Page 398 of 500
Posted:
Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:39 pmby Lingang
Hey why are we rating Alleniana?
Posted:
Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:42 pmby The Jonathanian States
The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:The Jonathanian States wrote:If you have the supporters there's a chance I could do it.
Here is the Lesser CoA (which you already have lmfao)
Indeed.
and then the two supporters I would like. So basically
this unicorn holding it on both sides
Do you by chance also have its flipside, as seen in the later image?
FYI, I don't think I could manage to get the supporters be to both sides of the order (it being between their frontal legs). I assume I could get them behind or in front of the order.
A'ight. By the way, this is the flipside horse I talked of earlier.
Posted:
Fri Jul 03, 2015 5:09 pmby The Kingdom of Glitter
Posted:
Fri Jul 03, 2015 5:15 pmby Terminus Alpha
The Man in the Sand Castle is back, if anyone is interested.
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:51 amby The New Greek Republic
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 11:43 amby Of the Quendi
If there is any interest in a Napoleonic Victory RP
here is what I hope will be a good one.
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 2:17 pmby Caltarania
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 2:33 pmby Reatra
Caltarania wrote:-jizms errywhere-
Please define jizm
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 2:40 pmby Caltarania
Reatra wrote:Caltarania wrote:-jizms errywhere-
Please define jizm
It's cum.
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 3:37 pmby Reatra
Caltarania wrote:Reatra wrote:Please define jizm
It's cum.
I believe you're thinking of "jizz"
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 4:19 pmby The Jonathanian States
"A discussion about the naming conventions of Sperm" - A play in three parts, as presented to you by the Historicals.
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 4:20 pmby Caltarania
Reatra wrote:Caltarania wrote:It's cum.
I believe you're thinking of "jizz"
jizm is a slang term for jizz you uncultured swine
Posted:
Sat Jul 04, 2015 4:39 pmby Baja California y Sonora
*Barfs*
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:19 pmby G-Tech Corporation
Got an idea I figured I'd run by you fellows; city-state RP, early iron age, player blindness to map and discovered as time passes. Chosen but limited resources, population growth done by page, completely freeform with battles and tech determined over time.
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:22 pmby Neo-Assyrian Empire
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Got an idea I figured I'd run by you fellows; city-state RP, early iron age, player blindness to map and discovered as time passes. Chosen but limited resources, population growth done by page, completely freeform with battles and tech determined over time.
That sounds pretty cool. But how would the map blindness work? Would there be an official map that only you would have until everyone had discovered eachother? Would there be no map?
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:27 pmby G-Tech Corporation
Neo-Assyrian Empire wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:Got an idea I figured I'd run by you fellows; city-state RP, early iron age, player blindness to map and discovered as time passes. Chosen but limited resources, population growth done by page, completely freeform with battles and tech determined over time.
That sounds pretty cool. But how would the map blindness work? Would there be an official map that only you would have until everyone had discovered eachother? Would there be no map?
There would be an official map, hidden and known only to me. Exploration would be one of the few actions that would have to be worked with through the OP, and over time people could develop their own personal maps, trade maps to other city-states they encounter, try to build a coherent map of the world, all that.
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:29 pmby Kisinger
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Neo-Assyrian Empire wrote:That sounds pretty cool. But how would the map blindness work? Would there be an official map that only you would have until everyone had discovered eachother? Would there be no map?
There would be an official map, hidden and known only to me. Exploration would be one of the few actions that would have to be worked with through the OP, and over time people could develop their own personal maps, trade maps to other city-states they encounter, try to build a coherent map of the world, all that.
I likes it as long as it doesn't end up like the last one we tried.... Or the one about the Civilization thingy
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:31 pmby G-Tech Corporation
Kisinger wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:There would be an official map, hidden and known only to me. Exploration would be one of the few actions that would have to be worked with through the OP, and over time people could develop their own personal maps, trade maps to other city-states they encounter, try to build a coherent map of the world, all that.
I likes it as long as it doesn't end up like the last one we tried.... Or the one about the Civilization thingy
Yeah, I'm trying to limit a need for post barriers tied to an OP, and might appoint a Co-Op or two to deal with battles and tech progression. Should be interesting.
The Civilization thingy?
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:37 pmby Kisinger
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Kisinger wrote:I likes it as long as it doesn't end up like the last one we tried.... Or the one about the Civilization thingy
Yeah, I'm trying to limit a need for post barriers tied to an OP, and might appoint a Co-Op or two to deal with battles and tech progression. Should be interesting.
The Civilization thingy?
The one where I was the Mongols without the horses? And we had weird swamp people too.... You know, it's really old now but, I remember it!
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:38 pmby G-Tech Corporation
Kisinger wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:Yeah, I'm trying to limit a need for post barriers tied to an OP, and might appoint a Co-Op or two to deal with battles and tech progression. Should be interesting.
The Civilization thingy?
The one where I was the Mongols without the horses? And we had weird swamp people too.... You know, it's really old now but, I remember it!
Ahhh, right. I remember that. A bit more freeform than that, with luck.
Posted:
Sun Jul 05, 2015 4:39 pmby Kisinger
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Kisinger wrote:The one where I was the Mongols without the horses? And we had weird swamp people too.... You know, it's really old now but, I remember it!
Ahhh, right. I remember that. A bit more freeform than that, with luck.
Okay :3
Posted:
Mon Jul 06, 2015 12:00 amby Emilio Aguinaldo
I should just surprise everyone with a new rp because I seem to always get commitment issues when I announce I am making one.
Posted:
Mon Jul 06, 2015 10:09 amby Reatra
Emilio Aguinaldo wrote:I should just surprise everyone with a new rp because I seem to always get commitment issues when I announce I am making one.
•_•
Y gy
Posted:
Mon Jul 06, 2015 10:49 amby Senkaku
The Jonathanian States wrote:"A discussion about the naming conventions of Sperm" - A play in three parts, as presented to you by the Historicals.
A little part of me just died, but this is still funny enough to go into my sig.
Posted:
Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:04 amby The Jonathanian States
Senkaku wrote:The Jonathanian States wrote:"A discussion about the naming conventions of Sperm" - A play in three parts, as presented to you by the Historicals.
A little part of me just died, but this is still funny enough to go into my sig.
I'm glad you find my work amusing.
Yay! I'm in a sig.
.svg){kind=link}
