Advertisement
by New Corenea » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:00 am
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:03 am
New Corenea wrote:I'm not a huge fan of welfare, I believe that welfare just keep the poor at the poor instead of raising them up.
by Battlion » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:17 am
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:New Corenea wrote:I'm not a huge fan of welfare, I believe that welfare just keep the poor at the poor instead of raising them up.
I somewhat agree. I think there should be welfare, but I think it should have a process to getting it. As of right now, it is easier to get welfare than a job; it should be the other way around. When a person receives welfare, the respective authorities should make sure that that person really needs it, because I have seen a lot of people who abuse the welfare system too much.
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:20 am
Battlion wrote:The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
I somewhat agree. I think there should be welfare, but I think it should have a process to getting it. As of right now, it is easier to get welfare than a job; it should be the other way around. When a person receives welfare, the respective authorities should make sure that that person really needs it, because I have seen a lot of people who abuse the welfare system too much.
Contributory welfare changes this, you literally get out what you put in. If you put in more you get more, this is fair and allows those who don't put things into the system to get enough they need but encourages working at the same time as obviously you can still be welfare and have a job such as most parents who receive child benefit despite working.
I don't agree we shouldn't have Welfare, it's important we have some sort of net. Contributory Welfare is a radical idea and is used in so many countries that it'd be something that we can look at and see if we can improve.
by Battlion » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:30 am
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:Battlion wrote:
Contributory welfare changes this, you literally get out what you put in. If you put in more you get more, this is fair and allows those who don't put things into the system to get enough they need but encourages working at the same time as obviously you can still be welfare and have a job such as most parents who receive child benefit despite working.
I don't agree we shouldn't have Welfare, it's important we have some sort of net. Contributory Welfare is a radical idea and is used in so many countries that it'd be something that we can look at and see if we can improve.
I never really said that we shouldn't have welfare. I do agree with your view
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:45 am
by Battlion » Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:45 am
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:Battlion wrote:
I was sort of addressing New Corena as well but I was aiming to answer the abuse point
Did you read the demos publication?
When I said "abuse" I meant abuse. Nothing else. Truth of the fact is that our welfare system is being abused; but I referred to our current welfare system, not the one you are proposing
by New Corenea » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:10 am
by Battlion » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:12 am
New Corenea wrote:Oh yeah, I decided to form a faction within the party that values centre-right ideologies (mainly conservatism and libertarianism). I call this faction the Whigs.
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:16 am
New Corenea wrote:Oh yeah, I decided to form a faction within the party that values centre-right ideologies (mainly conservatism and libertarianism). I call this faction the Whigs.
by The National Liberal Party » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:23 am
Senate President pro Tempore wrote:Environment & Energy
To deal with issues pertinent to the Environment and Energy ministries
CURRENTLY AT VOTE
- National Park Service Establishment Act - Free Vote
- Cork Oak Preservation Act - Free Vote
- Loggerhead Turtle Protection Act - Free Vote
- The Animal Protection Force - Two Line Whip FOR
- Animal Protection Act - Free Vote
- National Preservation of Wilderness and Wildlife Act - Free Vote
- Littering Prevention Act - Free Vote
- National Forestry Services Act - Free Vote
by New Corenea » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:26 am
by Battlion » Sat Aug 10, 2013 3:13 pm
Battlion wrote:Another idea I believe we could look at is the idea of Prepaid cards, the money from benefits put into one card and once the money Is gone it is gone. It would also allow local authorities to see where the money is being spent and whether it is being spent on necessity's and not things like drugs or other illegal products.
This could save a lot of administrative cost and move the whole system onto online for one, they put an end to the paper-based auditing system associated with personal budgets.
Users have their personal budgets loaded on to a card, which they use like a debit card to purchase the services and items outlined in their care plan. Local authorities can see what's being spent in real time – checking to see that a person's spending matches their care plan, blocking it if financial abuse is suspected or if it gets lost or stolen, or investigating if a person isn't spending at all.
by The Nihilistic view » Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:23 pm
New Corenea wrote:Oh yeah, I decided to form a faction within the party that values centre-right ideologies (mainly conservatism and libertarianism). I call this faction the Whigs.
by The Nihilistic view » Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:33 pm
by New Corenea » Sat Aug 10, 2013 9:04 pm
by Seitonjin » Sat Aug 10, 2013 9:51 pm
New Corenea wrote:Hmmm, I don't know where to stand. It seems to give more data power to the government
by Lamaredia » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:10 pm
by Lamaredia » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:31 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement