NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate (OLD THREAD, DO NOT POST)

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:37 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:And I find the cross pattern to be unrepresentative of this nation.

Senator, quite a few senators have already voiced support for the naval ensign. And to be frank, it is just a geometrical figure of two bars. I find it ridiculous that we can't display a cross on our naval ensign because of political correctness; it's not even a Christian cross as the vertical bar is centered!

Please cite support directed specifically towards the naval ensign, Senator, for I have not seen it.

I do not ask it to be changed because of political correctiveness; I ask it to be changed because it has nothing to do with this nation. And a Christian cross does not need to be made in any specific way; Specifically, the cross presented is that of St. George.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Hippostania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8826
Founded: Nov 23, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hippostania » Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:41 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:Please cite support directed specifically towards the naval ensign, Senator, for I have not seen it.

I do not ask it to be changed because of political correctiveness; I ask it to be changed because it has nothing to do with this nation. And a Christian cross does not need to be made in any specific way; Specifically, the cross presented is that of St. George.

Support for the flags was clearly expressed a dozen pages ago.

And what do you mean a cross doesn't symbolize our history? So far, we don't even have an official history.
Factbook - New Embassy Program
Economic Right: 10.00 - Social Authoritarian: 2.87 - Foreign Policy Neoconservative: 9.54 - Cultural Liberal: -1.14
For: market liberalism, capitalism, eurofederalism, neoconservatism, British unionism, atlanticism, LGB rights, abortion rights, Greater Israel, Pan-Western federalism, NATO, USA, EU
Against: communism, socialism, anarchism, eurosceptism, agrarianism, Swiss/Irish/Scottish/Welsh independence, cultural relativism, all things Russian, aboriginal/native American special rights

Hippo's Political Party Rankings (updated 21/7/2013)

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:44 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Please cite support directed specifically towards the naval ensign, Senator, for I have not seen it.

I do not ask it to be changed because of political correctiveness; I ask it to be changed because it has nothing to do with this nation. And a Christian cross does not need to be made in any specific way; Specifically, the cross presented is that of St. George.

Support for the flags was clearly expressed a dozen pages ago.

And what do you mean a cross doesn't symbolize our history? So far, we don't even have an official history.

The flags, plural. No support was shown, specifically, for that naval ensign.

Precisely. Thus, a cross does not symbolize it. Nor does it have anything to do with the navy, for that matter.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:45 pm

I must ask, what does flags have to do with senatorial limitation act?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:22 pm

Having been fifthed, the National Security Act is lodged in queue:
Trotskylvania wrote:
National Security Act
Urgency: Paramount | Sponsor: Trotskylvania


Findings and Policies

§ 1: As a fledgling nation, Aurentina has faced problems with national identity. With a divided electorate, and a number of legitimate concerns arising over the growth of partisan and other militias in the country, it is paramount that as part of organizing a government, the security of the people of the nation is protected.

While external threats have been minimal, and as of yet there is no evidence to suggest that the various militias intend an armed putsch against the government, their existence highlights another problem. Presently, law enforcement and security are the responsibility of local communities. Local police are increasingly inadequate in a highly mobile, globalized society.

Establishment of executive authority

§ 2: (a) A Ministry of Justice shall be established, under the aegis of the Council of Ministers, headed by a Minister of Justice.
(1) This act shall not abridge the right of local communities to establish their own police forces; However:
(2) The Ministry of Justice shall be responsible for implementing national policy regarding criminal justice (including but not limited to prosecution, public defense, incarceration, and rehabilitation), and regulating the conduct of both the National Police Force as established under Section 3, and the various local police forces.
(3) The Ministry of Justice shall be responsible for regulating the conduct of partisan militias according to law enacted by the Senate.

(b) A Ministry of Defense shall be established, under the aegis of the Council of Ministers, headed by a Minister of Defense.
(1) Nothing in this authorization shall be understood to conflict with the prerogative, established under the Republican Executive Act, of the President to act as commander-in-chief of the nation's armed forces.
(2) The Ministry of Defense shall be responsible for implementing defense policy regarding the uniformed armed forces established under Section 4, as enacted by the Council of Ministers.

National Police

§ 3: (a) The National Police Force [NPF] shall be established to protect against breaches of the peace, protect public safety and enforce criminal law.
(1) The NPF shall be governed by a Public Safety Commission appointed by the Ministry of Justice.
(2) Hiring for the NPF shall be conducted by a non-partisan Civil Service Commission, hereby established by this act as an independent government agency under the supervision of the Council of Ministers and the Senate.

(b) This act authorizes NPF to have universal jurisdiction over the entire nation, as well as any embassies established on foreign soil. As per this law, local police forces are required to cooperate with the NPF, and all matters that involve multiple local jurisdictions shall be the primary responsibility of the NPF.

National Defense Force

§ 4: (a) The National Defense Force (NDF) shall be established to protect against foreign invasion and insurrection.
(1) The NDF shall be divided into an Army, Navy, and Air Force.
(2) The NDF shall be an all volunteer military, and no provision of this act shall allow conscription except during times of war. Conscription may only be authorized by Senate resolution during times when a state of war has been declared.
(3) The NDF shall not be used for domestic law enforcement except upon the declaration of a national state of emergency by the Senate.
(4) NDF personnel shall not be quartered in private homes without the consent of the occupants.
(5) The NDF is presently authorized to hold a maximum strength of 200,000 uniformed officers and enlisted persons.




tl;dr : Something more important than whether or not we have private militias.

Please resume debate on the Senatorial Limitations Act.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:30 pm

I move to re-resubmit the Senatorial Limitation Act in the Coffee Shop until the Senate finally comes to an agreement when a capacity limit should be implemented.

User avatar
The Treorai
Senator
 
Posts: 3706
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Treorai » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:31 pm

Aeken wrote:I move to re-resubmit the Senatorial Limitation Act in the Coffee Shop until the Senate finally comes to an agreement when a capacity limit should be implemented.

Seconded.
GOD-KING OF ABRASIVENESS

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.

Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.

Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.

User avatar
Demphor
Senator
 
Posts: 3528
Founded: Jun 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Demphor » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:33 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Aeken wrote:I move to re-resubmit the Senatorial Limitation Act in the Coffee Shop until the Senate finally comes to an agreement when a capacity limit should be implemented.

Seconded.

I oppose, the threat of parliamentary groups and the security of the country is far more serious then the Senatorial Limitation Act.
Get money out of politics, join Wolf PAC
iiWikiNational Anthem of Demphor
“When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?"
~ John Maynard Keynes

User avatar
Maklohi Vai
Minister
 
Posts: 2959
Founded: Jan 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Maklohi Vai » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:33 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Aeken wrote:I move to re-resubmit the Senatorial Limitation Act in the Coffee Shop until the Senate finally comes to an agreement when a capacity limit should be implemented.

Seconded.

Thirded
"For the glory of our people, we govern our nation freely. For the glory of Polynesia, we help and strengthen our friends. For the glory of the earth, we do not destroy what it has bestowed upon us."
Demonym: Vaian
-Kamanakai Oa'a Pani, first president of Maklohi Vai
-6.13/-8.51 - as of 7/18
Hosted: MVBT 1; WBC 27; Friendly Cups 7, 9; (co-) NSCAA 5
Former President, WBC; WBC Councillor
Senator Giandomenico Abruzzi, Workers Party of Galatea
Administrator
Former:
Head Administrator
Beto Goncalves, Chair, CTA
Abraham Kamassi, Chair, Labour Party of Elizia
President of Calaverde Eduardo Bustamante; Leader, LDP
President of Baltonia Dovydas Kanarigis; Leader, LDP
President of Aurentina Wulukuno Porunalakai; Leader, Progress Coa.

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:35 pm

Demphor wrote:
The Treorai wrote:Seconded.

I oppose, the threat of parliamentary groups and the security of the country is far more serious then the Senatorial Limitation Act.

I'm saying kick it out of the queue to move in the other bills, because at this time, when the Senate is young and still growing, the capacity will have to flux until it reaches a balance.

User avatar
Demphor
Senator
 
Posts: 3528
Founded: Jun 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Demphor » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:36 pm

Aeken wrote:
Demphor wrote:I oppose, the threat of parliamentary groups and the security of the country is far more serious then the Senatorial Limitation Act.

I'm saying kick it out of the queue to move in the other bills, because at this time, when the Senate is young and still growing, the capacity will have to flux until it reaches a balance.

Then never mind,
Fourthed
Get money out of politics, join Wolf PAC
iiWikiNational Anthem of Demphor
“When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?"
~ John Maynard Keynes

User avatar
Saliu
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 483
Founded: Dec 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Saliu » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:48 pm

Well the senate has really mucked this up! I'd like to propose Take IV.

I KNOW IT MAY SEEM STUPID BUT:

It means that we can have the limit of senators that we want but also means we don't eject people who are already senators for being 'over the limit'.

Ahhhhhh...perfect harmony!

Senatorial Limitation Act, Take IV

Section 1: Definitions
Senator - an official member of the NSG Senate who has applied and has been approved
first-come, first-served basis - the first applicant who applies after a Senator's removal to be accepted shall take the place of said former Senator

Section 2: Purpose
The purpose of this Act is to promote stability and efficiency within the Senate and to prevent turmoil.

Section 3: Provisions
A. The number of official senators shall not exceed 100*.

i. No senator that is already appointed shall be dismissed on the grounds of being over the senatorial limit.

B. If any Senator is unable to carry out his or her duties due to ejection from the Senate or any other reason provided by the Constitution of the Senate as written in Act I, a new Senator shall take his/her place by first-come, first-served basis, provided the ejected Senator does not follow the procedure outlined in subsection C within fifteen (15) days of ejection.

C. Any Senator who has been ejected for the first time shall be given a period of fifteen (15) days to complete point i of the following, and he/she must then follow the remaining steps:

i. Re- apply for a Senatorial seat

ii. Be re- accepted into the NSG Senate

iii. Actively participate in Senate proceedings as defined the in the Constitution of the Senate as written in Act I.

D. Any Senator who has been readmitted into the Senate via the steps outlined in section 3, subsection C, points i and ii but who does not follow point iii shall again face ejection, and should said Senator be again ejected, he/she is forever banned from re- applying to the NSG Senate.

*Change to whatever you want. The ideal number.


We really should have enacted a provisional limit from the start...but oh-well!
I respect your beliefs and do not expect you to follow mine - I request the same from you.


    Grand Excellency (Head of State) - Hanzen Marki
    Prime Chairman (Head of Government) - Marcus Deliah
    Parliamentary Chairman (Deputy Head of Government) - Arnold Pete'sport
    Chairperson (Minister) of Foriegn Affairs - Quince Carmon
The Demonym of Saliu is Saliuzien

Have an Embassy with Saliu!

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:55 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Please cite support directed specifically towards the naval ensign, Senator, for I have not seen it.

I do not ask it to be changed because of political correctiveness; I ask it to be changed because it has nothing to do with this nation. And a Christian cross does not need to be made in any specific way; Specifically, the cross presented is that of St. George.

Support for the flags was clearly expressed a dozen pages ago.

And what do you mean a cross doesn't symbolize our history? So far, we don't even have an official history.

We must vote on the flags. Simply expressing support means nothing.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:38 pm

East Vlaricstan wrote:
Divair wrote:Do you think it would be possible to include the implementation of a national bird in this bill? If so, I would recommend the tit:
Image


Also, a national name and capital.


And a definition of our territory, and cultural heritage.

Hippostania wrote:
Glasgia wrote:
In my history chapter, a while back in the organisation thread, I called the nation a a name given by the romans (greek in brackets): Aurentina (Arentinous) and the capital Aurentina Marrittima (Aurentinos Thallassios).

Not to mention my map proposal that I originally made for a puppet of mine but that could still be used for Aurentina.


I do not support Senator Glasgia's proposed history of Auretina.

I would also prefer if the map used standard American English characters, so as to be more accessible to typing out for those of us whose keyboards don't support accent marks and other symbols.

Would also be nice if there were a continental landmass...

Ceannairceach wrote:
Hippostania wrote:You mean a swallowtailed flag with a red block in the hoist? I personally find it to be much less unique than the cross-pattern that I proposed.

And I find the cross pattern to be unrepresentative of this nation.


