by Gloria Regis » Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:59 pm
by The Guangxi Clique » Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:53 pm
by Gloria Regis » Thu Feb 11, 2016 2:11 am
Guidelines for Male Feminist Collective Party Members
Preamble As a class, men have developed an entrenched system of power called patriarchy in order to naturalize exploitation of women’s bodies, labor, time, children, and so on. Patriarchy consists of an interlocking system of social, economic, political, legal, and cultural structures designed to oppress women for the benefit of men. This system provides men with privileges in every aspect of our lives; we are the direct beneficiaries. As men, we often mistake these privileges for natural rights.
It is not enough for us to be what has formerly been called good men. It is not enough to personally refrain from exploiting women. It is not enough for us to be personally conscientious and respectful to women. It is not enough to maintain equality in our own relationships with women. While all of those things are important, abstaining personally from outright oppressive behavior doesn't challenge The Patriarchy as a system of power. Basic decency commands that we work alongside women to uproot and dismantle this entire patriarchal system– within ourselves, within our groups and communities, and within institutions and the culture at large.
The following guidelines are to encourage male activists in the Feminist Collective to change their behavior and to better ally themselves with women. As male party members we have been socialized into a culture of domination, and are just as liable to carry, practice, and reproduce patriarchy. Remember: being an ally is an ongoing process rather than a title one earns; it must always be defined by women, who will determine by the daily actions and behaviors of a man how much of an ally he really is.
1. Learn to listen: Learn to be silent, hold back, be humble, and to listen to women's voices. Be aware of subtle ways that you may devalue women or treat them unfairly.Do not talk down to women or interrupt them.
2. Accept female leadership: We must follow the lead of women, and prioritize issues that are brought forth by women or concern women. The culture we want to move into will be women-centered: we should move in this direction ourselves. Make it a priority to have women in positions of power, and to encourage new woman leaders.
3. Relinquish authority: It is inappropriate for us to speak as authorities on subjects that women directly experience. As men we do not and cannot understand these experiences. If we are to speak at all on such subjects, it should only be after women or if women ask us to do so, and never from our own perspective.
4. Remove male centered language: We must challenge our own patriarchal behavior, such as patterns of silencing or devaluing women, and using patriarchal language (such as hate speech, jokes based on humiliation and degradation, and male-identified generalities
5. Do not objectify: Do not use the sex industry in any way. Do not slut shame women or try to in any way control their sexual decisions. Always assume that the default answer to any expression of male sexual desire is 'no' until you have heard explicity otherwise.
6. Challenge entitlement: Women do not owe men anything, including a smile, a conversation, a hug, a relationship, or intimacy of any kind. Men do not have the right to take up space at the expense of women’s comfort or personal boundaries.
7. Challenge male dominated spaces: Men's clubs, male exclusive areas are sources of male domination. Challenge them, do not join them, discourage family and friends from them.
8. Do not derail: Men are not oppressed. Men's concerns are private, personal, not historic and systemic.
9. Believe women: We must familiarize ourselves with issues affecting women, and with feminist theory and history. We should not expect to be spoon-fed a feminist understanding.
10. Accept that male violence is a problem: Within the dominant culture males are perpetrators of harassment and violence. Many women are survivors of this violence – studies estimate that nearly 1/3 of all women have been sexually assaulted or beaten by men, and many women say these numbers are low. It is not any woman’s responsibility to assume that men are safe to be around.
10. Do not protect but serve: Men do not join the Party to save or rescue women. We are not here to be heroes. We are not here to be protectors of women; women can protect themselves. Our job is not to protect women; it is to respect their wishes and work in solidarity with them to dismantle Patriarchy. If we take on these roles against the wishes of the particular women involved in a situation, we are violating boundaries. We must agree to not serve with a commissioned or non-commissioned rank in the military, paramilitary services or in the police. We will nto agitate for public office, and we will call out those who do.
11. Virtue is its own reward: We are not owed any thanks or privileges for following these guidelines. We must set an example so that they become the guidelines of minimal decent behavior. We cannot stoop to less. We must make this guideline 'normal'.
by United Valik » Thu Feb 11, 2016 2:52 am
by New Edom » Thu Feb 11, 2016 3:56 am
by Herodas » Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:58 pm
To: The Feminist Collective Party.From:Alexandra Demertzis, Unofficial Minister of Cabinet-Matters.
Aphrodite Damaskinos, Minister of Social Affairs.
Antigone Venizelos, Minister of Justice.
Athene Zahariadis, Minister of Education and Research.
Field Marshal Sanja Salta, Chief of the Federal General Staff (spokesperson).
General Lena "Sungirl" Bardivilias, Chief of the Federal Air Force.
General Doctor Serafina Klados, Cheif of the Federal Medical Staff.
General Sophia Zervas, Chief of the Federal Staff for Public Affairs.
Admiral Zoe Spetsai, Commanding Officer, 2nd Herodan Fleet (FNS Demos).
+ around 700 high-ranking, female governmental and military officials of the Federal Republic of Herodas.
Subject: Criticism.
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Feminist Collective Party,
we are deeply worried about the course you are taking.
We, high-ranking Herodan women, who fought their way up (sometimes metaphorically, sometimes literally) with hard work and determination, know, that our government gave its support to the idea of the communes. We know, that Herodan Strength of Arms pledged to guarantee your independence, should push come to shove.
However, the course suggested by the Right and Honourable Miss Rufina Marcello, member of the radical wing of your party, as well as the "Guidelines for Male Feminist Collective Party Members" have us deeply worried. The acknowledgement of the communes came at our initiative and we would hate to regret this step.
As the case may be: We have a lot of points worrying us.
First. Miss Marcello's proposals, which include new educational guidelines from a feminist point of view and the military's ban on promoting men.
Education, neither in languages, nor in sciences and least of all in social subjects like history, should be taught form any point of view. What is to be taught are cold and hard facts, all of them neutrally and in their entirety. Descending back into the age of teaching points of view, with one main point of view and other "alternate points of view", is a step back into barbary, no matter who teaches like this.
Then, the ban of promotion for men. Many of us are active soldiers, who worked our ways up and up, from conscripts to Admirals, Generals and, in my personal case, to Field Marshal. None of us can imagine an effective military, where a person is not promoted or not given a command because of the position of his (in this case) reproductive organs.
We implore you think thrice before you pass Miss Marcello's proposals, not for our sake, but for your country's sake.
Second, for the "Guidelines for Male Feminist Collective Party Members". To put it in the eloquent words of my beloved daughter Philomena: "I want something of the stuff they smoked to come up with this shit..."
While her terminology used certainly isn't befitting her station as commanding officer of the Presidential Guard Regiment, I can only agree.
Besides the fact, that the notions of guidelines in this case is funny, in the best of cases, we took the liberty of compiling a document, which could be interpreted as guidelines for male and female behaviours in a modern society. We worked closely together with a bunch of colleagues and friends, attached the document at the bottom and are hereby giving you the right to issue it to your people as new guidelines if you wish so.
We cut a bit on the purple prose.
