NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Condemn Psychotic Dictatorship

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Ottoman Nogay
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Sep 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

[Draft] Condemn Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Ottoman Nogay » Wed Jul 13, 2016 6:31 am

World Assembly,

Understanding the important role of the Security Council of this in terms of creating peace,

We are confident that the Psychotic Dictatorship rob undermine communities and destroy people's rights

Psychotic Dictatorship is surprised that the area did not recognize the rights of people and countries in the region confined, such as:

- IF YOU ARE INACTIVE 20 DAYS, YOU'RE OUT! LEAVE THE REGION AND YOU'RE BANNED !, it is less restrictive regulations and create many countries disenfranchised.
- EMBASSY ALL REQUESTS WILL BE REJECTED BECAUSE WE DO NOT DEAL WITH REGIONS inferior - THAT MEANS YOU, IDIOT !, this rule makes the delegation Ambassador insulted and could lead to war.
- * NO DEMOCRACY, NO FREEDOM *, * NO MERCY, * NO WA peons, * ONLY Tyranny. This regulation does not favor the countries in the region and create a right of free speech is prohibited.


Horrified by the fact that the Psychotic Dictatorship so cruel in the regulations, and we would like to ask a few requirements:
1. Psychotic Dictatorship must change the rules that were in World Factbook Entry and the Psychotic Dictatorship asked to suspend regional activity. if these regulations adhered to the second point will not do so in the freezing area and when the third point is executed the area you will be frozen.

2. Closing the area with immediate and unconditional liberation of all prisoners in the local area Psychotic Dictatorship, as well as countries in the region will be evacuated to the Regional Europeia.

3. We will provide the opportunity for Psychotic Dictatorship leaders to change the rules with a time of 20 hari.Maka power Psychotic Dictatorship in these countries will be refunded according to the limits of the Agreement have been determined (this relates to the second point third point if violated, will be enacted the second point).

Noting that the Democratic Psychotic violated protocol has been involved in regional security, which has been clearly defined as illegal by the regulatory authorities of various global,

realizing too many rules infringed assembly world to be listed on this resolution,

Condemning the Democratic Psychotic.

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:06 am

I'm on mobile, so I can't give full analysis yet. What I do want to establish now though, and I'm asking this as a legitimate question, is whether or not English is your first language?
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:14 am

I'm likewise on my mobile, but a quick look through your proposal reveals that 75% of it is fluff. All the paragraphs relating to want you want Psychotic Dictatorship to do is wasted - the SC can only Condemn, Commend or Liberate.

The SC cannot force a nation or a region to change its behaviour. If you want to Condemn this nation then this proposal will need a lot of rewriting.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:20 am

I believe your target is Psychotic Dictatorships, and not Psychotic Dictatorship, correct?

You also need to get rid of the "we" everywhere. Proposals need to be written from the point of view of the Security Council, not the point of view of the author. For more information on this and other SC proposal rules, please refer to the rules here.
Last edited by Wrapper on Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ohioan Territory
Diplomat
 
Posts: 780
Founded: Dec 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ohioan Territory » Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:24 am

The end says, "Condemning the Democratic Psychotic," is this a typo?
Justice for East Palestine.

User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Wed Jul 13, 2016 12:04 pm

Ottoman Nogay wrote:The World Assembly,

Understanding the important role of the Security Council of this in terms of creating peace,

We are confident that the Psychotic Dictatorship robs, undermine's communities and destroys people's rights,

Psychotic Dictatorship is Surprised that the region violates the rights of people and countries confined in the region, having laws such as:

- IF YOU ARE INACTIVE 20 DAYS, YOU'RE OUT! LEAVE THE REGION AND YOU'RE BANNED !: it is less restrictive regulations and create many countries disenfranchised.
- EMBASSY ALL REQUESTS WILL BE REJECTED BECAUSE WE DO NOT DEAL WITH REGIONS inferior - THAT MEANS YOU, IDIOT !: this rule makes the delegation Ambassador insulted and could lead to war.
- * NO DEMOCRACY, NO FREEDOM *, * NO MERCY, * NO WA peons, * ONLY Tyranny.: This regulation does not favor the countries in the region and prohibits the right to free speech.


Horrified by the fact that the Psychotic Dictatorship is so cruel in its regulations, and we would like to ask a few requirements:
1. Psychotic Dictatorship must change the rules that were in World Factbook Entry and the Psychotic Dictatorship asked to suspend regional activity. if these regulations adhered to the second point will not do so in the freezing area and when the third point is executed the area you will be frozen.

2. Closing the area with immediate and unconditional liberation of all prisoners in the local area Psychotic Dictatorship, as well as countries in the region will be evacuated to the Regional Europeia.

3. We will provide the opportunity for Psychotic Dictatorship leaders to change the rules with a time of 20 hari.Maka power Psychotic Dictatorship in these countries will be refunded according to the limits of the Agreement have been determined (this relates to the second point third point if violated, will be enacted the second point).

Noting that the Psychotic Dictatorship violated protocol has been involved in regional security, which has been clearly defined as illegal by the regulatory authorities of various global,

Realizing too many rules infringed World Assembly to be listed on this resolution,

Condemning the Democratic Psychotic.

Blue means a spelling, grammar or syntax correction, Red means a Rule 4 violation, and Orange means a Rule 3 violation. Honestly, this is barely comprehensible, so I'm not even going to bother analyzing based on merit.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/

Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual

User avatar
Bedetopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 740
Founded: Nov 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Bedetopia » Fri Jul 15, 2016 3:03 pm

As one of the Lord Knights of Psychotic Dictatorships, I STRONGLY approve of this condemnation.

As DEAREST LEADER would say, we Psychotic Dictators SPIT in the face of the World Assembly and the Security Council, which are failed attempts at democracy. We SEEK this condemnation so that our evilness will be shown to the whole universe.

...

But you had to ruin everything with Engrish and wrong formatting. I really want this to be voted on the SC, so let's try to fix that draft:

You can't ask for radical change in the regional government. A condemnation is "to express shock and dismay at a nation or region", so you should develop the comments on the strict rules in the WFE. There's also the fact that we started to annex the regions of those who leave the region to found their own.
You could also use a line from a previous draft condemning us, that says that nations were driven crazy and were brainwashed by regional propaganda.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads