[DRAFT] Condemnation of Zombie Genocide

[Troperia]

Category: People's Rights | Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Troperia

World Assembly,

ACKNOWLEDGING that the zombie virus will infect a sizable portion of the world,

NOTING that most nations will try to stop the infection,

SHOCKED that some nations decides to kill zombies instead of cure them,

DISGUSTED that they're basically killing their own citizen,

HORRIFIED by the fact that they don't care those zombies are their own citizens,

URGING the WA to take action against this while also,

KNOWING the WA would definitely fall within the first hour of infection or so,

RENDERING this resolution null and ineffective,

HAVING this resolution written anyway as a reminder for all nations who the zombies are,

HEREBY,

1) DEFINES:
-zombies as people infected with the virus, suffers severe brain damage, and cause chaos in society.
-genocide as the mass killing of a certain group of people.
-cure as the miracle which would turn zombies back into regular people.

2) OUTLAWS the act of genocide against zombies.

3) PUNISH nations that do commit genocide against zombies regardless as long as the WA has still not fallen.

4) FOCUS on developing a cure for the zombies.

5) ENCOURAGE all member and non-member nations to do the same.

6) DIVERT all WA funding to developing a cure for the zombies, and

7) IGNORE everything that happens after the WA has fallen.

Category: People's Rights | Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Troperia

World Assembly,

ACKNOWLEDGING that the zombie virus will infect a sizable portion of the world,

NOTING that most nations will try to stop the infection,

SHOCKED that some nations decides to kill zombies instead of cure them,

DISGUSTED that they're basically killing their own citizen,

HORRIFIED by the fact that they don't care those zombies are their own citizens,

URGING the WA to take action against this,

HEREBY,

1) DEFINES zombies as people infected with the virus, suffers severe brain damage, and cause chaos in society.

2) OUTLAWS the unlawful practice of killing zombies.

3) PUNISH nations that do kill zombies regardless.

4) FOCUS on developing a cure for the zombies, and

5) ALLOW nations to form zombie hordes if they want to.

[New Axiom]

No.

[Dalvius]

Support.

[Stratarin]

Opposed.

[Outer Sparta]

We cure, but we'll abstain from further details here.

[East Catalina]

Though I cure I am opposed to this.

[Cresenthia]

You could probably even cross-reference the recent quarantine resolution. Support vigorously.

[The Campbell Nation]

Absolutely opposed. Not only does this jeopardize the lives of billions by effectively outlawing member states from using force in carrying out necessary quarantine operations, which, may I remind the ambassador, is a fairly common occurrence even in relatively developed countries with the capacity to contribute to research, but it contradicts WA policy. For starters, it flies directly in the face of GAR #385 Quarantine Regulation, which encourages, mandates, even, exactly the kind of proactive response which this resolution seeks to outlaw.

This also undermines the sovereignty of nations to determine their own judicial proceedings, as it effectively forbids capital punishment if the accused just so happens to be infected, a violation of GAR #375 Crime and Punishment. If the argument being made is that citizens should not be treated differently merely because they have contracted a particular virus, how can it make sense to mandate a completely different legal standard? Should we be exempting convicts from punishment for murder merely because they have the flu? Of course not. Likewise, nations should apply the same standard for murder regardless of whether they are infected or not. If this standard is execution, then so be it.

[Uiiop]

We would support this except for number 5. It doesn't make sense with all the previous arguments and herebys and would allow operations that could cancel out any cure.

[United Dixieland Territories]

Ya'll are nuts, it's a horde of goddamn flesh eating abominations. Just shoot em' & firebomb em', god will sort out of the victims from the survivors.

[Uiiop]

Ya'll are nuts, it's a horde of goddamn flesh eating abominations. Just shoot em' & firebomb em', god will sort out of the victims from the survivors.

The cure does work however.
People do revert to their pre-infection state.
With that being an option it's clear to see why people are uncomfortable with the extermination option.

[The Campbell Nation]

Ya'll are nuts, it's a horde of goddamn flesh eating abominations. Just shoot em' & firebomb em', god will sort out of the victims from the survivors.