Finally, the ban of men to run for political offices must be lifted. You are robbing your own people and the political process of valueable opinions, perspectives and knowledge with such a ban.
Signed,
Field Marshal Sanja Salta
Chief of the Federal General Staff and appointed spokesperson.
P.S.: We are acting as private persons here, not as Herodan Governmental or Military Officals.Introduction
A modern society is built on the peaceful, equal and productive coexistence of men and women. To reach this, the parents must believe in these basic principles and pass them down onto their children and the state must give equal rights and equal duties to both men and women.
A good man or a good woman is to be defined by their actions, both against people of the other gender as well as against people of their own. While the principles of gallantry and chivalry are a tad bit outdated, both men and women are expected to fight like Lakediamonians, to live like Lokrisians, to discuss like Mycenaens and to work like Illionians: Fight fearsome, live happily, discuss constructively, work hard.
The Guidelines
1. Listen to the other's opinion. No matter if man or woman, every person has a perspective and something interesting to say. Maybe the new perspective gives you a new idea about the topic?
1.1. Argue factually.
2. Listen to your superiors. If male or female, your superiors are your superiors for a reason. Act like it.
3. If you don't know about a topic, keep your trap shut.
4. Speak your opinion, but try to not insult anyone. Someone will always feel offended, even by the most mundane greeting, but try to limit it to a minimum. Or at least make it a decent sweeping blow.
5. No means no.
6. Gentlemanly conduct and Ladylike conduct include being nice to each other, but don't assume anything.
7. Sometimes, men want to be among men and women want to be among women. Respect that.
8. Law does not opress women or men. Be happy about it and work towards keeping it that way.
9. Herodas is a place, where men and women have equal rights, duties and social standing. That is not the case everywhere. Sometimes men are opressed, many times women are opressed for whatever reason. Make yourself familiar with the why and act accordingly.
10. Violence is a serious problem in our society. If you see violence executed against anyone, be it man on man, woman on woman, man on woman or woman on man, call the police and step in.
With these 10 points, life is made easier in a modern society. It is not the cure-all and the end-all, the simple absurd need for this document proofs this.
Upholding a certain code of conduct, be it the Gentleman's, the Ladie's, the Chivalric, the Hoplite's, the Pirate's or any other code of cunduct, is a way of imporiving the quality of the own life, the qualities of the lifes of others and the way to go to earn the respect of peers.
It also helps to make a good catch.
Speaking from experience and for the editorial team,
Aphrodite Damaskinos, Herodan Minister of Social Affairs.
General Lena "Sungirl" Bardivilias, Chief of the Federal Air Force.
by Gloria Regis » Thu Feb 11, 2016 2:10 pm
To: Field Marshal Sanja Salta
Chief of the Federal General Staff and appointed spokesperson (and co-signatories)
From: Vice-Protector Dr. Servilia Aemilianus, Guardian of Justice Theodora Ferrovius
Subject: Guidelines
Dear Field Marshal and friends,
We are glad that your letter is so supportive of our Revolution. So often 'criticism' is not creative or helpful but simply tells us to surrender all our beliefs and submit to the Patriarchy. I am sure you will be glad to know that our most senior officer, Admiral Clytemnestra Hortensius, supported your views and was a deciding figure in having us table the Code of Conduct for the time being. We will be studying your proposal as well as the Marcello-Lokris proposal thoroughly over the next few months.
It is very interesting to us to hear about your country's background when it comes to equality. Would it be possible to have a delegation visit your nation, and vice-versa, to have cultural exchange, explore trade and possible closer relations?
In friendship,
Dr. Servilia Aemlianus, Vice-Protector
Theodora Ferrovius, Guardian of Justice
by Late Roman Empire » Thu Feb 11, 2016 3:53 pm
by Kovruka » Thu Feb 11, 2016 5:40 pm
by Anathaat » Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:29 pm
by United Valik » Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:35 pm
by Caelestiam » Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:47 pm
Herodas wrote:"... I mean, these... what was their name again? Ah, yes, these "Guidelines for Male Feminist Collective Party Members" - cute and all, we could take it apart at its seams for the whole evening, but have you ever read point 7? "Challenge male dominated spaces"? Sure, they cutely list men's clubs as examples, but also male exclusive areas. So, will "Male Feminist Collective Party Members" now go around and challenge male dominance on the male toilet now?"
- Alexander Pnévma, Pnévma's Crazy World, TV-21, 11th of February 2016.To: The Feminist Collective Party.From:Alexandra Demertzis, Unofficial Minister of Cabinet-Matters.
Aphrodite Damaskinos, Minister of Social Affairs.
Antigone Venizelos, Minister of Justice.
Athene Zahariadis, Minister of Education and Research.
Field Marshal Sanja Salta, Chief of the Federal General Staff (spokesperson).
General Lena "Sungirl" Bardivilias, Chief of the Federal Air Force.
General Doctor Serafina Klados, Cheif of the Federal Medical Staff.
General Sophia Zervas, Chief of the Federal Staff for Public Affairs.
Admiral Zoe Spetsai, Commanding Officer, 2nd Herodan Fleet (FNS Demos).
+ around 700 high-ranking, female governmental and military officials of the Federal Republic of Herodas.
Subject: Criticism.
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Feminist Collective Party,
we are deeply worried about the course you are taking.
We, high-ranking Herodan women, who fought their way up (sometimes metaphorically, sometimes literally) with hard work and determination, know, that our government gave its support to the idea of the communes. We know, that Herodan Strength of Arms pledged to guarantee your independence, should push come to shove.
However, the course suggested by the Right and Honourable Miss Rufina Marcello, member of the radical wing of your party, as well as the "Guidelines for Male Feminist Collective Party Members" have us deeply worried. The acknowledgement of the communes came at our initiative and we would hate to regret this step.
As the case may be: We have a lot of points worrying us.
First. Miss Marcello's proposals, which include new educational guidelines from a feminist point of view and the military's ban on promoting men.
Education, neither in languages, nor in sciences and least of all in social subjects like history, should be taught form any point of view. What is to be taught are cold and hard facts, all of them neutrally and in their entirety. Descending back into the age of teaching points of view, with one main point of view and other "alternate points of view", is a step back into barbary, no matter who teaches like this.
Then, the ban of promotion for men. Many of us are active soldiers, who worked our ways up and up, from conscripts to Admirals, Generals and, in my personal case, to Field Marshal. None of us can imagine an effective military, where a person is not promoted or not given a command because of the position of his (in this case) reproductive organs.
We implore you think thrice before you pass Miss Marcello's proposals, not for our sake, but for your country's sake.
Second, for the "Guidelines for Male Feminist Collective Party Members". To put it in the eloquent words of my beloved daughter Philomena: "I want something of the stuff they smoked to come up with this shit..."
While her terminology used certainly isn't befitting her station as commanding officer of the Presidential Guard Regiment, I can only agree.
