Only use this for Resolution posting, not Discussion.
What you can propose?:
Investigate any situation threatening international peace;
Recommend procedures for peaceful resolution of a dispute;
Call upon other member nations to completely or partially interrupt economic relations as well as sea, air, postal, and radio communications, or to sever diplomatic relations;
Call a U.N peacekeeping mission to a place
[/list] Format for Resolutions:
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [Insert Date]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:(0-whatever)]
Preamble
[Insert it here ((This section should provide your reasons for the necessity of your resolutions. Why is your topic something that should be addressed by the United Nations?))]
What you propose?
[Divide into Section's and Subsections to explain your resolution]
What should we expect if this is enacted?
[Insert here((If this is enacted, what do you think will happen to the targeted country?))]
Signed, [Insert your Name] [Country Name ((EXAMPLE: United States of America))]
[table][td][tab=1][/tab][blocktext][floatleft][img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ysxPhp5w0JQ/T8VjYkbZinI/AAAAAAAATE8/7G5ufaKOku0/s1600/United+Nations+Security+Council.jpg[/img][/floatleft][align=right][i][b]To:[/b] United Nations, Security Council, United States of America[/i]
[Insert it here ((This section should provide your reasons for the necessity of your resolutions. Why is your topic something that should be addressed by the United Nations?))]
[i][size=150][b][align=center]What you propose?[/align][/b][/size][/i]
[Divide into Section's and Subsections to explain your resolution]
[i][size=150][b][align=center]What should we expect if this is enacted?[/align][/b][/size][/i]
[Insert here((If this is enacted, what do you think will happen to the targeted country?))]
Signed, [hr][/hr][i][u][Insert your Name][/u][/i] [b][Country Name ((EXAMPLE: United States of America))] [/b][/blocktext][tab=1][/tab][/td][/table]
Rules: Use the SPOILER tag for talking about your resolution and voting. Much more organization.
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:41 am
by The new united britsh empire
OOC: firstly, how can I apply for Observer State status within the UN. Secondly, What about General Assembly resolutions, are you going to make an official format for them as well?
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:21 am
by Waztaskio
The new united britsh empire wrote:OOC: firstly, how can I apply for Observer State status within the UN. Secondly, What about General Assembly resolutions, are you going to make an official format for them as well?
OOC: If you are not actually in the security council, put in OOC before you post you are observing and I will make a roaster of you all, secondly I didn't think we really needed a general assembly, but if we do I can make one as well
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:32 pm
by Legendardisch
We need a general assembly imho.
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:56 pm
by The Broken Russian States
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: March 1st, 2014]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:0-95321]
Preamble
The AIDZ proposed by The People's Republic of China has forced Chinese defense policies far beyond its own border into independent and sovereign nations
What you propose?
-China should decrease its AIDZ: Chinese AIDZ is very large, and I understand that China is just being cautious about its defense. -Allow Nations to ask China for defense: As China has many allies that it can put AIDZ on without violating other nation's airspace, countries that border China may ask China to put its AIDZ around their nation -Allow Nations to decline China's AIDZ: Nations should be allowed to decline China's AIDZ over their predetermined Air Space, and that China must oblige by such a decline -Allow China to Deny putting AIDZ over other nations: Should a nation ask for the AIDZ to be over them, China should be allowed to decline putting it over them. (IE. Russia asks for AIDZ, China says no)
What should we expect if this is enacted?
China may still be allowed to increase AIDZ without violating sovereign airspace.
Signed, Peter Wittig Federal Republic of Germany
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:29 pm
by Legendardisch
Resolution 030314 - 0263172
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [March 3th, 2014]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:0263172]
Preamble
NOTICING the recent influx of German spending in military HORRIFIED that this action might cause instability in European Mainland
What you propose?
1. Investigation A UN Investigation group will investigate the Germans massively spenditure on defence 2. Protection The UN will raise readiness in The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark, Poland, France, Swiss, Italy and other bordering nations to Germany 3. Sanctions UN Members will sanction Germany in this action, wheter its political, economic or militaristic
What should we expect if this is enacted?
Germany will stop the sudden increase of military spending.
Signed, Frans Timmermans, Minister of Foreign Affairs The United Kingdom of The Netherlands
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [March 3th, 2014]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:0263172]
Preamble
NOTICING the recent influx of German spending in military HORRIFIED that this action might cause instability in European Mainland
What you propose?
1. Investigation A UN Investigation group will investigate the Germans massively spenditure on defence 2. Protection The UN will raise readiness in The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark, Poland, France, Swiss, Italy and other bordering nations to Germany 3. Sanctions UN Members will sanction Germany in this action, wheter its political, economic or militaristic
What should we expect if this is enacted?
Germany will stop the sudden increase of military spending.
Signed, Frans Timmermans, Minister of Foreign Affairs The United Kingdom of The Netherlands
Germany votes Abstained
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:52 pm
by Waztaskio
The President opens up Resolution Number:0-95321 for discussion regarding China AIDZ policy. Please begin sending in votes, and opinions on the resolution.