The cure does work however.
People do revert to their pre-infection state.
With that being an option it's clear to see why people are uncomfortable with the extermination option.

The cure has historically worked. An important distinction. With each new and resistant strain, there is the renewed risk that our scientists will hit a brick wall, and a cure will either not be possible, or the time and resources needed to find and distribute one would render it irrelevant. With this in mind, it is easy to see why some of us want to be conservative in our approach. Even if we remain committed to curing wherever possible, it is important to keep our options open.

[Austerain]

First of all, I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this.

Secondly, a resolution can't meta-game and try to change game functions

[United Dixieland Territories]

Ya'll are nuts, it's a horde of goddamn flesh eating abominations. Just shoot em' & firebomb em', god will sort out of the victims from the survivors.

The cure does work however.
People do revert to their pre-infection state.
With that being an option it's clear to see why people are uncomfortable with the extermination option.

Hell with treatin' em'; can't trust em' if their flesh was rotting off while they SOBs start collectively deciding to chaw on your brainpan & guts.

With that said;

A) they were recently necrotic to an extreme extent, thereby brain damage and necrosis of valuable and important bodily tissues.

B) with said bodily tissue necrosis, and intense psychopathy for those caught "early enough" becoming ticking time bombs of violent psychological instability

C) The honest reality that must be faced herein, should said person survive the tissue necrosis, avoid the neurological damage; would they not ask for euthanasia as an act of mercy to avoid enduring further life in such a state? (If one could be so bold as to call it even "Living")

[New Kattslant WA Member]

Support for the lulz

[Longweather]

Like most attempts from outside entities to usurp the sovereignty of the Imperial Dominion through outside legislation, we will ignore such condemnation. If citizens of any of our worlds wish to protect themselves from those infected with the undead virus through "lethal" force, then so be it. The Imperial Dominion will work on a cure for the virus in the meantime.

[Uiiop]

The cure does work however.
People do revert to their pre-infection state.
With that being an option it's clear to see why people are uncomfortable with the extermination option.

The cure has historically worked. An important distinction. With each new and resistant strain, there is the renewed risk that our scientists will hit a brick wall, and a cure will either not be possible, or the time and resources needed to find and distribute one would render it irrelevant. With this in mind, it is easy to see why some of us want to be conservative in our approach. Even if we remain committed to curing wherever possible, it is important to keep our options open.

fair enough...hence saying it's uncomfortable rather than shaming anyone who comes to that option.

[Uiiop]

The cure does work however.
People do revert to their pre-infection state.
With that being an option it's clear to see why people are uncomfortable with the extermination option.

Hell with treatin' em'; can't trust em' if their flesh was rotting off while they SOBs start collectively deciding to chaw on your brainpan & guts.

With that said;

A) they were recently necrotic to an extreme extent, thereby brain damage and necrosis of valuable and important bodily tissues.

B) with said bodily tissue necrosis, and intense psychopathy for those caught "early enough" becoming ticking time bombs of violent psychological instability

C) The honest reality that must be faced herein, should said person survive the tissue necrosis, avoid the neurological damage; would they not ask for euthanasia as an act of mercy to avoid enduring further life in such a state? (If one could be so bold as to call it even "Living")

Again you seem to ignore the effects(At least historically) of the cure. It's a complete reversion of the condition.

[Troperia]

The second, more improved draft has been published!

[Vavax]

Will support, though would like to see some mention about building a wall between us and the zombies, and making the zombies pay for it.

[Isyrannaea]

Freedom has gone too far.

[Uiiop]

The second, more improved draft has been published!

Much better though we shouldn't act like 7 is a certainly

[Excidium Planetis]

Ambassador Blackbourne stands up amidst the madness. "Absolutely not. Zombies are not sapient, thus, they have no rights."

[Kustgebied]

"Ambassador, with all due respect, the World Space Administration was a better idea than this."

[Rokodan]

Definitely going to infect Troperia with the virus and see's if he doesnt kill his own 'citizens'.