Besides the fact, that the notions of guidelines in this case is funny, in the best of cases, we took the liberty of compiling a document, which could be interpreted as guidelines for male and female behaviours in a modern society. We worked closely together with a bunch of colleagues and friends, attached the document at the bottom and are hereby giving you the right to issue it to your people as new guidelines if you wish so.
We cut a bit on the purple prose.
Finally, the ban of men to run for political offices must be lifted. You are robbing your own people and the political process of valueable opinions, perspectives and knowledge with such a ban.
Signed,
Field Marshal Sanja Salta
Chief of the Federal General Staff and appointed spokesperson.
P.S.: We are acting as private persons here, not as Herodan Governmental or Military Officals.Introduction
A modern society is built on the peaceful, equal and productive coexistence of men and women. To reach this, the parents must believe in these basic principles and pass them down onto their children and the state must give equal rights and equal duties to both men and women.
A good man or a good woman is to be defined by their actions, both against people of the other gender as well as against people of their own. While the principles of gallantry and chivalry are a tad bit outdated, both men and women are expected to fight like Lakediamonians, to live like Lokrisians, to discuss like Mycenaens and to work like Illionians: Fight fearsome, live happily, discuss constructively, work hard.
The Guidelines
1. Listen to the other's opinion. No matter if man or woman, every person has a perspective and something interesting to say. Maybe the new perspective gives you a new idea about the topic?
1.1. Argue factually.
2. Listen to your superiors. If male or female, your superiors are your superiors for a reason. Act like it.
3. If you don't know about a topic, keep your trap shut.
4. Speak your opinion, but try to not insult anyone. Someone will always feel offended, even by the most mundane greeting, but try to limit it to a minimum. Or at least make it a decent sweeping blow.
5. No means no.
6. Gentlemanly conduct and Ladylike conduct include being nice to each other, but don't assume anything.
7. Sometimes, men want to be among men and women want to be among women. Respect that.
8. Law does not opress women or men. Be happy about it and work towards keeping it that way.
9. Herodas is a place, where men and women have equal rights, duties and social standing. That is not the case everywhere. Sometimes men are opressed, many times women are opressed for whatever reason. Make yourself familiar with the why and act accordingly.
10. Violence is a serious problem in our society. If you see violence executed against anyone, be it man on man, woman on woman, man on woman or woman on man, call the police and step in.
With these 10 points, life is made easier in a modern society. It is not the cure-all and the end-all, the simple absurd need for this document proofs this.
Upholding a certain code of conduct, be it the Gentleman's, the Ladie's, the Chivalric, the Hoplite's, the Pirate's or any other code of cunduct, is a way of imporiving the quality of the own life, the qualities of the lifes of others and the way to go to earn the respect of peers.
It also helps to make a good catch.
Speaking from experience and for the editorial team,
Aphrodite Damaskinos, Herodan Minister of Social Affairs.
General Lena "Sungirl" Bardivilias, Chief of the Federal Air Force.
Troperia wrote:We, of the Troperian Government would like to congratulate Uncle Happy for finally giving their ordinary citizens basic human rights.
by The Shrailleeni Empire » Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:07 pm
The Matriarchal Male
A Treatise
by Professor Retlek Yaserra, Mother University
Reading the regional news lately it is clear that matriarchy and feminism, two distinct philosophies which share in common the female as their area of concentration, are the most controversial philosophies in Cornellia, and possibly the world. They are certainly more controversial than patriarchy, which is of course accepted as a standard of civilization, or egalitarianism, which is a system that paradoxically accepts patriarchy as the natural foundation of civilization from which it can then take narcissistic pride in rising above. It is clear that the oppression of women in any form will never create the same level of outrage and condemnation that the mere mention of "matriarchy" or "feminism" evokes in their detractors.
It is a patriarch's world, and the standards of that civilization dominate the discourse. The language of the patriarchs is power, domination, subjugation, and violence, and they encourage this language in their opponents in order to stoke the flames of their patriarchal egos. A patriarch's self-worth is dependent on his patriarchal "male-ness," which he must prove in combat physical or philosophical. To where, then, does the proponent of matriarchy or feminism turn? To engage the patriarch on his own terms demands by necessity that the matriarch abandon her values, and thus lose the fight before it is even begun.
This treatise intends to circumnavigate this problem by addressing the patriarch in matriarchal terms, to exalt the virtues of matriarchy without falling to his often crude argumentations. I can think of no better way to do this than to consider the arch-enemy of the patriarchal male, namely, the matriarchal male. The patriarchal male is terrified of a liberated woman because he fears that she shall treat him as he has treated her, he shouts down the feminist because he knows that her retribution would be righteous. But the matriarchal male knows this to be folly, because he knows that matriarchy is for him far superior in all ways to its alternatives.
The following are the attributes of the matriarchal male. These attributes can be grouped in the natural order of his development, from son to husband to father, in the manner shown:
1. The Son
Respectful - The son is born into this world knowing nothing but his mother. It is within her that he spends the first months of his life, receiving from her all that he needs, and trusting her to protect him and keep him safe. The trust extends into his early childhood, when a son is dependent on the guidance of his mother over the household in order to safely grow into a man. Therefore, the matriarchal man learns to trust and respect his mother, and by extension all women, as a figure of authority. He acknowledges that he will never have all of the answers, and gains the wisdom of humility.
Contributive - As the son grows, he begins to learn about the world outside of his household. He cannot be a passive actor in this world, rather, he must become an active contributor to his mother's household and to society, to make the most of the gift that his mother has given him. Therefore, the matriarchal man must keep his body and mind in good health by striving for an exemplary education and healthy lifestyle, and apply his talents to aid his mother and his community.
Compassionate - Unlike the patriarchal man, the matriarchal man is not taught that his emotions are a shameful thing to be repressed. Rather, he is encouraged to explore his feelings and develop empathy with those around him. As he interacts with other women and men he learns to understand their emotions, what makes them happy or sad or fearful, and to understand how these make him feel. In this way, the matriarchal man learns compassion, and the inner peace that comes with good emotional health.
2. The Husband
Honest - The matriarchal man does not need to present a false front to the world, because he is comfortable with himself and with his needs. Free from the constraints of controlling and conflict-ridden patriarchal sexuality, which pits men against one another at the expense of women, he may pursue his relationships openly and honestly. The matriarchal man is honest in his interactions with women and men because he is valued for who he truly is, and not for chasing a false ideal of masculinity.
Supportive - The matriarchal woman is strong, but only the Mother Goddess can bring life into this world alone. As a husband, the matriarchal man must have the strength and intelligence to support his wife as she goes through the hardships of her time. Even before this, he must be her partner in forming the central unit of any society: the family. Therefore, the matriarchal man must be ready and capable of supporting his wife with his labors, and to offer her his learned advice in difficult situations.
Brave - The Mother Goddess has granted the male a greater physical strength than the female, and has not done this without purpose. Those who fall from the Enlightened Path are capable of any injury, and may seek to harm others. Just as the mother is weakened by Her miracle of life, so to do the weak of society require his protection. The matriarchal male must be prepared to defend his family and his society, and to lend his strength and ability to this defense. Though he may fear for his own life, the matriarchal male knows that he must take this risk for the greater good.
3. The Father
Nurturing - As a father, it is the duty of the matriarchal man to ensure that his most precious gift, his children, have everything that they need to grow healthy, happy, and strong. Whether this means maintaining a safe and clean home to live in, taking care of their daily needs, or obtaining the resources necessary for their development, he is driven to provide for the welfare of the next generation.
Selfless - Once he has seen his children born into this world, the matriarchal man knows instinctively that nothing is more precious. He will gladly and willingly sacrifice his own well being to ensure the well being of his children, and will face any obstacle or challenge to ensure their safety. The needs of his children become his identity, and through them all the needs of humanity become his identity. Therefore, the matriarchal man moves beyond the vanity of the individual and becomes selfless.
Guiding - Having spent his life acquiring knowledge and experience about the world around him, the matriarchal man is eager to pass his knowledge on to the next generation. To his daughters and sons he will convey all that he knows, to help them grow, develop their own abilities, and to promote the fullest of their potential. He will share this knowledge too with any who seek it, in order to spread its merits freely and humbly for the betterment of all.
And so it can be said that the matriarchal man is respectful, contributive, compassionate, honest, supportive, brave, nurturing, selfless, and guiding. Though his virtues, the matriarchal man earns the honor of his mother, the respect of his wife, and the admiration of his children.
But wait, you may ask, are these not also the attributes of the matriarchal female? Is the matriarchal woman not also expected to exhibit respect, compassion, honesty, bravery, and selflessness, and to work hard to contribute to, support, nurture, guide both her children and her society? A rhetorical question, dear reader, for that is exactly correct.
A matriarchal society promotes and celebrates these traits in its women as much as in its men.
That is because in a matriarchal society, the feminine is exalted in all people. Where the patriarch divides his world cruelly into the categories of "masculine" and "feminine," the matriarch promotes the only the "feminine!" Where the patriarch attempts to restrain humanity to fit his own deluded image, the matriarch fosters the natural state of "femininity" in all people, regardless of their gender.
And so the questions must be asked: who is the more unequal? The Patriarch, who's construction of the world forces conflict between man and man, who restricts both his women and his men to an unnatural stereotype? The Egalitarian, who is told that to find its place in society it must suppress and deny its gender, and therefore must fumble for purpose? Or the Matriarch, who promotes the feminine ideal in both man and woman and holds them to the same purpose, the same merits?
True, the matriarchal male is not often required to lead his nation. But this is not because he is oppressed. Rather, it is because his ideals are already embodied in the leadership of the feminine, a leadership to which he already contributes and to which he naturally belongs. And he is always ready, as the Prince-Regent and the Foreign Minister of the Shrailleeni Empire are, to take up the responsibilities of leadership should his abilities be required. In the rare cases that he must do so, his values guard him against the dangers of oppression or abuse of power, and promote in him the compassion and wisdom that are his nature.
I have little doubt that this treatise will be ridiculed by the patriarch, who by his nature cannot afford to understand the virtues of the matriarchal man. But I hope that some will read this and understand the values that matriarchy promotes, values that promote the best in all peoples, that promote peace and compassion. I hope that some will see that matriarchy is not the crude mirror image of patriarchy, but rather its own path distinct in its qualities and aspirations.
I am Professor Retlek Yaserra, and I am proud to be a matriarchal man.
New Edom wrote:Elizabeth Salt remarked, "It's amazing, isn't it, you rarely see modern troops that wear their 19th century uniforms and gear so well--they must drill all the time. Is this a guards outfit?"
Sif said to her, "This is a modern Shrailleeni Empire military parade. Like as in this is what they wear, this is what they use. This is it."
by Caelestiam » Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:20 pm
The Shrailleeni Empire wrote:The Matriarchal Male
A Treatise
by Professor Retlek Yaserra, Mother University
Reading the regional news lately it is clear that matriarchy and feminism, two distinct philosophies which share in common the female as their area of concentration, are the most controversial philosophies in Cornellia, and possibly the world. They are certainly more controversial than patriarchy, which is of course accepted as a standard of civilization, or egalitarianism, which is a system that paradoxically accepts patriarchy as the natural foundation of civilization from which it can then take narcissistic pride in rising above. It is clear that the oppression of women in any form will never create the same level of outrage and condemnation that the mere mention of "matriarchy" or "feminism" evokes in their detractors.
It is a patriarch's world, and the standards of that civilization dominate the discourse. The language of the patriarchs is power, domination, subjugation, and violence, and they encourage this language in their opponents in order to stoke the flames of their patriarchal egos. A patriarch's self-worth is dependent on his patriarchal "male-ness," which he must prove in combat physical or philosophical. To where, then, does the proponent of matriarchy or feminism turn? To engage the patriarch on his own terms demands by necessity that the matriarch abandon her values, and thus lose the fight before it is even begun.
This treatise intends to circumnavigate this problem by addressing the patriarch in matriarchal terms, to exalt the virtues of matriarchy without falling to his often crude argumentations. I can think of no better way to do this than to consider the arch-enemy of the patriarchal male, namely, the matriarchal male. The patriarchal male is terrified of a liberated woman because he fears that she shall treat him as he has treated her, he shouts down the feminist because he knows that her retribution would be righteous. But the matriarchal male knows this to be folly, because he knows that matriarchy is for him far superior in all ways to its alternatives.
The following are the attributes of the matriarchal male. These attributes can be grouped in the natural order of his development, from son to husband to father, in the manner shown:
1. The Son
Respectful - The son is born into this world knowing nothing but his mother. It is within her that he spends the first months of his life, receiving from her all that he needs, and trusting her to protect him and keep him safe. The trust extends into his early childhood, when a son is dependent on the guidance of his mother over the household in order to safely grow into a man. Therefore, the matriarchal man learns to trust and respect his mother, and by extension all women, as a figure of authority. He acknowledges that he will never have all of the answers, and gains the wisdom of humility.
Contributive - As the son grows, he begins to learn about the world outside of his household. He cannot be a passive actor in this world, rather, he must become an active contributor to his mother's household and to society, to make the most of the gift that his mother has given him. Therefore, the matriarchal man must keep his body and mind in good health by striving for an exemplary education and healthy lifestyle, and apply his talents to aid his mother and his community.
Compassionate - Unlike the patriarchal man, the matriarchal man is not taught that his emotions are a shameful thing to be repressed. Rather, he is encouraged to explore his feelings and develop empathy with those around him. As he interacts with other women and men he learns to understand their emotions, what makes them happy or sad or fearful, and to understand how these make him feel. In this way, the matriarchal man learns compassion, and the inner peace that comes with good emotional health.
2. The Husband
Honest - The matriarchal man does not need to present a false front to the world, because he is comfortable with himself and with his needs. Free from the constraints of controlling and conflict-ridden patriarchal sexuality, which pits men against one another at the expense of women, he may pursue his relationships openly and honestly. The matriarchal man is honest in his interactions with women and men because he is valued for who he truly is, and not for chasing a false ideal of masculinity.
Supportive - The matriarchal woman is strong, but only the Mother Goddess can bring life into this world alone. As a husband, the matriarchal man must have the strength and intelligence to support his wife as she goes through the hardships of her time. Even before this, he must be her partner in forming the central unit of any society: the family. Therefore, the matriarchal man must be ready and capable of supporting his wife with his labors, and to offer her his learned advice in difficult situations.
Brave - The Mother Goddess has granted the male a greater physical strength than the female, and has not done this without purpose. Those who fall from the Enlightened Path are capable of any injury, and may seek to harm others. Just as the mother is weakened by Her miracle of life, so to do the weak of society require his protection. The matriarchal male must be prepared to defend his family and his society, and to lend his strength and ability to this defense. Though he may fear for his own life, the matriarchal male knows that he must take this risk for the greater good.
3. The Father
Nurturing - As a father, it is the duty of the matriarchal man to ensure that his most precious gift, his children, have everything that they need to grow healthy, happy, and strong. Whether this means maintaining a safe and clean home to live in, taking care of their daily needs, or obtaining the resources necessary for their development, he is driven to provide for the welfare of the next generation.
Selfless - Once he has seen his children born into this world, the matriarchal man knows instinctively that nothing is more precious. He will gladly and willingly sacrifice his own well being to ensure the well being of his children, and will face any obstacle or challenge to ensure their safety. The needs of his children become his identity, and through them all the needs of humanity become his identity. Therefore, the matriarchal man moves beyond the vanity of the individual and becomes selfless.
Guiding - Having spent his life acquiring knowledge and experience about the world around him, the matriarchal man is eager to pass his knowledge on to the next generation. To his daughters and sons he will convey all that he knows, to help them grow, develop their own abilities, and to promote the fullest of their potential. He will share this knowledge too with any who seek it, in order to spread its merits freely and humbly for the betterment of all.
And so it can be said that the matriarchal man is respectful, contributive, compassionate, honest, supportive, brave, nurturing, selfless, and guiding. Though his virtues, the matriarchal man earns the honor of his mother, the respect of his wife, and the admiration of his children.
But wait, you may ask, are these not also the attributes of the matriarchal female? Is the matriarchal woman not also expected to exhibit respect, compassion, honesty, bravery, and selflessness, and to work hard to contribute to, support, nurture, guide both her children and her society? A rhetorical question, dear reader, for that is exactly correct.
A matriarchal society promotes and celebrates these traits in its women as much as in its men.
That is because in a matriarchal society, the feminine is exalted in all people. Where the patriarch divides his world cruelly into the categories of "masculine" and "feminine," the matriarch promotes the only the "feminine!" Where the patriarch attempts to restrain humanity to fit his own deluded image, the matriarch fosters the natural state of "femininity" in all people, regardless of their gender.
And so the questions must be asked: who is the more unequal? The Patriarch, who's construction of the world forces conflict between man and man, who restricts both his women and his men to an unnatural stereotype? The Egalitarian, who is told that to find its place in society it must suppress and deny its gender, and therefore must fumble for purpose? Or the Matriarch, who promotes the feminine ideal in both man and woman and holds them to the same purpose, the same merits?
True, the matriarchal male is not often required to lead his nation. But this is not because he is oppressed. Rather, it is because his ideals are already embodied in the leadership of the feminine, a leadership to which he already contributes and to which he naturally belongs. And he is always ready, as the Prince-Regent and the Foreign Minister of the Shrailleeni Empire are, to take up the responsibilities of leadership should his abilities be required. In the rare cases that he must do so, his values guard him against the dangers of oppression or abuse of power, and promote in him the compassion and wisdom that are his nature.
I have little doubt that this treatise will be ridiculed by the patriarch, who by his nature cannot afford to understand the virtues of the matriarchal man. But I hope that some will read this and understand the values that matriarchy promotes, values that promote the best in all peoples, that promote peace and compassion. I hope that some will see that matriarchy is not the crude mirror image of patriarchy, but rather its own path distinct in its qualities and aspirations.
I am Professor Retlek Yaserra, and I am proud to be a matriarchal man.
Troperia wrote:We, of the Troperian Government would like to congratulate Uncle Happy for finally giving their ordinary citizens basic human rights.
by The Shrailleeni Empire » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:25 pm
Caelestiam wrote:"Hoo... Aaalllrriiht. Just because 'ah feel like pickin' arguments. That's just a little thing called embracin' yer feminine side, lad! No matriarchy required, no patriarchy required. Ah' knoo that the rest o' tha work 'as yet tah figure it oot... But it's just called 'not being a dick.'"
~Iola Kamuzu, Ministress of Culture.
"What my colleague means to say is that it is not a necessity to have a matriarchy to encourage feminity, nor is feminity the end all, be all, superior expression. While what you say is wise and idealistic, in the context of Gloria Regis's revolution, succumbing to this ideology makes you just as much of a sheep as the Regis believe our women are to men. You see, Caelestiam is influenced greatly by China, and a lot of us in government subscribe to certain Taoist beliefs. Can't have yin without yang, can't have yang without yin. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being in touch with testosterone, or being 'manly' or whathaveyou. Same goes for feminity. Achieve a balance in all things and you have harmony, which is what we have achieved in Caelestiam."
~Alistan Malique, Minister of Faith.
Honorable greetings to you, Lady Iola Kamuzu and Minister of Faith Alistan Malique,
It is not usual for me to be addressed in correspondence by foreign government officials. I apologize for any misunderstanding, English was regrettably not my primary area of study, and I rely largely on the masterful translation efforts of my colleagues and assistants for correspondence.
Firstly, I think that we can all appreciate the sentiments of "simply choosing to be a good person" (there appeared to be some hesitation to this translation, I hope that it is accurate). However, this raises the question of what it means to be a good person. Depending on how one is raised, this may prove to mean very different things. A patriarch may, for example, feel that it is "good" to keep the women of his family isolated from the outside world (a sentiment common among certain varieties of the Islam religion). To us, this is controlling and oppression, but for him it is common sense. There are systems of learning right from wrong. I am simply offering that matriarchy is the superior of these systems.
Indeed, it must be mentioned that the use of the term "feminine side" is victim of a logical failing. What you consider "feminine," I consider to be the human ideal.
It is certainly not necessary to have a matriarchy in order to encourage femininity. But if to encourage femininity is your goal, then I would argue that matriarchy is the only logical outcome. I would also argue that there are few to none inherently "masculine" ideals that lead to the benefit of a society.
I know little of the Taoist believes, but I do know something of balance and harmony. These are well known concepts in my homeland, however, I would not ascribe the ideals of matriarchy itself to this balance, rather to aspects within it (compassion balanced by the need for defensive action, for example). I also know something of cultures rooted in the concept of "China," such as the nation Hostillia in our region. These cultures are unashamedly patriarchal, often assigning women to a place profoundly subordinate to men, to the extent that they value the potential for male children over the lives of their existing female children. Caelestiam seems to have risen above this culture, but your ways are your own.
