Limborg wrote: Why? The resolution can be edited you know, and i'm sure the UK would be happy about it, they wouldn't want Iranian soldiers staying in Syria
(We want Iran to be entirely uninvolved; not a single Iranian soldier. The resolution specifically gives an excuse for Iranian 'liberation'. Now, no more OOC in IC.)
This sort of thing should be discussed here, in the OOC it would get lost. Anyways, ture the resolution says that. but on the other hand, if the resolution doesn't passes the Iranian troops won't leave. Iran already whiped out most of the rebels and terrorists so its already to late to whine about Iranian troops. As the UK you should have done that a long time ago.
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:30 am
by Ptolemais
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [19 May 2014]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:(0-10156844)]
Preamble
RECOGNIZING the danger of igniting a global conflict by unilaterally invading other states
COMMITTED to solving issues through diplomacy and not violence
APPALLED at the ease with which Russia and Iran have violated the sovereignty of other states in blatant contravention of international law
DEMANDING that such actions be condemned and the aggressors immediately cease fire and return to negotiations
What you propose?
s1. Russia and Iran will immediately halt military operations in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar or other recently invaded Middle Eastern states
s2. Russia, Iran and other affected states will immediately convene an emergency conference after hostilities have ceased in a neutral country to be determined by all parties.
s3. A ceasefire will be drafted up and no territory will be lost to any state involved in the conflict, returning to status quo ante bellum.
s4. If the above conditions are met, the UN will assist affected states and no further action will be taken by the Security Council against the aggressors.
s5. If the above conditions are not met, the UN will immediately dispatch a peacekeeping force to guarantee the sovereignty of the victim states.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
If this resolution is enacted, Russia and Iran will either cease hostilities with no further repercussions or be faced with a UN peacekeeping force in combat if they persist their advances.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [19 May 2014]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:(0-10156844)]
Preamble
RECOGNIZING the danger of igniting a global conflict by unilaterally invading other states
COMMITTED to solving issues through diplomacy and not violence
APPALLED at the ease with which Russia and Iran have violated the sovereignty of other states in blatant contravention of international law
DEMANDING that such actions be condemned and the aggressors immediately cease fire and return to negotiations
What you propose?
s1. Russia and Iran will immediately halt military operations in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar or other recently invaded Middle Eastern states
s2. Russia, Iran and other affected states will immediately convene an emergency conference after hostilities have ceased in a neutral country to be determined by all parties.
s3. A ceasefire will be drafted up and no territory will be lost to any state involved in the conflict, returning to status quo ante bellum.
s4. If the above conditions are met, the UN will assist affected states and no further action will be taken by the Security Council against the aggressors.
s5. If the above conditions are not met, the UN will immediately dispatch a peacekeeping force to guarantee the sovereignty of the victim states.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
If this resolution is enacted, Russia and Iran will either cease hostilities with no further repercussions or be faced with a UN peacekeeping force in combat if they persist their advances.
Signed, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe JAPAN
The Islamic Republic of Iran votes No, Sating that multiple solutions cannot be solved by one resolution. The resolution also lacks action against the countries that are being invaded. Iran will not retreat unless these countries get punished for their actions.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [19 May 2014]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:(0-10156844)]
Preamble
RECOGNIZING the danger of igniting a global conflict by unilaterally invading other states
COMMITTED to solving issues through diplomacy and not violence
APPALLED at the ease with which Russia and Iran have violated the sovereignty of other states in blatant contravention of international law
DEMANDING that such actions be condemned and the aggressors immediately cease fire and return to negotiations
What you propose?
s1. Russia and Iran will immediately halt military operations in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar or other recently invaded Middle Eastern states
s2. Russia, Iran and other affected states will immediately convene an emergency conference after hostilities have ceased in a neutral country to be determined by all parties.
s3. A ceasefire will be drafted up and no territory will be lost to any state involved in the conflict, returning to status quo ante bellum.
s4. If the above conditions are met, the UN will assist affected states and no further action will be taken by the Security Council against the aggressors.
s5. If the above conditions are not met, the UN will immediately dispatch a peacekeeping force to guarantee the sovereignty of the victim states.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
If this resolution is enacted, Russia and Iran will either cease hostilities with no further repercussions or be faced with a UN peacekeeping force in combat if they persist their advances.
Signed, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe JAPAN
Germany votes Nay, and recommends a modification to this to be more fair to the Russian Federation.
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:43 pm
by Ptolemais
Japan would be open to suggestions for revisions, but urges haste as many people are currently dying and the world is on the brink of war.
So far, the resolution allows for no consequences for Iran/Russia for their actions if they immediately stop offensive operations and proceed with negotiations. What further concessions are needed to halt the conflict and pass this resolution?
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:48 pm
by The Broken Russian States
Ptolemais wrote:Japan would be open to suggestions for revisions, but urges haste as many people are currently dying and the world is on the brink of war.
So far, the resolution allows for no consequences for Iran/Russia for their actions if they immediately stop offensive operations and proceed with negotiations. What further concessions are needed to halt the conflict and pass this resolution?
Peter Wittig stands up, and speaks: The Consequences toward the Federation of Russia and Iran are fine, however, the effects of the treaty on the nations is much too weak, Germany, a now peaceful nation, for the most part anyway, is restricted to military numbers that are far from sufficient in today's world. These nations must A: Restrict military numbers or not have a standing military. and B: Force all terrorist style forces out of the country.
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:01 pm
by Waztaskio
The President pushes through the Somaliland Resolution: 042136942, allowing Somaliland to be accepted by the UN. And moves on to the latest topics.
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:02 pm
by The Broken Russian States
Waztaskio wrote:The President pushes through the Somaliland Resolution: 042136942, allowing Somaliland to be accepted by the UN. And moves on to the latest topics.
You must come back to the IC we need help
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:05 pm
by Waztaskio
The United States Ambassador opens up.
"The USA does recognize the problem that this posses to the region, and does wish to action to come for those that tend to do it a injustice, but this resolution lacks how exactly this will be plotted out, and what will happen to the countries that were invaded? As this is mainly just a direct action against Russia and Iran, we need to draw up how to actually bring the other states in the region in line with this as well. And for that, the United States Abstains".
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:11 pm
by Ptolemais
Waztaskio wrote:The United States Ambassador opens up.
"The USA does recognize the problem that this posses to the region, and does wish to action to come for those that tend to do it a injustice, but this resolution lacks how exactly this will be plotted out, and what will happen to the countries that were invaded? As this is mainly just a direct action against Russia and Iran, we need to draw up how to actually bring the other states in the region in line with this as well. And for that, the United States Abstains".
"With all due respect, Japan directs the American representative to Section 5 for how the resolution will be implemented. Countries that were invaded will have their original borders restored, by a UN peacekeeping force if necessary. A neutral country will mediate talks between affected parties. Japan pleads for the international community to act now, the finer details can be worked out once we get all parties to cease fire and talking. As it stands now, civilian casualties are mounting."
Waztaskio wrote:The United States Ambassador opens up.
"The USA does recognize the problem that this posses to the region, and does wish to action to come for those that tend to do it a injustice, but this resolution lacks how exactly this will be plotted out, and what will happen to the countries that were invaded? As this is mainly just a direct action against Russia and Iran, we need to draw up how to actually bring the other states in the region in line with this as well. And for that, the United States Abstains".
"With all due respect, Japan directs the American representative to Section 5 for how the resolution will be implemented. Countries that were invaded will have their original borders restored, by a UN peacekeeping force if necessary. A neutral country will mediate talks between affected parties. Japan pleads for the international community to act now, the finer details can be worked out once we get all parties to cease fire and talking. As it stands now, civilian casualties are mounting."
"We are looking to the Economic situation of it all. Even if we do step in, there is nothing here to compensate either side for their losses, it is just to stop the foreign troops, and if necessary bring war from a international effort into a region that may not want it. So hence, we wish to abstain".
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:13 pm
by The Broken Russian States
This proposal has been removed, simply because the actions this applied to have been retconned by the OPs
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:05 pm
by The Polarian Empire
Australia votes Nay for the Chinese Air Defense zone due to China having more than needed.
Australia votes Aye for the Dutch cry for less German power in the EU.
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:13 pm
by Cyllea
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: May 24, 2014
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:05242014]
Preamble
To end the oppression of the Venezuelan people, overthrow a tyrant, ensure South American oil stability and save the lives of embassy personnel
What you propose?
The governments of Brazil, Argentina and Peru will declare war on and invade Venezuela for the insensitive violations of international law, human rights abuse, and threats to oil stability on a global level, as well as in Latin America.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
1. The Venezuelan people are currently under oppression from a dictator who seized power during a coup. This invasion will liberate the Venezuelan people, overthrow the dictator of Venezuela and return democracy and freedom to Venezuela.
2. Embassy staff in Venezuela are currently being held hostage by the Venezuelan military. This invasion will free the hostages and have them returned to their own country.
3. The Venezuelan crisis has caused significant oil instability throughout South America. This invasion will restore oil stability to Latin America and allow oil trade to begin between Venezuela and other nations in Latin America.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: May 24, 2014
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:05242014]
Preamble
To end the oppression of the Venezuelan people, overthrow a tyrant, ensure South American oil stability and save the lives of embassy personnel
What you propose?
The governments of Brazil, Argentina and Peru will declare war on and invade Venezuela for the insensitive violations of international law, human rights abuse, and threats to oil stability on a global level, as well as in Latin America.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
1. The Venezuelan people are currently under oppression from a dictator who seized power during a coup. This invasion will liberate the Venezuelan people, overthrow the dictator of Venezuela and return democracy and freedom to Venezuela.
2. Embassy staff in Venezuela are currently being held hostage by the Venezuelan military. This invasion will free the hostages and have them returned to their own country.
3. The Venezuelan crisis has caused significant oil instability throughout South America. This invasion will restore oil stability to Latin America and allow oil trade to begin between Venezuela and other nations in Latin America.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: May 16th, 2014
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:0-98126534]
Preamble
The Peace talks between Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Germany are under a threat of a terrorist attack. As well as the peace summit between the Russian Federation and the Various Middle Eastern Countries, as well as NATO.
What you propose?
Section I: A: The areas of the peace talks will considered attack-free zones, and should be armed by UN peacekeeping troups B: The UN peacekeeping troops can not be troop from a nation in the negotiations. Section II: Attacking these areas will result in a peacekeeping mission targeted at the area who attacked the summits.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
The peace talks should go peacefully, and if attacked, the United Nations will launch peace operations to avenge the attacks
Signed, Peter Wittig The Federal Republic of Germany
The Republic of Ireland votes Nay due to Germany's interference in bilateral affairs of which they have no affair in within sufficient legal boundaries.
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:45 pm
by Graknopia
"The government of China abstains from the Russo-Iranian UN resolution."
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: May 24, 2014
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:05242014]
Preamble
To end the oppression of the Venezuelan people, overthrow a tyrant, ensure South American oil stability and save the lives of embassy personnel
What you propose?
The governments of Brazil, Argentina and Peru will declare war on and invade Venezuela for the insensitive violations of international law, human rights abuse, and threats to oil stability on a global level, as well as in Latin America.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
1. The Venezuelan people are currently under oppression from a dictator who seized power during a coup. This invasion will liberate the Venezuelan people, overthrow the dictator of Venezuela and return democracy and freedom to Venezuela.
2. Embassy staff in Venezuela are currently being held hostage by the Venezuelan military. This invasion will free the hostages and have them returned to their own country.
3. The Venezuelan crisis has caused significant oil instability throughout South America. This invasion will restore oil stability to Latin America and allow oil trade to begin between Venezuela and other nations in Latin America.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: May 24, 2014
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:05242014]
Preamble
To end the oppression of the Venezuelan people, overthrow a tyrant, ensure South American oil stability and save the lives of embassy personnel
What you propose?
The governments of Brazil, Argentina and Peru will declare war on and invade Venezuela for the insensitive violations of international law, human rights abuse, and threats to oil stability on a global level, as well as in Latin America.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
1. The Venezuelan people are currently under oppression from a dictator who seized power during a coup. This invasion will liberate the Venezuelan people, overthrow the dictator of Venezuela and return democracy and freedom to Venezuela.
2. Embassy staff in Venezuela are currently being held hostage by the Venezuelan military. This invasion will free the hostages and have them returned to their own country.
3. The Venezuelan crisis has caused significant oil instability throughout South America. This invasion will restore oil stability to Latin America and allow oil trade to begin between Venezuela and other nations in Latin America.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: [19 May 2014]
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:(0-10156844)]
Preamble
RECOGNIZING the danger of igniting a global conflict by unilaterally invading other states
COMMITTED to solving issues through diplomacy and not violence
APPALLED at the ease with which Russia and Iran have violated the sovereignty of other states in blatant contravention of international law
DEMANDING that such actions be condemned and the aggressors immediately cease fire and return to negotiations
What you propose?
s1. Russia and Iran will immediately halt military operations in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar or other recently invaded Middle Eastern states
s2. Russia, Iran and other affected states will immediately convene an emergency conference after hostilities have ceased in a neutral country to be determined by all parties.
s3. A ceasefire will be drafted up and no territory will be lost to any state involved in the conflict, returning to status quo ante bellum.
s4. If the above conditions are met, the UN will assist affected states and no further action will be taken by the Security Council against the aggressors.
s5. If the above conditions are not met, the UN will immediately dispatch a peacekeeping force to guarantee the sovereignty of the victim states.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
If this resolution is enacted, Russia and Iran will either cease hostilities with no further repercussions or be faced with a UN peacekeeping force in combat if they persist their advances.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: May 24, 2014
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:05242014]
Preamble
To end the oppression of the Venezuelan people, overthrow a tyrant, ensure South American oil stability and save the lives of embassy personnel
What you propose?
The governments of Brazil, Argentina and Peru will declare war on and invade Venezuela for the insensitive violations of international law, human rights abuse, and threats to oil stability on a global level, as well as in Latin America.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
1. The Venezuelan people are currently under oppression from a dictator who seized power during a coup. This invasion will liberate the Venezuelan people, overthrow the dictator of Venezuela and return democracy and freedom to Venezuela.
2. Embassy staff in Venezuela are currently being held hostage by the Venezuelan military. This invasion will free the hostages and have them returned to their own country.
3. The Venezuelan crisis has caused significant oil instability throughout South America. This invasion will restore oil stability to Latin America and allow oil trade to begin between Venezuela and other nations in Latin America.
Romania ABSTAINS for both issues currently on vote, and will wait for the voting to end before beginning to vote.
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:42 pm
by Alleniana
Resolution Number: 05242014 UK votes nay, as war will never help anything. The UK would not approve of any foreign military intervention except by resolution-approved UN peacekeepers.
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America
Date: May 24, 2014
United Nations Security Session
[Resolution Number:05242014]
Preamble
To end the oppression of the Venezuelan people, overthrow a tyrant, ensure South American oil stability and save the lives of embassy personnel
What you propose?
The governments of Brazil, Argentina and Peru will declare war on and invade Venezuela for the insensitive violations of international law, human rights abuse, and threats to oil stability on a global level, as well as in Latin America.
What should we expect if this is enacted?
1. The Venezuelan people are currently under oppression from a dictator who seized power during a coup. This invasion will liberate the Venezuelan people, overthrow the dictator of Venezuela and return democracy and freedom to Venezuela.
2. Embassy staff in Venezuela are currently being held hostage by the Venezuelan military. This invasion will free the hostages and have them returned to their own country.
3. The Venezuelan crisis has caused significant oil instability throughout South America. This invasion will restore oil stability to Latin America and allow oil trade to begin between Venezuela and other nations in Latin America.
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:27 am