Holy Marsh wrote:Aldar has been gone for two weeks. We can go ahead and do something. AFAIC, Endless Wartime can start up at any time. My army will be away.
GD is as ready as can be for this whole thing to start.
Advertisement
by Lamoni » Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:27 pm
Holy Marsh wrote:Aldar has been gone for two weeks. We can go ahead and do something. AFAIC, Endless Wartime can start up at any time. My army will be away.
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."
Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.
Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.
by Havensky » Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:19 pm
by Slekomania » Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:44 pm
Havensky wrote:My thread with Kraven (The Defiant Sky) is already up and running: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=315668
This will set Havensky up as a neutral party in the end. But first! Fireworks
by The greater Vakolicci Haven » Tue Oct 21, 2014 12:06 am
Ralkovian Grand Island wrote:The greater Vakolicci Haven wrote:Yes. However, we've had nothing from Kraven, Aldar, Azura, Ralk, Parth...and others?
I know that posts need to be of good quality, but people are sort of waiting to get started, so it might be worth moving it along a bit. Obviously, RL must take priority, so no pressure if something bad is going on in RL.
Parth, Scand, and I are currently discussing amongst ourselves what we're doing. We might be entirely separate from Einsatz, though we might participate at a later date. Currently we're still in discussion.
by The Black Plains » Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:51 pm
The greater Vakolicci Haven wrote:Ralkovian Grand Island wrote:
Parth, Scand, and I are currently discussing amongst ourselves what we're doing. We might be entirely separate from Einsatz, though we might participate at a later date. Currently we're still in discussion.
As you have very similar aims, it would make sense to coordinate our actions.
Come on...although the Haven's an anarchistic state that doesn't know the meaning of the word 'Security,' it doesn't smell that bad.
by The greater Vakolicci Haven » Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:33 am
by Morrdh » Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:38 am
The greater Vakolicci Haven wrote:Is this now a dead fish, or are we going to do something with this thread with or without Aldar?
by The greater Vakolicci Haven » Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:45 am
by The Nuclear Fist » Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:03 am
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by The greater Vakolicci Haven » Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:08 am
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Einsatz Coalition should invade Sondria.
Then we can all watch it fail miserably.
by Tiami » Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:54 am
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Einsatz Coalition should invade Sondria.
Then we can all watch it fail miserably.
The greater Vakolicci Haven wrote:Is this now a dead fish, or are we going to do something with this thread with or without Aldar?
by The greater Vakolicci Haven » Sun Oct 26, 2014 5:26 am
by Marquesan » Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:02 am
by Tiami » Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:05 am
Marquesan wrote:NS tells us Aldarminia's last login was 18 days ago. That makes him better than halfway to CTE. If, in nearly three weeks, he has not logged into NS when he is doubtless aware of his responsibility to forward Omnibellum to its opening moves, it is not because he has not had the time. While I think this was easy to see coming, (Omni was simply too ambitious for one man to carry off) it is no less frustrating or disappointing. From the Sondrian perspective, we have, again, been teased into believing we were actually going to be able to fight a war we have expected from one player or another for something like two years. What's frustrating is that the perennial "bad guys" seem to be the same guys over and over again, so you'll have to forgive us for sounding a -little- jaded about anyone's chances of actually carrying out an exterior invasion of the region. It would seem based on experience that there is nobody up to the task, possessing the level of organization, commitment or testicular fortitude to step up to the plate. I'd -love- for somebody to prove me wrong, but I believe that if I were to be proven wrong here, it would have happened already.
Am I saying Sondria is inviolable to exterior threats? Absolutely not. However, I am saying that the spinelessness we've seen from the creme of NS's aggressor nations seems indicative of an entire class of "villains" who talk a good game and don't have the minerals to carry their threatening and posturing into a properly organized and well-written RP thread.
Tl;dr: Come get some, Haven. You think you've got what it takes to make Sondria fail? We've heard it before from bigger and scarier nations.
by Marquesan » Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:08 am
by Tiami » Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:10 am
Marquesan wrote:There has been bad blood because we've been made to believe threads were actually going to get going and then fell flat on their faces when we were made to wait and wait and wait and wait. It's hardly baseless and I didn't say we were blameless, either. I did however say that none of the great big baddies has actually done what they said they were going to do. How am I to read it any other way?
by Marquesan » Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:13 am
by The greater Vakolicci Haven » Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:21 am
by The Black Plains » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:24 am
by Alexiandra » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:49 am
by Tiami » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:58 am
Marquesan wrote:I differ with you on that.
I can cite specific examples, if you'd like, but for the sake of this thread and the public nature of the forum, I'd prefer to leave nameless people nameless. I think we all know who I'm implicating here.
Edit: We'll talk on IRC. I have a few other tasks to carry out this morning, but I'll be on later.
by The Macabees » Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:04 pm
Alexiandra wrote:This seems to have turned into a "let's all stomp the smaller regions" thread.
by Delmonte » Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:06 pm
The Batorys wrote:The Delmontese like money, yeah, but they also like to throw down.
[b][color=#0000FF][background=red]United in Opposition to [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?t=303025]Liberate Haven[/url][/background][/color][/b]
[color=#FF0000][b]Mallorea and Riva should [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=303090]resign[/url][/b][/color]
by Tiami » Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:10 pm
Delmonte wrote:The Macabees wrote:
This thread is a good example of why a conflict of this scale needs to happen organically.
Because too much planning and organization is clearly the issue here.
This thread is an example of why people who don't actually want to write something shouldn't say they do. It's not hard. I didn't want to write in this. So I just didn't say that I did.
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: European Federal Union
Advertisement