I find it hard to determine what is and what is not unrepresentative of this nation when we don't know what exactly our cultural heritage is.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
The Treorai
Senator
 
Posts: 3706
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Treorai » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:53 pm

Limiting Legislation Act
Urgency: Utmost

Drafted By: The Treorai
Sponsor(s): Imperiatom, Hathradic States, Beta Test.


BELIEVING That in a democratic society, Basic Human Rights should be defended,
APPALLED At the fact that some politicians would seek to violate the basic human rights of the citizens of our nation,
DEFINES A "Citizen" as any registered member of our nation.
FURTHER DEFINES Basic Human Rights As;
(1) The right for all born humans to live,
(2) The right to free speech,
(3) The right to free thought,
(4) The right to actively participate in government
(5) The right to free expression,
(6) The right to a jury of peers in a justice system to be created by the senate,
(7) Freedom of and from Religion,
(8) The right to own firearms and ammunition, subject to reasonable restrictions for public safety,
FURTHER BELIEVES That the Senate has no place violating these aforementioned rights of our citizens,
PREVENTS Legislation suppressing the speech, thought, and general expression of citizens,
DICTATES No Person is above the law, and all people must adhere to it,
FURTHER DICTATES Thoughts and speech harmful, or seditious in nature are not protected by this act,
ALSO DEFINES "Harmful or Seditious in nature" as slander, personal information not belonging to they who utter the information, sensitive information, open threats against another person, and threats of open rebellion, or terrorism against our nation.
ALSO DICTATES This act does not protect those using other people's work without permission of the owner,
ESTABLISHES This as the official Bill of Rights of our Nation.


I would also like to move to debate this Act immediately, as our government lacks a bill of rights, and it should be our highest priority to insure the freedom of our citizens.
Last edited by The Treorai on Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:45 pm, edited 3 times in total.
GOD-KING OF ABRASIVENESS

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.

Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.

Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:55 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Limiting Legislation Act
Urgency: Utmost

Drafted By: The Treorai
Sponsor(s): Imperiatom, Hathradic States, Beta Test.


BELIEVING That in a democratic society, Basic Human Rights should be defended,
APPALLED At the fact that some politicians would seek to violate the basic human rights of the citizens of our nation,
DEFINES A "Citizen" as any registered member of our nation.
FURTHER DEFINES Basic Human Rights As;
(1) The right for all born humans to live,
(2) The right to free speech,
(3) The right to free thought,
(4) The right to actively participate in government
(5) The right to free expression through writing, drawing, assembly, and press,
(6) The right to a jury of peers in a justice system to be created by the senate,
(7) Freedom of and from Religion,
(8) The right to own firearms and ammunition, subject to reasonable restrictions for public safety,
FURTHER BELIEVES That the Senate has no place violating these aforementioned rights of our citizens,
PREVENTS Legislation suppressing the speech, thought, and general expression of citizens,
DICTATES No Person is above the law, and all people must adhere to it,
FURTHER DICTATES Thoughts and speech harmful, or seditious in nature are not protected by this act,
ALSO DEFINES "Harmful or Seditious in nature" as slander, personal information not belonging to they who utter the information, sensitive information, open threats against another person, and threats of open rebellion, or terrorism against our nation.
ALSO DICTATES This act does not protect those using other people's work without permission of the owner,
ESTABLISHES This as the official Bill of Rights of our Nation.


I would also like to move to debate this Act immediately, as our government lacks a bill of rights, and it should be our highest priority to insure the freedom of our citizens.

Seconded.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Imperiatom
Minister
 
Posts: 2416
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperiatom » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:55 pm

Divair wrote:
Hippostania wrote:But nooo, I thought that National Symbols Act was next:

National Symbols Act

Urgency: High
Drafted by: Hippostania (Ind.)

RECOGNIZING the need for distinctive national flag and national coat of arms, in addition to distinctive ensigns to be used at sea and various other flags of lesser importance.
FORMALIZING the following symbols as the official national symbols:

NATIONAL AND CIVIL FLAG shall be a horizontal tricolor of black, white and blue.
STATE FLAG shall be a horizontal tricolor of black, white and blue charged with the lesser coat of arms moved 1/3 towards the hoist.
WAR FLAG shall be a red field with the state flag in the canton, charged with two crossed swords.

CIVIL ENSIGN shall be a swallowtailed horizontal tricolor of black, white and blue.
STATE ENSIGN shall be a swallowtailed horizontal tricolor of black, white and blue charged with the lesser coat of arms moved 1/3 towards the hoist.
NAVAL ENSIGN shall be a white field with a red cross, with the state flag in the canton.

NAVAL JACK shall be a square-shaped, with the lesser coat of arms charged on a blue field, fimbriated by white and black outlines.
STANDARD OF THE HEAD OF STATE shall be a stylized heraldic banner of the lesser coat of arms.
STANDARD OF THE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT shall be a blue field charged with the greater coat of arms fimbriated with white.

LESSER COAT OF ARMS shall consist of a blue shield with a white star, surrounded by twenty smaller stars in the top, with bottom-left side consisting of a red field with a white hammer, and bottom-right side consisting of a black field with a white laurel leaf.
GREATER COAT OF ARMS shall in addition to the above include a mural crown on top of the shield, two national flags in supporters, flanked by two laurel leaves and with the motto "Democratia, Sensibilitate, Libertas" in the compartment

Attachment:
Image

Image

Image

Image

Do you think it would be possible to include the implementation of a national bird in this bill? If so, I would recommend the tit:
Image



Ah good. Something i can shoot.

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:56 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Limiting Legislation Act
Urgency: Utmost

Drafted By: The Treorai
Sponsor(s): Imperiatom, Hathradic States, Beta Test.


BELIEVING That in a democratic society, Basic Human Rights should be defended,
APPALLED At the fact that some politicians would seek to violate the basic human rights of the citizens of our nation,
DEFINES A "Citizen" as any registered member of our nation.
FURTHER DEFINES Basic Human Rights As;
(1) The right for all born humans to live,
(2) The right to free speech,
(3) The right to free thought,
(4) The right to actively participate in government
(5) The right to free expression through writing, drawing, assembly, and press,
(6) The right to a jury of peers in a justice system to be created by the senate,
(7) Freedom of and from Religion,
(8) The right to own firearms and ammunition, subject to reasonable restrictions for public safety,
FURTHER BELIEVES That the Senate has no place violating these aforementioned rights of our citizens,
PREVENTS Legislation suppressing the speech, thought, and general expression of citizens,
DICTATES No Person is above the law, and all people must adhere to it,
FURTHER DICTATES Thoughts and speech harmful, or seditious in nature are not protected by this act,
ALSO DEFINES "Harmful or Seditious in nature" as slander, personal information not belonging to they who utter the information, sensitive information, open threats against another person, and threats of open rebellion, or terrorism against our nation.
ALSO DICTATES This act does not protect those using other people's work without permission of the owner,
ESTABLISHES This as the official Bill of Rights of our Nation.


I would also like to move to debate this Act immediately, as our government lacks a bill of rights, and it should be our highest priority to insure the freedom of our citizens.




I second this motion. This proposal is vital to our nation's future as it ensures the basic rights of our citizens are guaranteed.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22257
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:59 pm

I third the motion.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Demphor
Senator
 
Posts: 3528
Founded: Jun 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Demphor » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:00 pm

Fifth (we have 5 now)
Get money out of politics, join Wolf PAC
iiWikiNational Anthem of Demphor
“When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?"
~ John Maynard Keynes

User avatar
The Treorai
Senator
 
Posts: 3706
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Treorai » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:03 pm

So let debate on the Limiting Legislation Act begin.

In defense of clause 8 defining basic human rights, I made it vague to allow legislation as to what exactly these "Reasonable Restrictions" are in the future. I just put it there to make sure people will have the right to have firearms.
GOD-KING OF ABRASIVENESS

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.

Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.

Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.

User avatar
Maklohi Vai
Minister
 
Posts: 2959
Founded: Jan 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Maklohi Vai » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:04 pm

Senators, voting cannot begin now, as there is a queue for bills to be debated. We are currently debating the limitation act, I believe.
"For the glory of our people, we govern our nation freely. For the glory of Polynesia, we help and strengthen our friends. For the glory of the earth, we do not destroy what it has bestowed upon us."
Demonym: Vaian
-Kamanakai Oa'a Pani, first president of Maklohi Vai
-6.13/-8.51 - as of 7/18
Hosted: MVBT 1; WBC 27; Friendly Cups 7, 9; (co-) NSCAA 5
Former President, WBC; WBC Councillor
Senator Giandomenico Abruzzi, Workers Party of Galatea
Administrator
Former:
Head Administrator
Beto Goncalves, Chair, CTA
Abraham Kamassi, Chair, Labour Party of Elizia
President of Calaverde Eduardo Bustamante; Leader, LDP
President of Baltonia Dovydas Kanarigis; Leader, LDP
President of Aurentina Wulukuno Porunalakai; Leader, Progress Coa.

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:05 pm

Maklohi Vai wrote:Senators, voting cannot begin now, as there is a queue for bills to be debated. We are currently debating the limitation act, I believe.



Yes, we are.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:09 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Limiting Legislation Act
Urgency: Utmost

Drafted By: The Treorai
Sponsor(s): Imperiatom, Hathradic States, Beta Test.


BELIEVING That in a democratic society, Basic Human Rights should be defended,
APPALLED At the fact that some politicians would seek to violate the basic human rights of the citizens of our nation,
DEFINES A "Citizen" as any registered member of our nation.
FURTHER DEFINES Basic Human Rights As;
(1) The right for all born humans to live,
(2) The right to free speech,
(3) The right to free thought,
(4) The right to actively participate in government
(5) The right to free expression through writing, drawing, assembly, and press,
(6) The right to a jury of peers in a justice system to be created by the senate,
(7) Freedom of and from Religion,
(8) The right to own firearms and ammunition, subject to reasonable restrictions for public safety,
FURTHER BELIEVES That the Senate has no place violating these aforementioned rights of our citizens,
PREVENTS Legislation suppressing the speech, thought, and general expression of citizens,
DICTATES No Person is above the law, and all people must adhere to it,
FURTHER DICTATES Thoughts and speech harmful, or seditious in nature are not protected by this act,
ALSO DEFINES "Harmful or Seditious in nature" as slander, personal information not belonging to they who utter the information, sensitive information, open threats against another person, and threats of open rebellion, or terrorism against our nation.
ALSO DICTATES This act does not protect those using other people's work without permission of the owner,
ESTABLISHES This as the official Bill of Rights of our Nation.


I would also like to move to debate this Act immediately, as our government lacks a bill of rights, and it should be our highest priority to insure the freedom of our citizens.

You should add freedom from censorship of the internet.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:17 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Limiting Legislation Act
Urgency: Utmost

Drafted By: The Treorai
Sponsor(s): Imperiatom, Hathradic States, Beta Test.


BELIEVING That in a democratic society, Basic Human Rights should be defended,
APPALLED At the fact that some politicians would seek to violate the basic human rights of the citizens of our nation,
DEFINES A "Citizen" as any registered member of our nation.
FURTHER DEFINES Basic Human Rights As;
(1) The right for all born humans to live,
(2) The right to free speech,
(3) The right to free thought,
(4) The right to actively participate in government
(5) The right to free expression through writing, drawing, assembly, and press,
(6) The right to a jury of peers in a justice system to be created by the senate,
(7) Freedom of and from Religion,
(8) The right to own firearms and ammunition, subject to reasonable restrictions for public safety,
FURTHER BELIEVES That the Senate has no place violating these aforementioned rights of our citizens,
PREVENTS Legislation suppressing the speech, thought, and general expression of citizens,
DICTATES No Person is above the law, and all people must adhere to it,
FURTHER DICTATES Thoughts and speech harmful, or seditious in nature are not protected by this act,
ALSO DEFINES "Harmful or Seditious in nature" as slander, personal information not belonging to they who utter the information, sensitive information, open threats against another person, and threats of open rebellion, or terrorism against our nation.
ALSO DICTATES This act does not protect those using other people's work without permission of the owner,
ESTABLISHES This as the official Bill of Rights of our Nation.


I would also like to move to debate this Act immediately, as our government lacks a bill of rights, and it should be our highest priority to insure the freedom of our citizens.


Opposed on the grounds that the freedom of expression clause is too specific, and not vague enough.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads