Advertisement
by Alustrian » Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:52 am
by The Stalker » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:43 pm
by Stalker Queen » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:30 am
Alustrian wrote:Complete support.
BT has plenty of accomplishments+popularity, and he does not already have a commendation largely because no one had previously made the effort to actually write it If you run a TG approval campaign and get this resolution to vote, I expect it to pass - make sure that the resolution is comprehensive and is something that he will be proud of. Many of the players in this thread know BT quite well. Make sure to fully take them up on their offers to fill in any gaps in the resolution. Spend some time sorting through forum archives to make sure you have a complete picture. I believe that BT did something similar when working on mine, and I am pleased with the result of those efforts.
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Altmoras » Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:00 pm
by Stalker Queen » Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:55 pm
Altmoras wrote:It's been four days, is this going anywhere?
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Deadeye Jack » Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:32 am
by Cormactopia II » Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:39 am
Ikania wrote:I wonder if any former Madrigal denizens would like to speak up about how Thomas and the Wardens destroyed their region and its community.
by Ikania » Sat Jul 30, 2016 8:52 am
Cormactopia II wrote:Ikania wrote:I wonder if any former Madrigal denizens would like to speak up about how Thomas and the Wardens destroyed their region and its community.
I thought that was all my fault. Or does it change when it suits you?
Full support for this proposal. I don't always support commending defenders because sometimes I think there just isn't enough substance beyond average defending to warrant it. But if there is one defender who has unquestionably earned commendation, and is far from average, it's Thomas.
by Syberis » Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:50 am
Ikania wrote:Cormactopia II wrote:I thought that was all my fault. Or does it change when it suits you?
Full support for this proposal. I don't always support commending defenders because sometimes I think there just isn't enough substance beyond average defending to warrant it. But if there is one defender who has unquestionably earned commendation, and is far from average, it's Thomas.
It's both. You can't pass the buck on this one either. I didn't include you this time because I figured I had trashed you enough already. You're a raider now anyway so it's irrelevant to the commendation, even if you'll be back to defending in two weeks, then back to raiding, etc.
Zaolat wrote:WHO THE F*** IS SYBERIS
by Stalker Queen » Sat Jul 30, 2016 6:32 pm
Deadeye Jack wrote:No need to rush it. I will be giving you some more information this weekend some time when I can write it up.
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Stalker Queen » Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:16 pm
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by We Are Not the NSA » Mon Aug 22, 2016 7:07 pm
Stalker Queen wrote:Now if I could just figure out how to format "Co-authored by Funkadelia"...[/align]
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Ryanimus » Thu Aug 25, 2016 1:42 pm
by Shizensky » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:31 am
by Stalker Queen » Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:19 pm
Ryanimus wrote:I'll be willing to act as a proxy and supply the stamps necessary for a telegram campaign supporting this commendation if necessary.
Shizensky wrote:A slight update for the sake of accuracy: Benevolent Thomas is no longer the primary Chief Executive of the Renegade Islands Alliance. I (the original Shiz) have retaken control of the nation and all associated responsibilities and authority. This does not take away from anything BT accomplished while he was in control, and rewording this in the commendation might be as simple as saying "As acting Chief Executive of Renegade Islands Alliance"
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Stalker Queen » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:29 pm
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Louisistan » Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:46 pm
That may be overstating it a little. TITO and other defender orgs have been doing this for over 10 years, though not in the same frequency as the Wardens do.First Warden and Founder of The Order of The Grey Wardens, going one step further than others of the defender cause by leading offensives to strike invader nations at their very hearts, mobilising it into the largest, most active defender force in the present era, and heralding a new age of defending to the world;
by Stalker Queen » Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:48 pm
Louisistan wrote:That may be overstating it a little. TITO and other defender orgs have been doing this for over 10 years, though not in the same frequency as the Wardens do.First Warden and Founder of The Order of The Grey Wardens, going one step further than others of the defender cause by leading offensives to strike invader nations at their very hearts, mobilising it into the largest, most active defender force in the present era, and heralding a new age of defending to the world;
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Shizensky » Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:25 am
by Funkadelia » Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:14 pm
Shizensky wrote:A difference may be that the Wardens adopted the offensive angle as a core part of their operation, whereas no other defender groups I'm aware of have advertised their willingness and mission to strike vulnerable raider regions. We've always talked about ourselves as defenders and protectors first, and we only celebrate our aggressiveness after a successful operation against raider interests. I believe that the mission of the Wardens does indeed set them apart from other defenders.
by Louisistan » Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:47 am
Shizensky wrote:A difference may be that the Wardens adopted the offensive angle as a core part of their operation, whereas no other defender groups I'm aware of have advertised their willingness and mission to strike vulnerable raider regions. We've always talked about ourselves as defenders and protectors first, and we only celebrate our aggressiveness after a successful operation against raider interests. I believe that the mission of the Wardens does indeed set them apart from other defenders.
by Stalker Queen » Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:56 am
Louisistan wrote:Shizensky wrote:A difference may be that the Wardens adopted the offensive angle as a core part of their operation, whereas no other defender groups I'm aware of have advertised their willingness and mission to strike vulnerable raider regions. We've always talked about ourselves as defenders and protectors first, and we only celebrate our aggressiveness after a successful operation against raider interests. I believe that the mission of the Wardens does indeed set them apart from other defenders.
That is true. But it's not what the proposal said, so I just thought I'd point it out.
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Shizensky » Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:36 am
Louisistan wrote:Shizensky wrote:A difference may be that the Wardens adopted the offensive angle as a core part of their operation, whereas no other defender groups I'm aware of have advertised their willingness and mission to strike vulnerable raider regions. We've always talked about ourselves as defenders and protectors first, and we only celebrate our aggressiveness after a successful operation against raider interests. I believe that the mission of the Wardens does indeed set them apart from other defenders.
That is true. But it's not what the proposal said, so I just thought I'd point it out.
Stalker Queen wrote:If you don't mind me asking... how might you suggest altering the wording?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: K7 Asteroid
Advertisement