NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Automatically Repeal Liberations

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
Topic locked
User avatar
Ochea
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: May 26, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

[DRAFT] Automatically Repeal Liberations

Postby Ochea » Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:35 am

I have realized that many of the resolutions in the WA Security Council are just "repeal regional liberation" resolutions, and they usually end with the liberation being repealed.

Security Council Proposal: Automatically Repeal Liberations

NOTICING that resolutions that repeal regional liberations appear frequently in the Security Council;

REALIZING that such resolutions frequently slow down the Security Council and prevent some regions that have been taken over by hostile forces from receiving much need aid;

ALSO REALIZING that a region does not need a liberation resolution to remain in place after they have been liberated and are able to set entry restrictions to keep out hostile forces;

Would automatically repeal regional liberation resolutions two weeks after they have been implemented, to prevent such resolutions from frequenting the Security Council to allow it to focus on more important matters.
——|★|—— World Assembly Delegate of Nesapo ——|★|——
International News: Pres. Storm continues trade embargo against Corumon | Corumon's economy continues to fail as the country tries to become communist
"People in power want to stay in power. People in control want to maintain control." - President Ryan Storm
Top
User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:05 am

Hello, and welcome to the security council! I suggest you read the rules that a proposal must follow, found here: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8809

And inform you that the entire premise behind your proposal is an R3 violation.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/
Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual
Top
User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7395
Founded: May 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaboomlandia » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:35 am

We Are Not the NSA wrote:Hello, and welcome to the security council! I suggest you read the rules that a proposal must follow, found here: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8809

And inform you that the entire premise behind your proposal is an R3 violation.

R2, not R3.
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."
Top
User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:35 am

Actually the way it's written it's both R2 and R3.
Last edited by Bhang Bhang Duc on Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
Top
User avatar
The United Remnants of America
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: Mar 09, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby The United Remnants of America » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:38 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Actually the way it's written it's both R2 and R3.

I'd say R4 as well, since this does not represent the views of the WA.
By any means necessary. Call me URA
 Winner of 2015 Best of P2TM Awards: Best Roleplayer - War
"I would much rather be with you than against you, you're way too imaginative."
"URA New Confucius 2015."- Organized States
"Congrats. You just won the second place prize for Not Giving a Fuck. First Place, of course, always goes to Furry."
"He's an 8 Ball, DEN. You can't deal with an 8 Ball." - Empire of Donner land
"This Rp is flexible with science and so will you." - Tagali Federation
"I'm confused as to your tactic but I'll trust you." - Die erworbenen Namen
"Unfiltered, concentrated, possibly weaponized stupidity."
Thafoo, Leningrad Union: DEAT'd for your sins.
Discord: Here
Top
User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Mon Jun 20, 2016 9:07 am

The United Remnants of America wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Actually the way it's written it's both R2 and R3.

I'd say R4 as well, since this does not represent the views of the WA.

Assuming that the first paragraph isn't part of the proposal, I do not see any R4 violations.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/
Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual
Top
User avatar
The Skrall
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 101
Founded: May 24, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Skrall » Tue Jun 21, 2016 6:48 pm

Even though this proposal is against the rules, I think this is better than any of the submitted proposals in the WA right now...
"Life is simple: move ahead, conquer, secure what you have taken, and then move on."
"We all have a debt to nature due, I'll pay mine and so must you."
- Lord Tuma [Political Compass - Economy: -5.13 | Authoritarianism: 6.54]
We are a nation of silicon-based life forms that live for 1000s of years and are around 2-4 times the height of a human.
Top
User avatar
RiderSyl
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6309
Founded: Jan 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby RiderSyl » Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:09 am

The Skrall wrote:Even though this proposal is against the rules, I think this is better than any of the submitted proposals in the WA right now...


Our ambassadors have ensured your opinion is noted, on a burnable piece of parchment, with a readily available fireplace.
R.I.P. Dyakovo
Sylvia Montresor

Ashmoria
Karpathos
~ You may think I’m small, but I have a universe inside my mind. ~
Top
User avatar
The United Universe
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jun 20, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby The United Universe » Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:06 am

I'm pretty sure proposals can't change game mechanics.
Puppet of Flying Eagles

I do dumb things sometimes. Sorry
Top
User avatar
We Are Not the NSA
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby We Are Not the NSA » Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:06 pm

The United Universe wrote:I'm pretty sure proposals can't change game mechanics.

Yes, Rule 2 section C specifically says that technical issues cannot be put in SC resolutions, and Rule 3 states that SC resolutions cannot do anything other than Commend, Condemn, Liberate or Repeal.
\▼/We Are Not the NSA | Nohbdy | Eumaeus\▼/
Raiding HistorySecurity CouncilDear NativesTWP Raid

Retired Raider | He, Him, His | Bisexual
Top
User avatar
Crazy girl
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 6276
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Mon Jun 27, 2016 1:10 pm

As this is a suggestion to change game mechanics, rather than an actual proposal, this really should be in technical. Locked.
Top
Topic locked

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Advertisement

Remove ads