Court Policy On Speech Concerning Non-Justices
In order to present the minimal possible undue influence upon the non-biased nature of the Court, residents of The Western Isles have the following restrictions placed upon their speech while interacting with the Court.
- If, during a debate concerning the constitutionality of a proposed amendment, a justice poses a question to the author of said amendment, the author may answer the question only, and may only post without answer if they are to post a requested change to their proposed amendment.
- A plaintiff or defendant may only speak, during trials, after a justice formally motions to the plaintiff or defendant that they may speak a certain length in regards to the trial at hand.
- Non-justices may speak once to the court to announce a lodging of a case, or piece of legislation to the Supreme Court which needs judging before further action is committed.
Information on Trials
Court Docket
Judicial Opinions
Trials
The Western Isles v. Wadden-Amrum - Under Consideration
Proposed Legislation
World Assembly Delegate Procedures Act - WITHDRAWN
World Assembly Delegate Procedures Act (2) - REJECTED 0-3-0
Map Reform Procedure Act (2015) - APPROVED 3-0-0