The ways of Gloria Regis are their own as well. As are the ways of we Shrailleeni our own. What I say lies in the context of millennia of our own great civilization, which is at its heart matriarchal in nature. For the revolution of Gloria Regis, I simply hope to offer a path that they may choose to take, but ultimately the choice is theirs. They have experience much that neither of our cultures has, and cannot be judged in the same light. I am no government official, but unless my Sisters in Gloria Regis choose to descend into utterly barbarity I am confident that my Mother Empress will continue to support their right to independent self-government, and I believe that this is right.
I thank you for your correspondence, many the Light of the Mother Goddess shine upon you and upon your peoples,
Professor Retlek Yaserra
New Edom wrote:Elizabeth Salt remarked, "It's amazing, isn't it, you rarely see modern troops that wear their 19th century uniforms and gear so well--they must drill all the time. Is this a guards outfit?"
Sif said to her, "This is a modern Shrailleeni Empire military parade. Like as in this is what they wear, this is what they use. This is it."
by Arbites » Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:09 am
To: Janos Magyari, Acting Federalist Party Leader
From: Governor Rogatus, Krutongo
Subject: Assassination
Encryption: Hand-delivered
The Imperium is shocked and appalled at the callous murder of Mikas Baukis. He is with the Emperor now, and will be welcomed into heaven for his faith and dedication to justice and morality. We shall grieve for him, as his leadership will be sorely missed in these trying times. The Order Eidos as I understand it is putting out a memorial piece which outlines Baukis' long service and officially canonizing him as a martyr.
In these trying times, those of the faith find themselves assailed by feminists looking to force their ways of life on Cornellia. Krutongo faces a blockade by the Deadorans which amounts to an act of war, and now they have murdered the leader of the Federalist Party. I fear that we are already under attack. We must look to Baukis' example, who was called home by the Emperor while doing his good work.
The feminists have unveiled their true colors. Now is the time to act. All of Valik must know that this is the face of feminism. This is the true nature of the architects of the SAEC, and assassinations, intimidation tactics, and chaos are ultimately what every party will face at the hands of international feminism.
We are arranging for His Holiness Bishop Gascoigne will provide the Federalist Party with financial and material support in anticipation of feminist aggression. In the meantime, we hope that the question of party leadership will be settled relatively quickly. Baukis would not want his brothers to quarrel amongst themselves for his position, only that they continue to do their duty to the Emperor. Right now the focus is on the undisciplined communist scourge, which means we have an opportunity to carry out more civil demonstrations.
It is the opinion of my government that the Federalists should step up their activism. Advisors can assist the party in planning demonstrations, media coverage, and applying pressure upon those who would give feminist assassins a free pass. We should start with the assassination. As far as I know, there has already been controversy over Gloria Regis in Valik. The assassin was clad in a Gloria Regian flag. This sort of connection cannot be discounted. The murderer of Mikas Baukis was bound to have known associates. They are almost certainly suspect, and the government should be pressured to mount an investigation.
As the Federalists have stood by Krutongo, so shall we stand by the Federalists, for it is written that he who stands with me shall be my brother.
By His Glorious Name,
Charles Rogatus
Governor of Krutongo
by Herodas » Fri Feb 12, 2016 3:10 am
Gloria Regis wrote:Heraclea, Gloria Regis
The "Herodas Letter" as it came to be called, had a divisive effect on the Feminist Collective Party. While the Protector, Livia Barberina, was more worried about counter-revolutionary sentiment and foreign hostility, she had given a great deal of control of security over to Theodora Ferrovius and her followers. Dr. Servilia Aemlianus, the Vice-Protector, had been more concerned about trying to balance Ferrovius' policies against the vital need to not have the country descend into complete poverty.
While the Protector had thanked the Herodas letter writers politely and told them their suggestions would be taken under advisement, the reading of it aloud by a derisive Chloe Lokris at another Bountiful Park meeting and then by Aemilianus herself at a meeting of the Council of Guardians broke the year long truce in the different factions of the Party.
Admiral Clytemnestra Hortensius, the Chief of Defense Staff, gave a testimony to the Council of Guardians and explained her own views on the matter.
"I think that the guidelines proposed by the Student Union are extreme," she said in her slow measured way. "In our Revolution, women and men worked together. I fought for this country's independence because I believed that men and women ought to be equal and I did not believe we could do that in the colonial system we were under. I saw too much sexual harassment and unfair discrimination against women. However without our male comrades we could not have succeeded in the mutiny which was one of the main reasons why we were able to free ourselves. I am not in agreement with the Code of Conduct. I will not ask my male comrades who are officers and petty officers to resign, and i will not be party to forming our army under those circumstances. If need be I will resign, though I will be unhappy to do so."
Hortensius had been reluctant to speak up about policy. She had strongly been determined to not interfere with civilian control of the military.
Guardian of Justice Theodora Ferrovius spoke in response. "I think that the Admiral is one of our greatest heroes. I will honour her to my dying day. But with all respect to her, she has said herself that her expertise is in military matters. But her advice is well received, and I think that we should keep the Code of Conduct under advisement and review both proposed ideas."
Theodora had no intention of locking horns with Hortensius when the woman scarcely had to buy a drink for herself in the capital. The Student Union had other work they could be focused on, persuading more students and other citizens to join the Party. All good things in good time. The other Guardians in the Council chimed in. The important thing, Theodora later told Julianna Aspen, her right hand and the Guardian of Police, that "we have political control. It's important to test the waters from time to time."To: Field Marshal Sanja Salta
Chief of the Federal General Staff and appointed spokesperson (and co-signatories)
From: Vice-Protector Dr. Servilia Aemilianus, Guardian of Justice Theodora Ferrovius
Subject: Guidelines
Dear Field Marshal and friends,
We are glad that your letter is so supportive of our Revolution. So often 'criticism' is not creative or helpful but simply tells us to surrender all our beliefs and submit to the Patriarchy. I am sure you will be glad to know that our most senior officer, Admiral Clytemnestra Hortensius, supported your views and was a deciding figure in having us table the Code of Conduct for the time being. We will be studying your proposal as well as the Marcello-Lokris proposal thoroughly over the next few months.
It is very interesting to us to hear about your country's background when it comes to equality. Would it be possible to have a delegation visit your nation, and vice-versa, to have cultural exchange, explore trade and possible closer relations?
In friendship,
Dr. Servilia Aemlianus, Vice-Protector
Theodora Ferrovius, Guardian of Justice
The smiles between the two women seemed to Livia to look mutually friendly, but she had a sinkng heart. Her left and right hand probably had never had a more subtle yet more clear declaration of rivalry. She feared it might one day tear their Revolution apart. Ferrovius might control the police and justice officials as well as having mobs of zealous radicals at her becka nd call, but Servilia was more popular among the rather more moderate Navy and Marines, the only regular military personnel the nation had as yet. Livia was the main figure supported by their foreign allies--the Shrailleeni, Deadorans, Jedorians, and Anathaat. Socialist nations which supported Gloria Regis also identified Livia as more of an ally than the other two leaders. She had been a strong ally to the Communist Party when it had still been strong in the country. But she was feeling more and more as though she had to stretch between two extreme positions to keep the Party together...
To:Dr. Servilia Aemlianus, Vice-Protector.
Theodora Ferrovius, Guardian of Justice.
From: Field Marshal Sanja Salta and company.
Subject: Your reply.
Dear Vice-Protector,
Dear Guardian,
it is good to know, that constructive criticism is appreciated. Too often, even the most well meant criticism is repulsed because it does not work well with established beliefs. We were a bit afraid, that our cut on purple prose might lead to a rejection of the proposed new guidelines.
As for sending a delegation: A civilian delegation will always be welcome. If need should arise, I would be honoured to offer my personal hospitality. Several of my "co-conspirators" signalled their interest in housing such a mission as well.
We are currently budgeoning Mister Demertzis, our Foreign Minister, and President Maximos, our President, to allow an official, governmental delegation, but we do not expect any major problems to arise.
We wish you the best for your future. May wisdom and reason govern your land, may sharp spears protect your land and may rich harvests grace your fields.
Signed,
Field Marshal Sanja Salta
Chief of the Federal General Staff and appointed spokesperson.
by Kovruka » Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:14 am
by United Valik » Fri Feb 12, 2016 2:58 pm
To: Governor Rogatus, Krutongo
From: Janos Magyari, Acting Federalist Party Leader
Subject: Assassination
Encryption: Hand-delivered
Your Excellency,
I am pleased to hear from you and to also inform you that, so far, our efforts are very much on track. Thanks to additional resources made available to us courtesy of His Holiness, as well as new donations from converts to the faith, not only has our party gained positive attention and support for its drive to remove United Valik from SAEC and exact retribution against Gloria Regis and the Feminists for their crimes against the Emperor and mankind, but we have also gained new party members, including among our youth/student wing. We have also seen figures in terms of conversion, largely at the expense of spiritually orphaned atheists disaffected with both the Ruinous Powers and materialistic world-views.
I am also pleased to report that the election internally has gone through smoothly and I am now the duly elected permanent Chairman of the General Council, with the option to co-opt one new member to the General Council (which I will work to make sure is a brother, thus giving us a clear majority for the faith on the governing body at last). I have also managed to steer an agnostic member toward the faith with the Bishop's able assistance, giving us half the members on our side already.
I hope to have further good news in the near future, as we are still working for expanding the faith's hold on the party, making it more totally under our thumb.
In His Glorious Name,
Janos Magyari, Chairman of the General Council
by Anathaat » Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:32 pm
To all those it Concerns:
This is a reminder to all of you that the monthly defense review is tomorrow at 0900 at the usual location. Be prepared for long day and I eagerly await seeing all of you again.
Hōdanathit Zibmuut
Military Liaison to Gloria Regis
The Anathaat Ministry of War
by Gloria Regis » Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:15 pm
The Matriarchal Male
A Treatise
by Professor Retlek Yaserra, Mother University
Reading the regional news lately it is clear that matriarchy and feminism, two distinct philosophies which share in common the female as their area of concentration, are the most controversial philosophies in Cornellia, and possibly the world. They are certainly more controversial than patriarchy, which is of course accepted as a standard of civilization, or egalitarianism, which is a system that paradoxically accepts patriarchy as the natural foundation of civilization from which it can then take narcissistic pride in rising above. It is clear that the oppression of women in any form will never create the same level of outrage and condemnation that the mere mention of "matriarchy" or "feminism" evokes in their detractors.
It is a patriarch's world, and the standards of that civilization dominate the discourse. The language of the patriarchs is power, domination, subjugation, and violence, and they encourage this language in their opponents in order to stoke the flames of their patriarchal egos. A patriarch's self-worth is dependent on his patriarchal "male-ness," which he must prove in combat physical or philosophical. To where, then, does the proponent of matriarchy or feminism turn? To engage the patriarch on his own terms demands by necessity that the matriarch abandon her values, and thus lose the fight before it is even begun.
This treatise intends to circumnavigate this problem by addressing the patriarch in matriarchal terms, to exalt the virtues of matriarchy without falling to his often crude argumentations. I can think of no better way to do this than to consider the arch-enemy of the patriarchal male, namely, the matriarchal male. The patriarchal male is terrified of a liberated woman because he fears that she shall treat him as he has treated her, he shouts down the feminist because he knows that her retribution would be righteous. But the matriarchal male knows this to be folly, because he knows that matriarchy is for him far superior in all ways to its alternatives.
The following are the attributes of the matriarchal male. These attributes can be grouped in the natural order of his development, from son to husband to father, in the manner shown:
1. The Son
Respectful - The son is born into this world knowing nothing but his mother. It is within her that he spends the first months of his life, receiving from her all that he needs, and trusting her to protect him and keep him safe. The trust extends into his early childhood, when a son is dependent on the guidance of his mother over the household in order to safely grow into a man. Therefore, the matriarchal man learns to trust and respect his mother, and by extension all women, as a figure of authority. He acknowledges that he will never have all of the answers, and gains the wisdom of humility.
Contributive - As the son grows, he begins to learn about the world outside of his household. He cannot be a passive actor in this world, rather, he must become an active contributor to his mother's household and to society, to make the most of the gift that his mother has given him. Therefore, the matriarchal man must keep his body and mind in good health by striving for an exemplary education and healthy lifestyle, and apply his talents to aid his mother and his community.
Compassionate - Unlike the patriarchal man, the matriarchal man is not taught that his emotions are a shameful thing to be repressed. Rather, he is encouraged to explore his feelings and develop empathy with those around him. As he interacts with other women and men he learns to understand their emotions, what makes them happy or sad or fearful, and to understand how these make him feel. In this way, the matriarchal man learns compassion, and the inner peace that comes with good emotional health.
2. The Husband
Honest - The matriarchal man does not need to present a false front to the world, because he is comfortable with himself and with his needs. Free from the constraints of controlling and conflict-ridden patriarchal sexuality, which pits men against one another at the expense of women, he may pursue his relationships openly and honestly. The matriarchal man is honest in his interactions with women and men because he is valued for who he truly is, and not for chasing a false ideal of masculinity.
Supportive - The matriarchal woman is strong, but only the Mother Goddess can bring life into this world alone. As a husband, the matriarchal man must have the strength and intelligence to support his wife as she goes through the hardships of her time. Even before this, he must be her partner in forming the central unit of any society: the family. Therefore, the matriarchal man must be ready and capable of supporting his wife with his labors, and to offer her his learned advice in difficult situations.
Brave - The Mother Goddess has granted the male a greater physical strength than the female, and has not done this without purpose. Those who fall from the Enlightened Path are capable of any injury, and may seek to harm others. Just as the mother is weakened by Her miracle of life, so to do the weak of society require his protection. The matriarchal male must be prepared to defend his family and his society, and to lend his strength and ability to this defense. Though he may fear for his own life, the matriarchal male knows that he must take this risk for the greater good.
