[PASSED] Repeal: Liberate Singapore

[Consular]

OOC: You don't have to be so snarky and condescending about it. I had no way of knowing that before you posted that link.

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=395820#p30481220

Had myself a genuine chuckle.

For.

[Drasnia]

Hey. One question before I vote. Why didn't the WA delegate for Singapore propose this?

Often, stuff like this is supported by the natives but they leave writing the actual text of the proposal to people more knowledgeable in the intricacies of the Security Council.

[Stellonia]

OOC: You don't have to be so snarky and condescending about it. I had no way of knowing that before you posted that link.

All I said was "ahem". If you think my decision to speak at all makes me snarky, then the problem lies in you, and not in me. The post above me is also a rather appropriate response.

I suggest CD actually spend five seconds looking for evidence of native support before giving up.

The word "ahem" sounds a bit condescendingly sarcastic, at least when spoken.

Also, it's pretty difficult to find evidence of Singapore's support for this. Only one post regarding this was made on its RMB, and that was three hours ago.

[Sea Lion]

All I said was "ahem". If you think my decision to speak at all makes me snarky, then the problem lies in you, and not in me. The post above me is also a rather appropriate response.

I suggest CD actually spend five seconds looking for evidence of native support before giving up.

The word "ahem" sounds a bit condescendingly sarcastic, at least when spoken.

Also, it's pretty difficult to find evidence of Singapore's support for this. Only one post regarding this was made on its RMB, and that was three hours ago.

viewtopic.php?p=30481220#p30481220

[Stellonia]

The word "ahem" sounds a bit condescendingly sarcastic, at least when spoken.

Also, it's pretty difficult to find evidence of Singapore's support for this. Only one post regarding this was made on its RMB, and that was three hours ago.

viewtopic.php?p=30481220#p30481220

Yes, but there's no indication that "Bathor" is affiliated with Singapore.

[Drasnia]

viewtopic.php?p=30481220#p30481220

Yes, but there's no indication that "Bathor" is affiliated with Singapore.

What about the fact they are the delegate of the region?

[Stellonia]

Yes, but there's no indication that "Bathor" is affiliated with Singapore.

What about the fact they are the delegate of the region?

I mean from their forum post. No "As delegate of Singapore, I support this" or even a signature.

[Wallenburg]

viewtopic.php?p=30481220#p30481220

Yes, but there's no indication that "Bathor" is affiliated with Singapore.

You must be fucking kidding me.

[Altmoras]

Hey. One question before I vote. Why didn't the WA delegate for Singapore propose this?

I've done quite a bit of coordination with the natives of Singapore regarding their regional defense, and in one of these discussions the need to repeal the liberation was mentioned, I offered to write the repeal myself and they happily accepted.

[Kaboomlandia]

It's going to be close, but this proposal is making a serious run at the all-time voting margin record for either council, currently held by Repeal "Liberate The Arab League", at 94.2%.

*knock on wood*

[Stellonia]

It's going to be close, but this proposal is making a serious run at the all-time voting margin record for either council, currently held by Repeal "Liberate The Arab League", at 94.2%.

*knock on wood*

On another note, this proposal's lead is so resounding that the most powerful delegate to vote for it, Plembobria of the North Pacific, has 1,261 votes, more than the total number of votes against it. The most powerful delegate against it has 21 votes, or 60 times less than the North Pacifican delegate.

[The Laurentian Federation]

Given the evidence that the region of Singapore does wish to be liberated, our delegation will be voting FOR this resolution.

Wait, if they want to be liberated, why would they repeal their liberation?

[Kaboomlandia]

Given the evidence that the region of Singapore does wish to be liberated, our delegation will be voting FOR this resolution.

Wait, if they want to be liberated, why would they repeal their liberation?

So they can password their own region and keep it safe while they rebuild.

[The Laurentian Federation]

Wait, if they want to be liberated, why would they repeal their liberation?

So they can password their own region and keep it safe while they rebuild.

Ah.

[LollerLand]

On behalf of the citizens of The Universal Allegiance, I will be voting FOR this proposal.

Lollerland
WA Delegate

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

"I voted for. Did you guys?"-Silver Zephyr

[Pallaith]

Office of the Minister of World Assembly Affairs
November 30, 2016

The native population of Singapore has returned to power with the withdrawal of raider forces, and the residents now wish to implement their own measures to secure the region. We must also not forget that the original liberation resolution was unsupported by both The North Pacific and the natives, as it contained a covert self-commendation for The Invaders. The Invaders have repeatedly attempted to use liberations and condemnations as a backhanded way of glorifying themselves and we will continue to oppose them. Security Council Resolution #209 must be repealed to allow the government of Singapore to bring security and stability to the region, and remove the taint The Invaders left behind.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.

[We Are Not the NSA]

Repeal "Liberate Singapore" was passed 17,788 votes to 1,196.