NationStates

I'm looking to repeal this god-awful mess for when it inevitably gets through thanks to the Lemmings.

Essentially, we are commending Vancouvia for being active in the W.A.

Active doing what? Approving illegal proposals? Please.

The people who approved that god-awful mess are also the same people who approved "Condemn the World Assembly" and, unsurprisingly, Vancouvia himself. Vancouvia also approved "Condemn the World Assembly", so god help me if he deserves a commendation.

Feel free to point out any errors, but as soon as I am finished writing this up I will go back to drafting recruitment telegrams for the next few hours until I get a few good responses. My first time, so please do tell me what I should do to fix this.

---

NOTICING that Vancouvia has approved hundreds of illegal proposals in the past,

WONDERING why the Security Council voted that Vancouvia was fit for a commendation,

ALSO wondering why Vancouvia wishes for a commendation when he tried to Condemn The World Assembly, a peaceful region that has done nothing to be condemned,

FURTHER understanding Vancouvia regularly rambles on about a non-existent WA Elite,

The World Assembly hereby repeals Commend Vancouvia.

Calm down no one's campaigning for commend vancouvia

Vancouvia wrote:Calm down no one's campaigning for commend vancouvia

Wait wait wait... there's finally a crappy proposal that even you won't approve?

Okay, great! We'll take it, it's a step in the right direction!

Wadden-Amrum wrote:I'm looking to repeal this god-awful mess for when it inevitably gets through thanks to the Lemmings.

Essentially, we are commending Vancouvia for being active in the W.A.

Active doing what? Approving illegal proposals? Please.

The people who approved that god-awful mess are also the same people who approved "Condemn the World Assembly" and, unsurprisingly, Vancouvia himself. Vancouvia also approved "Condemn the World Assembly", so god help me if he deserves a commendation.

Feel free to point out any errors, but as soon as I am finished writing this up I will go back to drafting recruitment telegrams for the next few hours until I get a few good responses. My first time, so please do tell me what I should do to fix this.

---

NOTICING that Vancouvia has approved hundreds of illegal proposals in the past,

WONDERING why the Security Council voted that Vancouvia was fit for a commendation,

ALSO wondering why Vancouvia wishes for a commendation when he tried to Condemn The World Assembly, a peaceful region that has done nothing to be condemned,

FURTHER understanding Vancouvia regularly rambles on about a non-existent WA Elite,

The World Assembly hereby repeals Commend Vancouvia.

Is this for when he does get commended? Vancouvia has done a lot of good and is sometimes questionable in why he approves every proposal.

Vancouvia wrote:Calm down no one's campaigning for commend vancouvia

YET

Vancouvia wrote:Calm down no one's campaigning for commend vancouvia

Apart from that resolution you approved.



Oh wait, I see you withdrew your approval. Nice.

EDIT:
Welp, turns out Watson was right and I was wrong. Sorry Vancouvia.

The rouge Christmas state wrote:

Wadden-Amrum wrote:I'm looking to repeal this god-awful mess for when it inevitably gets through thanks to the Lemmings.

Essentially, we are commending Vancouvia for being active in the W.A.

Active doing what? Approving illegal proposals? Please.

The people who approved that god-awful mess are also the same people who approved "Condemn the World Assembly" and, unsurprisingly, Vancouvia himself. Vancouvia also approved "Condemn the World Assembly", so god help me if he deserves a commendation.

Feel free to point out any errors, but as soon as I am finished writing this up I will go back to drafting recruitment telegrams for the next few hours until I get a few good responses. My first time, so please do tell me what I should do to fix this.

---

NOTICING that Vancouvia has approved hundreds of illegal proposals in the past,

WONDERING why the Security Council voted that Vancouvia was fit for a commendation,

ALSO wondering why Vancouvia wishes for a commendation when he tried to Condemn The World Assembly, a peaceful region that has done nothing to be condemned,

FURTHER understanding Vancouvia regularly rambles on about a non-existent WA Elite,

The World Assembly hereby repeals Commend Vancouvia.

Is this for when he does get commended? Vancouvia has done a lot of good and is sometimes questionable in why he approves every proposal.

1. http://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_pas ... /start=327

2. Indeed, it is questionable why he approves every single proposal. Just looking through the illegal proposals thread shows us a variety of proposals, quite a lot of which have Vancouvia's name on the approval list.

Wadden-Amrum wrote:

Vancouvia wrote:Calm down no one's campaigning for commend vancouvia

Apart from that resolution you approved.



Oh wait, I see you withdrew your approval. Nice.

I never approved it in the first place.

Vancouvia wrote:

Wadden-Amrum wrote:Apart from that resolution you approved.



Oh wait, I see you withdrew your approval. Nice.

I never approved it in the first place.

I disagree with that claim good sir.

Wadden-Amrum wrote:

Vancouvia wrote:
I never approved it in the first place.

I disagree with that claim good sir.

Then look through my activity Sherlock; I'm sure you can find some time when you're not posting about me in every single other WA thread

Vancouvia wrote:

Wadden-Amrum wrote:I disagree with that claim good sir.

Then look through my activity Sherlock; I'm sure you can find some time when you're not posting about me in every single other GA thread

Hmm Watson, you seem to be correct for once. I'll remove that claim.

This is also the Security Council, the GA threads tend to be irrelevant here Watson.

-

Vancouvia wrote:

Wadden-Amrum wrote:Hmm Watson, you seem to be correct for once. I'll remove that claim.

This is also the Security Council, the GA threads tend to be irrelevant here Watson.

The GA is split into the WA and the SC. Learn things before trying to correct others.

Watson, back to stage one, eh?

EDIT:
Oh, I see you are editing it to make yourself look like you are right.

I misspoke you got me there. +1 for you but you claiming that I approved the draft when I didn't is at least a +3 for me.

Don't try to manipulate the score Vancouvia, we both know there is no such thing as a scoreboard in the entire game outside of NS Stats.

Will you two either please get a room, or get back to debating the proposal?

Very well.

So, has anyone found any mistakes?

Commend Vancouvia is almost certainly not going to pass.

Tinfect wrote:Commend Vancouvia is almost certainly not going to pass.

I've prepared a shell of a proposal if it does.

Wadden-Amrum wrote:So, has anyone found any mistakes?

Aside from the obvious illegalities (read the rules, there are only four of them)? Yeah, the fact that the commendation isn't an inevitability.

The commendation is a horribly written proposal. I'm sure it will never get to quorum.

Wrapper wrote:

Wadden-Amrum wrote:So, has anyone found any mistakes?

Aside from the obvious illegalities (read the rules, there are only four of them)? Yeah, the fact that the commendation isn't an inevitability.

Please tell me which ones? I'm willing to change parts to make it legal.

Bitely wrote:The commendation is a horribly written proposal. I'm sure it will never get to quorum.

Because I don't have the same amounts of money you do?

At least I'm taking advice for it.

Plus, didn't you resign after you got expelled for having multiple nations in the WA?

Wadden-Amrum wrote:

Wrapper wrote:Aside from the obvious illegalities (read the rules, there are only four of them)? Yeah, the fact that the commendation isn't an inevitability.

Please tell me which ones? I'm willing to change parts to make it legal.

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8809

If you're not willing to read the rules I'm not willing to help you.

Wadden-Amrum wrote:

Bitely wrote:The commendation is a horribly written proposal. I'm sure it will never get to quorum.

Because I don't have the same amounts of money you do?

At least I'm taking advice for it.

No because you didn't take time to read the rules. My proposals where all legel.