NationStates

In an attempt to better organize the GIA IC thread please post any further OOC here.

Well I'd like to say that while I don't want the GIA to be seen as a violent alliance, I want GIA presence to be felt and to be taken into consideration whenever one of the members speaks out.

Kagetora wrote:Well I'd like to say that while I don't want the GIA to be seen as a violent alliance, I want GIA presence to be felt and to be taken into consideration whenever one of the members speaks out.

A wise point, e.g. moderation in all things.

Genrally, a member, due to the relative size of many of our alliance's nations, does have a good deal of ability to cause people to think twice.

I would like to have a threat level list to determine our alliance's stance against certain nation,like this:
5-Highly Dangerous
4-Dangerous
3-Threatening
2-Suspicious
1-Normal

Gc1mak wrote:I would like to have a threat level list to determine our alliance's stance against certain nation,like this:
5-Highly Dangerous
4-Dangerous
3-Threatening
2-Suspicious
1-Normal

I am up for this. It would allow members to watch out for certain nations and give members a higher sense of unity.

The Scandinvans wrote:

Kagetora wrote:Well I'd like to say that while I don't want the GIA to be seen as a violent alliance, I want GIA presence to be felt and to be taken into consideration whenever one of the members speaks out.

A wise point, e.g. moderation in all things.

Genrally, a member, due to the relative size of many of our alliance's nations, does have a good deal of ability to cause people to think twice.

That's true. I remember running an average awhile back, and it put the average population of member nations somewhere around 3 billion. Even so, I don't think most people even know who is in the GIA or what it is.

Xin Han wrote:

Gc1mak wrote:I would like to have a threat level list to determine our alliance's stance against certain nation,like this:
5-Highly Dangerous
4-Dangerous
3-Threatening
2-Suspicious
1-Normal

I am up for this. It would allow members to watch out for certain nations and give members a higher sense of unity.

Wouldn't it be easier to make a watchlist and blacklist? I mean, people in the "normal" category don't need the Alliance's attention. Those who are "highly dangerous" would probably be on a blacklist anyway.

I rarely use my original nation Hobbeebia because my population is somerwhere in the 13.04 billion mark. I would also be in favor of a Blacklist system over a threat indication for individual nation. I would perfer however a threat indication for hostile Alliances.

EDIT: I have Clan Princess that is free.

To clarify, I will make a diplomatic statement in the recent conflict, but I will not make a direct military intervention unless if there is an actual need to.

I am planning a campaign of expansion elsewhere.

The Monarchy in Dezania has been restored.

Altane wrote:The Monarchy in Dezania has been restored.

Heh?

Just letting you know after it was an Arab Republic, I assisted in the Monarchies restoration there.

Altane wrote:Just letting you know after it was an Arab Republic, I assisted in the Monarchies restoration there.

The war has yet to come to a conclusion.

Hey guy's. Things got busy as hell here. I'll try to be available more often from now on. So what's the current situation?

Still not very active. There was some military action some people were taking, and that's about it right now.

Well,after some argument over a PMT-FT nation,I wish to know can I be accepted,I play MT-Early PMT(Yeah I only played in one PMT rp that died out)

Post an application

I am more open to some PMT but not if its heavy. Things like an advanced warfighter system is ok, or some of Kravens stuff is ok, but not casual space travel. I have known some people on here to claim Halos UNSC was PMT. For me thats to much. I actually like not having an application like most alliances do. It seperates us from the masses. We instead base our acceptance based on the effort they put into asking.

Modern day Hobbeebia wrote:I am more open to some PMT but not if its heavy. Things like an advanced warfighter system is ok, or some of Kravens stuff is ok, but not casual space travel. I have known some people on here to claim Halos UNSC was PMT. For me thats to much. I actually like not having an application like most alliances do. It seperates us from the masses. We instead base our acceptance based on the effort they put into asking.

Gernally us oldies, inlcuding you Hobbeebia, have accepted Kraven work as the line.

I'm glad that other nations accepted me, and would like to get involved within this alliance, is there some sort of GIA forums where it is possible to see what the GIA is involved in and what it is doing?

Blouman Empire wrote:I'm glad that other nations accepted me, and would like to get involved within this alliance, is there some sort of GIA forums where it is possible to see what the GIA is involved in and what it is doing?

Nope. I have tried multiple forums and it gets to troublesome to make one. E.g. I no longer care for Invisionfree.

Forums are typically useless anyway.

Scandinvans, was the agreement made public yet?

Stoklomolvi wrote:Forums are typically useless anyway.

Scandinvans, was the agreement made public yet?

No. But, I enforce them. TG heading your way.

agreement?

Altane wrote:agreement?

Yeah, we, by we I mean I, have agreed to a basic none aggression where we shall not enter into direct conflict with Stok or his little alliance.

Which makes things dificult for some of us. *cough*

Though I would like input, if not the final say, on any agreement I am forced to abide by.