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:06 pm
by Limborg
Waztaskio wrote:The President opens up Resolution Number:0-95321 for discussion regarding China AIDZ policy. Please begin sending in votes, and opinions on the resolution.
The new united britsh empire wrote:OOC: firstly, how can I apply for Observer State status within the UN. Secondly, What about General Assembly resolutions, are you going to make an official format for them as well?
OOC: If you are not actually in the security council, put in OOC before you post you are observing and I will make a roaster of you all, secondly I didn't think we really needed a general assembly, but if we do I can make one as well
OOC: please do make a general assembly.
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:00 pm
by The Broken Russian States
OOC: Sorry, I didn't realize that you had to open voting.
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:44 am
by Alleniana
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [March 13th]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:(0696969?)]
Preamble
RECOGNISING that bombings have occurred in Kabul that are not typical of Al-Qaeda's actions
HOPING that rumours that Pakistan has been involved are untrue
PROPOSING that UN investigators are sent to find out the details of the event
What you propose?
1. UN investigators will be sent to Kabul and Islamabad, and all other areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan within reason to find out if Pakistan has ties with the bombers 2. UN investigators will be granted free, unbiased and unfettered access within reason to the areas they desire to see 3. UN investigators will not be molested, pestered or harassed in their duty for any reason to the best of UN abilities in reason 4. UN investigators will be unbiased and internationally recognised experts working to find out the exact causes and perpetrators of the blast
What should we expect if this is enacted?
1. Should Pakistan's government be found to have had connections, sanctions and internationally agreed penalties will be levied on them by the UN 2. Should Pakistanis but not the government be found to have connections with the bombing, they will be punished and controlled as is necessary, and further measures put in to prevent it in future. 3. Should other governments or entities be believed to have connections, investigators will be sent to those places or people to investigate further. 4. Should no connections be found, the investigators will withdraw 5. Should other circumstances occur, the UN will decide further the case via further propositions
Signed, [David Cameron on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II Regina's Government of theUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)]
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:10 am
by Mifan
Waztaskio wrote:The President opens up Resolution Number:0-95321 for discussion regarding China AIDZ policy. Please begin sending in votes, and opinions on the resolution.
Egypt Abstains
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:14 am
by Alleniana
Upon Resolution 095321, the UK abstains, due to the fact China may pressure its allies into accepting AIDZ, but also as the proposal has other merits Upon Resolution 0263172, the UK says aye, as it is good sense to limit military expansion in a peaceful time
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:39 am
by The Miaphysite Church of Coptic Archism
Pakistan votes nay to resolution 0-95321, and abstains to resolution 0263172.
In regards to resolution 0696969, Pakistan votes nay, as ISI investigation has already revealed the Pakistani groups involved in the bombing, rendering a new investigation pointless. Pakistan instead offers to release all it's investigation notes publicly to prove the legitimacy of the investigation, and if necessary, release those involved to face international courts.
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 5:41 am
by Legendardisch
The Netherlands vote nay for resolution 0-95321
The Netherlands vote Abstain for resolution 0696969
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:06 am
by Waztaskio
The United States spokeperson stands up and speaks.
"United States Abstains from Resolution 095321. Although we may disagree with it, I believe their may be other ways we can go about getting this resolved."
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 10:34 am
by The Broken Russian States
Germany votes Abstained to resolution 0696969
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:41 am
by Graknopia
"The People's Republic of China votes Nay to resolution 0-95321, Yay to resolution 0263172, and Nay to resolution 0696969."
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:32 pm
by UED
The Republic of Korea votes Aye on 095321, believing Chinese aggression in the region has to be stopped. The Republic of Korea votes Aye on 0263172 The Republic of Korea abstains on 0696969
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:36 pm
by Limborg
•Germany Military Buildup Resolution: 0263172 The Islamic Republic of Iran Abstains
•Kabul Bombings Resolution: 0696969 The Islamic Republic of Iran votes No
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:14 pm
by Forty Twoania
Spain Votes NAY on the proposal about the Chinese AIDZ due to the resolution failing to address the possibility of China pressuring other governments to comply with Chinese demands. We believe that China should not be allowed to expand it's AIDZ as it is already large enough to allow China to successfully defended it's self from any aggression by sea.
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 6:02 pm
by The Broken Russian States
On the resolution of German Military Build-Up, Peter Wittig stands up and says: Germany has already decreased the amount, making this resolution non-applicable
On the resolution regarding China's AIDZ, Peter speaks: The countries with the guts to stand up to China will no give into pressure. South Korea and Japan will not be pressured by China, of whom this resolution aims to help. Any other country, for example The Federation of Russia, will also not give in to Chinese pressure.
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 7:16 pm
by Waztaskio
With the Chinese Veto on two bills, we move on to the German military buildup.
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 7:17 pm
by Waztaskio
The United States votes NAY the Germany Military Buildup, as we feel it will not be adqueate enough to enforce the demands if China refuses.
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:56 am
