:59 pm

Firewind wrote:All hands, we have a MAP!

Can I have Rutthenia if it is not taken?

by **Serrian** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:00 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Serrian wrote:WHY DOES THIS MOVE SO FAST

MY POST FROM A FEW PAGES BACK IS ALREADY BURIED

Recolor Alvior, Hanakoland, and Nadel please; the first two are puppet states of mine and the last one is a friend of mine who will post here once she returns from vacation.

I've already put those in. Quite a while ago.

No, but I requested a quick recoloration and a removal of my name on Alvior, Hanakoland, and Nadel (though not the others). I want them recognized as separate states, not as colonies, especially Nadel since I don't even own it and I'm reserving it for a friend (who is unfortunately unavailable until monday or so)

by **Valaran** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:00 pm

Kool, let's solve all the stuff above before moving on.

by **Archeuland and Baughistan** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:01 pm

Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Valaran wrote:

thanks

So, apart form the Papal states thingy (that can be a source of an RP a bit later).... are there any other map requests?

If not, is there anything else we need/want to resolve before restarting Genevian RPs?

mhm, the removal of my northern neighbour, completely buggers up my doctrine for the region

Ethelgrad? Why on earth would we remove it?

by **Allied Connurist States** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:03 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
mhm, the removal of my northern neighbour, completely buggers up my doctrine for the region

Ethelgrad? Why on earth would we remove it?

May I ask what is the purpose for Ethelgrad's existence?

by **Valaran** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:04 pm

Allied Connurist States wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Ethelgrad? Why on earth would we remove it?

May I ask what is the purpose for Ethelgrad's existence?

Agreed. WE have other NPCs anyway.

Or at least why does it have to be there?

by **Archeuland and Baughistan** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:04 pm

Serrian wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
I've already put those in. Quite a while ago.

No, but I requested a quick recoloration and a removal of my name on Alvior, Hanakoland, and Nadel (though not the others). I want them recognized as separate states, not as colonies, especially Nadel since I don't even own it and I'm reserving it for a friend (who is unfortunately unavailable until monday or so)

Oh, I apologize, I didn't notice that completely. Here, is this better? http://i.imgur.com/4eaqtaK.png

by **Dewhurst-Narculis** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:04 pm

Allied Connurist States wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Ethelgrad? Why on earth would we remove it?

May I ask what is the purpose for Ethelgrad's existence?

Has none at all, except maybe a future holding of the crown

by **Archeuland and Baughistan** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:06 pm

Allied Connurist States wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Ethelgrad? Why on earth would we remove it?

May I ask what is the purpose for Ethelgrad's existence?

There are a variety of NPCs to provide variety, balance of power, and insurance against over-the-top imperialism (like me). They are also great for roleplay.

I could frankly care less if Dewhurst has access to the coast or not. He has access to two large bodies of water that are themselves connected to the ocean. If he wishes to invade Ethelgrad (which I would strongly oppose), he is free to do so. But I discourage it. He has plenty of territory.

by **Valaran** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:06 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Serrian wrote:
No, but I requested a quick recoloration and a removal of my name on Alvior, Hanakoland, and Nadel (though not the others). I want them recognized as separate states, not as colonies, especially Nadel since I don't even own it and I'm reserving it for a friend (who is unfortunately unavailable until monday or so)

Oh, I apologize, I didn't notice that completely. Here, is this better? http://i.imgur.com/4eaqtaK.png

Thanks Arch.

And about the other concerns:

agreed on the WMDs.

Rutthenia was already taken, right?

by **Dewhurst-Narculis** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:07 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Allied Connurist States wrote:May I ask what is the purpose for Ethelgrad's existence?

There are a variety of NPCs to provide variety, balance of power, and insurance against over-the-top imperialism (like me). They are also great for roleplay.

I could frankly care less if Dewhurst has access to the coast or not. He has access to two large bodies of water that are themselves connected to the ocean. If he wishes to invade Ethelgrad (which I would strongly oppose), he is free to do so. But I discourage it. He has plenty of territory.

*Get's the flag ready*

Genevia RP group(ooc Genevia ONLY!)

Who is online