3. The Father
Nurturing - As a father, it is the duty of the matriarchal man to ensure that his most precious gift, his children, have everything that they need to grow healthy, happy, and strong. Whether this means maintaining a safe and clean home to live in, taking care of their daily needs, or obtaining the resources necessary for their development, he is driven to provide for the welfare of the next generation.
Selfless - Once he has seen his children born into this world, the matriarchal man knows instinctively that nothing is more precious. He will gladly and willingly sacrifice his own well being to ensure the well being of his children, and will face any obstacle or challenge to ensure their safety. The needs of his children become his identity, and through them all the needs of humanity become his identity. Therefore, the matriarchal man moves beyond the vanity of the individual and becomes selfless.
Guiding - Having spent his life acquiring knowledge and experience about the world around him, the matriarchal man is eager to pass his knowledge on to the next generation. To his daughters and sons he will convey all that he knows, to help them grow, develop their own abilities, and to promote the fullest of their potential. He will share this knowledge too with any who seek it, in order to spread its merits freely and humbly for the betterment of all.
And so it can be said that the matriarchal man is respectful, contributive, compassionate, honest, supportive, brave, nurturing, selfless, and guiding. Though his virtues, the matriarchal man earns the honor of his mother, the respect of his wife, and the admiration of his children.
But wait, you may ask, are these not also the attributes of the matriarchal female? Is the matriarchal woman not also expected to exhibit respect, compassion, honesty, bravery, and selflessness, and to work hard to contribute to, support, nurture, guide both her children and her society? A rhetorical question, dear reader, for that is exactly correct.
A matriarchal society promotes and celebrates these traits in its women as much as in its men.
That is because in a matriarchal society, the feminine is exalted in all people. Where the patriarch divides his world cruelly into the categories of "masculine" and "feminine," the matriarch promotes the only the "feminine!" Where the patriarch attempts to restrain humanity to fit his own deluded image, the matriarch fosters the natural state of "femininity" in all people, regardless of their gender.
And so the questions must be asked: who is the more unequal? The Patriarch, who's construction of the world forces conflict between man and man, who restricts both his women and his men to an unnatural stereotype? The Egalitarian, who is told that to find its place in society it must suppress and deny its gender, and therefore must fumble for purpose? Or the Matriarch, who promotes the feminine ideal in both man and woman and holds them to the same purpose, the same merits?
True, the matriarchal male is not often required to lead his nation. But this is not because he is oppressed. Rather, it is because his ideals are already embodied in the leadership of the feminine, a leadership to which he already contributes and to which he naturally belongs. And he is always ready, as the Prince-Regent and the Foreign Minister of the Shrailleeni Empire are, to take up the responsibilities of leadership should his abilities be required. In the rare cases that he must do so, his values guard him against the dangers of oppression or abuse of power, and promote in him the compassion and wisdom that are his nature.
I have little doubt that this treatise will be ridiculed by the patriarch, who by his nature cannot afford to understand the virtues of the matriarchal man. But I hope that some will read this and understand the values that matriarchy promotes, values that promote the best in all peoples, that promote peace and compassion. I hope that some will see that matriarchy is not the crude mirror image of patriarchy, but rather its own path distinct in its qualities and aspirations.
I am Professor Retlek Yaserra, and I am proud to be a matriarchal man.
by Gloria Regis » Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:41 pm
by Gloria Regis » Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:20 pm
by Gloria Regis » Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:52 pm
To: Field Marshal Sanja Salta
Chief of the Federal General Staff
From: Dr. Servilia Aemilianus, Vice-Protector
Subject: State Visit
Dear Field Marshal,
First, on behalf of my government and country, i am very honoured that you wuold invite me into your private home, and I will gladly accept the invitation. I would like very much both as a citizen of my country and as head of government to visit yours.
Second, I hope we can work out some of the details of what would be discussed. I am hoping we can talk about cultural exchange, educational exchange and trade first and foremost. I do not know if you are aware but there are former trading partners who have all but put sanctions against us for some of our acts of legislation. Unlike your government which was cool headed and thoughtful, these other governments like United Valik simply slapped enormous tariffs against our country and withdrew their embassy. We are not a monolith though.
Third, I hope it is understood that our government is approaching matriarchy by democratic process. While some seriously complain, our Party achieved a majority in the Assembly and adopted constitutional changes by a process of voting. I am personally wondering how much more radical change we need, and I think that a pause on constitutional shifts might be wise for the time being. however i also don't think you know much about our history. We have had to put up with the most violent forms of patriarchy including fascist movements, assassination and bombing campaigns, and the End Times Church militia, which engaged in a reign of terror in our cities before it was finally put down. It was only the intervention of military units which mutinied against our colonial masters on our behalf that we were not, frankly, all raped into submission. I wish that were only hyperbole.
We do not hate men. We do not want to oppress men. It is for this reason that I hope we can have good discussions and come to an understanding. Face to face meetings are probably best--to see one another as people and not as words and theories.
sincerely,
Dr. Servilia Aemilianus
Vice-Protector of Gloria Regis
by Late Roman Empire » Sat Feb 13, 2016 1:13 am
To: John Ashdod, Council Police Minister
From: Donatus Severianus Comes, Vigilus Primus
CC: Gloria Regis
Encryption: Highest
Ave,
My brother and colleague, this is a delicate matter, which the Divine Augustus had been loathe to contemplate until recent measures forced them upon the conscience of His Eternity. Allow me to be perfectly candid, then. Gloria Regis is not some small island in the middle of nowhere, where the fate of its Christian and Cornellian citizens can be of lesser significance or consequence to the Emperor and Empire. Gloria Regis is a nation with close historical ties to both of our countries, and we owe it to the people there to force the hand of its present, tyrannical regime. The idea of matriarchy being forced on its people, contrary to their Christian and patriarchal history, is an abomination. Democratic process cannot by itself abolish historical privileges and rights, nor should it be allowed to do so.
However, due to the role of the Shrailleeni Empire, our mutual ally, it would not suit either of our nations to intervene militarily. Therefore, some subterfuge is once more called for, I imagine. For this, we need an additional partner, the Imperium of Arbites Materia, I believe. Specifically, their Inquisition and its agents. Would His Majesty's Government be open to such measures, given the desperate times in which the region now lives? I can only guess that we would have plenty of unusual confederates in this, particularly in the Intellectual and Free Congress parties, too, as well as the Monarchists.
What I propose amounts to this: a proxy street war by newly recruited citizens of our three nations, in which they subvert the present Gloria Regian government, along with cyber-attacks and especially denial-of-service strikes. Misinformation, propaganda, etc. are necessary. A concerted effort would be made to get funding to discontented parties in Gloria Regis, including any that are open to such methods in order to restore good government in that land. In this cause, our ends do indeed justify whatever means we deem expedient. At some point, arms smuggling might well be required, as well as the denizens of organized crime.
If interested, please take this matter to His Majesty posthaste, but under the highest possible security protocols. If disinterested, please destroy all records or evidence of this correspondence.
In hoc signo vinces,
Donatus Severianus Comes
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement