NationStates

France has no qualms with anyone at the moment.

Keznov wrote:France has no qualms with anyone at the moment.

Yes, France does, Napoleon massacred hundreds of thousands of Prussians, Austrians, Brits, Russians and other Germanic states. Many people look for revenge, that is why Germany invaded France in World War 1.

Alouite wrote:

Keznov wrote:France has no qualms with anyone at the moment.

Yes, France does, Napoleon massacred hundreds of thousands of Prussians, Austrians, Brits, Russians and other Germanic states. Many people look for revenge, that is why Germany invaded France in World War 1.

No Germany invaded because France was allied to Russia who was at war with Germany.

Alouite wrote:

Keznov wrote:France has no qualms with anyone at the moment.

Yes, France does, Napoleon massacred hundreds of thousands of Prussians, Austrians, Brits, Russians and other Germanic states. Many people look for revenge, that is why Germany invaded France in World War 1.

No buddy, you don't know history too well do you...the German Empire and the French Republic were brought to war against each other due to interlocking alliances. Namely that France was allied to Russia, whom Germany had declared war on for mobilizing. Russia had done this to protect Serbia, which Austria had attacked after the ultimatum was rejected. Germany was Austria's ally and had came in. There you have it, the start of WWI in two lines.

Also, I would like to point out, for the fifth(?), maybe sixth, time that the Napoleonic Wars ended a quarter of a century ago and that the very same government leading France is the one that was actively against Napoleon. May I again note that France was on fine terms with most of Europe, the exception being Prussia and somewhat United Kingdom, though the latter is mainly do to them being rivals for the position of "Policeman of Europe".

Keznov wrote:

Alouite wrote:Yes, France does, Napoleon massacred hundreds of thousands of Prussians, Austrians, Brits, Russians and other Germanic states. Many people look for revenge, that is why Germany invaded France in World War 1.

No buddy, you don't know history too well do you...the German Empire and the French Republic were brought to war against each other due to interlocking alliances. Namely that France was allied to Russia, whom Germany had declared war on for mobilizing. Russia had done this to protect Serbia, which Austria had attacked after the ultimatum was rejected. Germany was Austria's ally and had came in. There you have it, the start of WWI in three lines.

Also, I would like to point out, for the fifth(?), maybe sixth, time that the Napoleonic Wars ended a quarter of a century ago and that the very same government leading France is the one that was actively against Napoleon. May I again note that France was on fine terms with most of Europe, the exception being Prussia and somewhat United Kingdom, though the latter is mainly do to them being rivals for the position of "Policeman of Europe".

Your right, bad call, but EP already told me no need to rub it around, I confused it with a quote that made it seem that way. I always knew that I hadn't been the best with WW1 but looks like I will have to completely re-study the era. The little I knew on WW1 was slightly misinformed. But that smack to the face aside, the nations of Europe would never so quickly forgive another for such a massive invasion. I apologize for my misinformation, and will not speak of the 1910's-20's until I fix this. Regardless I don't see how that changes the fact that the French did indeed invade Prussia, Russia, and Austria as well as some other Germanic States, nor that it went to combat with every major European power and won at least one. Such scars to a nations reputation would be remembered to say the least. Again I am sorry for my misinformed comment and will revise the era. May I remind you for the First time that a quarter of a century is not long enough to remove those scars.

On the other hand, you could be considered (in the RP) the enemy of Prussia, Bavaria, and the Netherlands. I hope you do not take my comments offensively to you,( other than my lesser knowledge of WW1) though I would appreciate it if you wouldn't try to bash me but instead constructively correct me. Sorry for the misinformation and I hope we can move on from this.

Keznov wrote:

Alouite wrote:Yes, France does, Napoleon massacred hundreds of thousands of Prussians, Austrians, Brits, Russians and other Germanic states. Many people look for revenge, that is why Germany invaded France in World War 1.

No buddy, you don't know history too well do you...the German Empire and the French Republic were brought to war against each other due to interlocking alliances. Namely that France was allied to Russia, whom Germany had declared war on for mobilizing. Russia had done this to protect Serbia, which Austria had attacked after the ultimatum was rejected. Germany was Austria's ally and had came in. There you have it, the start of WWI in two lines.

Also, I would like to point out, for the fifth(?), maybe sixth, time that the Napoleonic Wars ended a quarter of a century ago and that the very same government leading France is the one that was actively against Napoleon. May I again note that France was on fine terms with most of Europe, the exception being Prussia and somewhat United Kingdom, though the latter is mainly do to them being rivals for the position of "Policeman of Europe".

Well I just didn't want to be dragged into a war with my northern neighbors while fighting the ottomans. That is why declined the alliance offer.

Alouite wrote:

Keznov wrote:
No buddy, you don't know history too well do you...the German Empire and the French Republic were brought to war against each other due to interlocking alliances. Namely that France was allied to Russia, whom Germany had declared war on for mobilizing. Russia had done this to protect Serbia, which Austria had attacked after the ultimatum was rejected. Germany was Austria's ally and had came in. There you have it, the start of WWI in three lines.

Also, I would like to point out, for the fifth(?), maybe sixth, time that the Napoleonic Wars ended a quarter of a century ago and that the very same government leading France is the one that was actively against Napoleon. May I again note that France was on fine terms with most of Europe, the exception being Prussia and somewhat United Kingdom, though the latter is mainly do to them being rivals for the position of "Policeman of Europe".

Your right, bad call, but EP already told me no need to rub it around, I confused it with a quote that made it seem that way. I always knew that I hadn't been the best with WW1 but looks like I will have to completely re-study the era. The little I knew on WW1 was slightly misinformed. But that smack to the face aside, the nations of Europe would never so quickly forgive another for such a massive invasion. I apologize for my misinformation, and will not speak of the 1910's-20's until I fix this. Regardless I don't see how that changes the fact that the French did indeed invade Prussia, Russia, and Austria as well as some other Germanic States, nor that it went to combat with every major European power and won at least one. Such scars to a nations reputation would be remembered to say the least. Again I am sorry for my misinformed comment and will revise the era. May I remind you for the First time that a quarter of a century is not long enough to remove those scars.

On the other hand, you could be considered (in the RP) the enemy of Prussia, Bavaria, and the Netherlands. I hope you do not take my comments offensively to you,( other than my lesser knowledge of WW1) though I would appreciate it if you wouldn't try to bash me but instead constructively correct me. Sorry for the misinformation and I hope we can move on from this.

I've got no qualms with you...I put things rudely sometimes

Epraria wrote:

Alouite wrote:Looks like the campaign has been successful lately.

In Serbia and bosnia yes but again my army in Rumania was routed and destroyed. I can't have victories all the time as you know.

Stop spelling Romania "Rumania". I have not seen rum in Romania at all.

HorusLand wrote:

Epraria wrote:In Serbia and bosnia yes but again my army in Rumania was routed and destroyed. I can't have victories all the time as you know.

Stop spelling Romania "Rumania". I have not seen rum in Romania at all.

Sorry

I had to leave for the entire afternoon, and couldn't finish the map. I might have to leave tomorrow, too.
Minor delay only, for anyone who's wondering.

Anyone gonna post I wrote to Bavaria and Austria, though neither responded.

When is the OP getting on?

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:When is the OP getting on?

No-one knows; he is allowing the rp to slow

Alouite wrote:

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:When is the OP getting on?

No-one knows; he is allowing the rp to slow

I need to ask him if I am allow to change of ruler or not...

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:

Alouite wrote:No-one knows; he is allowing the rp to slow

I need to ask him if I am allow to change of ruler or not...

You mean like have yours die or stage an internal coup?

Alouite wrote:

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
I need to ask him if I am allow to change of ruler or not...

You mean like have yours die or stage an internal coup?

Like just change to another family member of the Royal Family. The queen at that time was 10, and I don't feel comfortable knowing that a little kid is ruling Spain and all its colonies...

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:

Alouite wrote:
You mean like have yours die or stage an internal coup?

Like just change to another family member of the Royal Family. The queen at that time was 10, and I don't feel comfortable knowing that a little kid is ruling Spain and all its colonies...

I think since you control Spain that that is up to you, but you can double check if you want.

I officially want to ask Russia and Austria to let me unite all of Romania into one. In exchange, Romania would help with the war against the Ottomans, and whatever other plans the two countries would have, to show our gratitude.

Yes, this sounds IC-ish. No, it isn't.

Le map is done. Have I missed anything?

Austria should own Bohemia as it has for three hundred years...I also see no reason why Russia and Prussia should have deformed borders...It should be a historical map of 1840 par what the OP has added on...

Keznov wrote:Austria should own Bohemia as it has for three hundred years...I also see no reason why Russia and Prussia should have deformed borders...It should be a historical map of 1840 par what the OP has added on...

Deformed as in? I tried to replicate the borders from the OP map as much as I could. Nothing.
Adding to that, Prussia has most of Northern Germany, which it didn't on the RL map of 1840. So, it doesn't have the same borders as in the OP map.
Changing Bohemia now....

HorusLand wrote:Le map is done. Have I missed anything?
(Image)

I have the historical Austrian empire plus most of northern Italy.

Epraria wrote:

HorusLand wrote:Le map is done. Have I missed anything?
(Image)

I have the historical Austrian empire plus most of northern Italy.

Yes, you do. That's why you have the historical Austrian empire plus most of northern Italy on the map. Right?

HorusLand wrote:

Epraria wrote:I have the historical Austrian empire plus most of northern Italy.

Yes, you do. That's why you have the historical Austrian empire plus most of northern Italy on the map. Right?

Eh no I for example don't have Bohemia in that map. Plus most of northern italy is probably more than what is on the Map.

Epraria wrote:

HorusLand wrote:Yes, you do. That's why you have the historical Austrian empire plus most of northern Italy on the map. Right?

Eh no I for example don't have Bohemia in that map. Plus most of northern italy is probably more than what is on the Map.

Okay. Editing now.