Page 1 of 7

NS House of Cards - Character RP [Senate]

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:54 pm
by Bujahla
Membership of the Senate:
Image

Image
To:
United States Congress,
[House or Senate], United States of America



Date: [Insert Date]

112th Congress, 1st Session, S.[Go anywhere from 100 up]


[Name of Bill]





Preamble


[Insert it here ((This section should provide your reasons for the necessity of your bill. Why is your topic something that should be addressed by the government? This section's clauses should always begin with a "Whereas..."))]

Body


[Divide into Section's and Subsections to explain your bill((Keep in mind that Resolutions,Acts, and Joint Resolutions are different in structure. Refer to the differences below on how to properly do it))]

Enactment Clause


[Insert here((EACH BILL MUST HAVE AN ENACTMENT CLAUSE!! The enactment clause tells your fellow congressmen when your bill will take effect if passed. It may specify a future date (September 30, 2005) or a certain number of days following the passage of the bill (60 days after passage). Enactment dates within 30 days of passage are used for EMERGENCY legislation only. Enactment dates more than 90 days after passage is used for most legislation and is the enactment period for normal legislation.))]

Signed,

[Insert your Name]
[Position in Congress ((THIS IS NOT SENATOR OR REP, IT IS LIKE SPEAKER OF HOUSE, IF YOU DON'T HAVE A TITLE THEN PUT THE STATE YOUR REPRESENTING AND YOUR NAME. EXAMPLE: Arkansas Senator]


Resolutions

A Resolution is a non-binding legislative measure generally used to express an opinion, set Congressional rules, or offer an award/recognition. The House of Representatives may pass a House Resolution by simple majority vote. The Senate may pass a Senate Resolution by simple majority vote. And the Congress can pass a Concurrent Resolution if both Houses approve that resolution by simple major it vote. Congress presents Resolutions to the President, but these resolutions hold no legal authority, and the President does not sign or veto these resolutions.

IN THE [HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES/SENATE] OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, [Mr/Mrs.] [Yourname((EX: Chuck))], for himself [and cosponsors, if any], offers A RESOLUTION To [say whatever the resolution says]. BE IT RESOLVED by [the House of Representatives/Senate] of the United States:

Section 1. Title.

This bill will be known and cited as the House/Senate Example Resolution of 2018.

Section 2. Sense of Congress.

It is the Sense of Congress that Brett Kingsley is the sexiest man on Earth.

Section 3. Award.

Congress does hereby award to Brett Kingsley the "Sexiest Man Alive" award.


IN THE [HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES/SENATE] OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, [Mr/Mrs.] [Yourname((EX: Chuck))], for himself [and cosponsors, if any], offers A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION To [say whatever the resolution says]. BE IT CONCURRENTLY RESOLVED by the House of Representatives and Senate of the United States in Congress Assembled:

Section 1. Title.

This bill will be known and cited as the Example Concurrent Resolution of 2018.

Section 2. Sense of Congress.

It is the Sense of Congress that Brett Kingsley is the sexiest man on Earth.

Section 3. Award.

Congress does hereby award to Brett Kingsley the "Sexiest Man Alive" award.


Acts

An Act of Congress is a binding legislative measure used to establish or amend a law. An Act of Congress is a statute, holding the force of law once enacted. Each House of Congress must approve an Act by majority vote for it to take effect. An Act of Congress takes effect only when signed by the President or enacted via a veto override.

IN THE [HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES/SENATE] OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, [Mr/Mrs.] [Yourname((EX: Chuck))], for himself [and cosponsors, if any], offers A BILL To [do whatever the bill seeks to do]. BE IT ENACTED by the House of Representatives and Senate of the United States in Congress Assembled:

SECTION 1. TITLE, EFFECT.

(a) This bill will be known and cited as the "Example Bill Act of 2018".

(b) This bill will take effect upon its enactment.

SECTION 2. RANDOM PROVISIONS.

(a) The Secretary of State is directed to --
(1) bla;
(2) bla bla bla; and
(3) bla bla bla bla bla.

(b) The Secretary of Defense will immediately yada yada yada.


SECTION 3. MORE RANDOM PROVISIONS.
The combination of "bla bla bla" and "yada yada yada" is hereby prohibited.


Joint Resolutions

A Joint Resolution is a binding legislative measure that holds the force of law if enacted, but that is used only for specific purposes. Congress generally uses Joint Resolutions to make one-time appropriations, to issue short-term orders to the executive, to correct typos in a recently passed bill, to ask the President to veto a recently passed bill, or to setup temporary commissions/committees (such as the 9/11 commission). Congress also uses Joint Resolutions for more august purposes such as authorizing continued spending in the absence of a budget, annexing territories, and declaring war. A Joint Resolution must be passed by a majority vote in each House of Congress, and must be signed by the President (or enacted via veto override).

A Joint Resolution may also be used to amend the Constitution. A Joint Resolution proposing a constitutional amendment must pass by a 2/3 vote. The amendment then must be ratified by 3/4 the states within seven years to take effect.

IN THE [HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES/SENATE] OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, [Mr/Mrs.] [Yourname((EX: Chuck))], for himself [and cosponsors, if any], offers A JOINT RESOLUTION To [do whatever the bill seeks to do]. BE IT JOINTY RESOLVED by the House of Representatives and Senate of the United States in Congress Assembled:

SECTION 1. TITLE, EFFECT.

(a) This bill will be known and cited as the "Example Joint Resolution of 2018".

(b) This bill will take effect upon its enactment.

SECTION 2. RANDOM PROVISIONS.

(a) The Example Act of 2018 is amended such that the "iz," in Section 8 is replaced with "is".

(b) The President is requested to veto the Example Act of 2019.

SECTION 3. MORE RANDOM PROVISIONS.
Congress does hereby establish a Special Commission on Dancing to issue a report within five years detailing the best form of dancing.


Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the [legislatures or conventions] of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress, and which shall be known and cited in Congress as the "Presidential Amendment":
‘‘ARTICLE
‘‘SECTION 1. For purposes of representation in the Congress, election of the President and Vice President, and article V of this Constitution, the District constituting the seat of government of the United States shall be treated as though it were a State.
‘‘SEC. 2. The exercise of the rights and powers conferred under this article shall be by the people of the District constituting the seat of government, and as shall be provided by the Congress.
‘‘SEC. 3. The twenty-third article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
‘‘SEC. 4. This article shall be inoperative, unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission.’’

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:01 pm
by The Orson Empire
Alright guys, let's get this show on the road.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:04 pm
by Mishmahig
Senator Daniel Brent, from the great state of Ohio, checking in.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:13 pm
by Corenea
Senator Stan Stark from Kentucky checking in

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:13 pm
by Kernan
Senator Richard Ragsdale from Iowa checking in

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:14 pm
by Liecthenbourg
Senator Joe Barton from Texas reporting in.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:18 pm
by Mishmahig
So. I think we should postpone the opening of Congress for a day, which will allow for us to do general background and catch-up meetings, gauge the media reaction to this Congress, etc, and then open with a prayer for the recovery of one of our own, and a prayer in memory of those who lost their lives on this terrible day.

Also, I'll have an aide sent out immediately for a heartfelt card from her Senate colleagues -- I assume you all will want to sign it, right?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:21 pm
by Liecthenbourg
Mishmahig wrote:So. I think we should postpone the opening of Congress for a day, which will allow for us to do general background and catch-up meetings, gauge the media reaction to this Congress, etc, and then open with a prayer for the recovery of one of our own, and a prayer in memory of those who lost their lives on this terrible day.

Also, I'll have an aide sent out immediately for a heartfelt card from her Senate colleagues -- I assume you all will want to sign it, right?

I agree on all accounts.
I wish to sign the card, yes.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:24 pm
by Mishmahig
Liecthenbourg wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:So. I think we should postpone the opening of Congress for a day, which will allow for us to do general background and catch-up meetings, gauge the media reaction to this Congress, etc, and then open with a prayer for the recovery of one of our own, and a prayer in memory of those who lost their lives on this terrible day.

Also, I'll have an aide sent out immediately for a heartfelt card from her Senate colleagues -- I assume you all will want to sign it, right?

I agree on all accounts.
I wish to sign the card, yes.


Fantastic.

Senator Bachmann, as the Senate Majority Leader, I think it is only right that you lead the Senate in the prayer and the moment of silence?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:25 pm
by Jordslag
PRESIDENT CHUCK NORRIS, CHECKING IN!

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:26 pm
by The Orson Empire
Mishmahig wrote:So. I think we should postpone the opening of Congress for a day, which will allow for us to do general background and catch-up meetings, gauge the media reaction to this Congress, etc, and then open with a prayer for the recovery of one of our own, and a prayer in memory of those who lost their lives on this terrible day.

Also, I'll have an aide sent out immediately for a heartfelt card from her Senate colleagues -- I assume you all will want to sign it, right?

About the prayer.....isn't that a violation of the Constitution?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:27 pm
by Mishmahig
The Orson Empire wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:So. I think we should postpone the opening of Congress for a day, which will allow for us to do general background and catch-up meetings, gauge the media reaction to this Congress, etc, and then open with a prayer for the recovery of one of our own, and a prayer in memory of those who lost their lives on this terrible day.

Also, I'll have an aide sent out immediately for a heartfelt card from her Senate colleagues -- I assume you all will want to sign it, right?

About the prayer.....isn't that a violation of the Constitution?


I beg your pardon, Senator Akerson?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:30 pm
by Bujahla
The Orson Empire wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:So. I think we should postpone the opening of Congress for a day, which will allow for us to do general background and catch-up meetings, gauge the media reaction to this Congress, etc, and then open with a prayer for the recovery of one of our own, and a prayer in memory of those who lost their lives on this terrible day.

Also, I'll have an aide sent out immediately for a heartfelt card from her Senate colleagues -- I assume you all will want to sign it, right?

About the prayer.....isn't that a violation of the Constitution?


FTR, no. They literally just had a court case on that:
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/ca ... -galloway/

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:33 pm
by The Orson Empire
Mishmahig wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:About the prayer.....isn't that a violation of the Constitution?


I beg your pardon, Senator Akerson?

It's Arkenson, not Akerson. Bujahla messed the name up on the roster.

Anyway, if we are opening up with a prayer, then it is pretty blatant that Congress is favoring the Christian religion.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:34 pm
by The Orson Empire
Bujahla wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:About the prayer.....isn't that a violation of the Constitution?


FTR, no. They literally just had a court case on that:
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/ca ... -galloway/

This is ridiculous.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:35 pm
by Corenea
Bujahla wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:About the prayer.....isn't that a violation of the Constitution?


FTR, no. They literally just had a court case on that:
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/ca ... -galloway/

OOC wise: to be fair, just because the Supreme Court said so, it doesn't mean it's correct.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:35 pm
by Jordslag
Mishmahig wrote:So. I think we should postpone the opening of Congress for a day, which will allow for us to do general background and catch-up meetings, gauge the media reaction to this Congress, etc, and then open with a prayer for the recovery of one of our own, and a prayer in memory of those who lost their lives on this terrible day.

Also, I'll have an aide sent out immediately for a heartfelt card from her Senate colleagues -- I assume you all will want to sign it, right?

We should not postpone it. Back in Norway, my family regularly suffered attacks from Neo-Nazis and Anarchists. It would be like if we postponed healing the injuries because of the dead. We must hold it today, to show defiance to these criminals. We must also send out cards of support and apologize for failing to stop it. At least, that is my opinion. Hjen out.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:36 pm
by Mishmahig
The Orson Empire wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:
I beg your pardon, Senator Akerson?

It's Arkenson, not Akerson. Bujahla messed the name up on the roster.

Anyway, if we are opening up with a prayer, then it is pretty blatant that Congress is favoring the Christian religion.


This country was founded on the values of Abrahamic faiths, Senator. Are you suggesting that, in this terrible time, we should not pray to God to protect the souls lost on this day, and to watch over Congresswoman Giffords as the doctors work to save her life?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:13 pm
by The Orson Empire
Mishmahig wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:It's Arkenson, not Akerson. Bujahla messed the name up on the roster.

Anyway, if we are opening up with a prayer, then it is pretty blatant that Congress is favoring the Christian religion.


This country was founded on the values of Abrahamic faiths, Senator. Are you suggesting that, in this terrible time, we should not pray to God to protect the souls lost on this day, and to watch over Congresswoman Giffords as the doctors work to save her life?

*sighs and does a facepalm* The notion that this nation was founded on Christian beliefs is so blatantly false that I can't believe people still think this is true. It clearly states in the Constitution that there is a separation of church and state, and that this Congress will not favor one religion over the other.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:16 pm
by Liecthenbourg
The Orson Empire wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:
This country was founded on the values of Abrahamic faiths, Senator. Are you suggesting that, in this terrible time, we should not pray to God to protect the souls lost on this day, and to watch over Congresswoman Giffords as the doctors work to save her life?

*sighs and does a facepalm* The notion that this nation was founded on Christian beliefs is so blatantly false that I can't believe people still think this is true. It clearly states in the Constitution that there is a separation of church and state, and that this Congress will not favor one religion over the other.

"Most people in this God Fearing Country are Christians, it only makes sense that our prayer reflects that Senator Arkenson. Though, in honour of Ms Giffords and in accord with her beliefs, we could invite a Reform Judaism Rabbi as an honorary guest as Senate Chaplain. That however, could lead to the what happened in 2000 when we invited Venkatachalapathi Samuldrala to give an opening prayer, protests from some of our more extreme Christian People. Doesn't that sound like a more reasonable proposition, Senator? Or would you rather remove religion entirely from these noble halls, where its moral holdings have helped guide many of our decisions."

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:18 pm
by Mishmahig
The Orson Empire wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:
This country was founded on the values of Abrahamic faiths, Senator. Are you suggesting that, in this terrible time, we should not pray to God to protect the souls lost on this day, and to watch over Congresswoman Giffords as the doctors work to save her life?

*sighs and does a facepalm* The notion that this nation was founded on Christian beliefs is so blatantly false that I can't believe people still think this is true. It clearly states in the Constitution that there is a separation of church and state, and that this Congress will not favor one religion over the other.


"This country was most certainly founded on the Judeo-Christian beliefs the Founding Fathers held dear," Brent said, turning to face the Democrat squarely. "For the past two hundred and so years, we have been influenced massively -- by an overwhelming majority -- by good, honest, God-fearing Christians, who built this country from the ground up! To ignore that, and the history of our country, is the height of intellectual dishonesty, Senator."

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:31 pm
by Kernan
I am going to have to side with the Arkenson on this. While this country was founded by Christians it does state that there will be a separation of Church and state.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:38 pm
by Mishmahig
Kernan wrote:I am going to have to side with the Arkenson on this. While this country was founded by Christians it does state that there will be a separation of Church and state.


"I-I...I don't believe it," Daniel said, stunned. "One of our own is lying in a hospital, right now, fighting for her life, and you two are objecting to what prayer we send out to her? How....?!"

At a loss for words, he stalked off with his aides, shaking his head angrily.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:43 pm
by Kernan
Mishmahig wrote:
Kernan wrote:I am going to have to side with the Arkenson on this. While this country was founded by Christians it does state that there will be a separation of Church and state.


"I-I...I don't believe it," Daniel said, stunned. "One of our own is lying in a hospital, right now, fighting for her life, and you two are objecting to what prayer we send out to her? How....?!"

At a loss for words, he stalked off with his aides, shaking his head angrily.

I am not saying we should not pray for her, we should, just not in Congress

PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:48 pm
by The Orson Empire
Liecthenbourg wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:*sighs and does a facepalm* The notion that this nation was founded on Christian beliefs is so blatantly false that I can't believe people still think this is true. It clearly states in the Constitution that there is a separation of church and state, and that this Congress will not favor one religion over the other.

"Most people in this God Fearing Country are Christians, it only makes sense that our prayer reflects that Senator Arkenson. Though, in honour of Ms Giffords and in accord with her beliefs, we could invite a Reform Judaism Rabbi as an honorary guest as Senate Chaplain. That however, could lead to the what happened in 2000 when we invited Venkatachalapathi Samuldrala to give an opening prayer, protests from some of our more extreme Christian People. Doesn't that sound like a more reasonable proposition, Senator? Or would you rather remove religion entirely from these noble halls, where its moral holdings have helped guide many of our decisions."

How about we not pray at all? Let's just keep religion out of this. After all, this government is secular.
Mishmahig wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:*sighs and does a facepalm* The notion that this nation was founded on Christian beliefs is so blatantly false that I can't believe people still think this is true. It clearly states in the Constitution that there is a separation of church and state, and that this Congress will not favor one religion over the other.


"This country was most certainly founded on the Judeo-Christian beliefs the Founding Fathers held dear," Brent said, turning to face the Democrat squarely. "For the past two hundred and so years, we have been influenced massively -- by an overwhelming majority -- by good, honest, God-fearing Christians, who built this country from the ground up! To ignore that, and the history of our country, is the height of intellectual dishonesty, Senator."

I think it is you who is ignoring our history. It is a well known fact that many of the Founding Fathers were Deists, not Christians, senator. Also, it doesn't matter is most of the nation is Christian. We have a separation of church and state, and it is the duty of this Congress to uphold that.