Advertisement
by Wallenburg » Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:48 pm
by Povinksi » Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:52 pm
Wallenburg wrote:"As awful as Frustrated Franciscans is as a nation, the World Assembly simply can't go around denouncing every dictatorship. It's impractical and lessens the meaning of a condemnation. We reserve condemnations for those nations that have caused widespread and long-lasting damage throughout the Multiverse. The run-of-the-mill despot doesn't need one."
by Wallenburg » Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:56 pm
Povinksi wrote:Wallenburg wrote:"As awful as Frustrated Franciscans is as a nation, the World Assembly simply can't go around denouncing every dictatorship. It's impractical and lessens the meaning of a condemnation. We reserve condemnations for those nations that have caused widespread and long-lasting damage throughout the Multiverse. The run-of-the-mill despot doesn't need one."
Eh. The SC never condemns anyone but raiders these days.
by Povinksi » Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:59 pm
by Bears Armed » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:46 am
by Wallenburg » Thu Sep 24, 2015 9:50 am
Bears Armed wrote::roll:
This is really because he's trying to repeal one of the pro-abortion resolutions, isn't it?
by Povinksi » Thu Sep 24, 2015 11:59 am
by Wrapper » Thu Sep 24, 2015 12:22 pm
Povinksi wrote:He telegramed me back. He actually believes in his policies. Wow.
by Povinksi » Thu Sep 24, 2015 1:47 pm
Wrapper wrote:Povinksi wrote:He telegramed me back. He actually believes in his policies. Wow.
...and you actually believe him. Wow.
Seriously, he's got four puppets listed on his main nation. They all have different policies, he can't possibly believe in them all. FF is the only one with such poor civil rights and political freedoms, because he's role-playing it that way, for kicks. And his telegram to you? He's messing with you. Again, for kicks.
Condemnations and commendations, while written about nations per se, are more about the player behind the nations (thus the occasional inclusion of prominent puppet nations in some C&Cs; it's also a reason that the SC is more out-of-character than the GA). And, I'm just not seeing the player behind FF as doing anything remotely condemn-worthy, just because he's having some fun with an ultra-religious agenda on one of his nations, whether he believes in it or not.
Fully opposed.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:28 pm
Wallenburg wrote:"Raiders are the worst of the lot, so that makes sense. Unfortunately, some of them see condemnations as badges of honour."
Povinksi wrote:Maybe. I just feel like if this were the real world, and the UN could condemn nations, they wouldn't condemn nations who fought wars with others.
Bears Armed wrote::roll:
This is really because he's trying to repeal one of the pro-abortion resolutions, isn't it?
by The Grendels » Fri Sep 25, 2015 1:31 am
Povinksi wrote:Wrapper wrote:Yeah, it and thousands of other nations. Why condemn this one?
OoC: Well, "this one" has a prominence in global politics. This one isn't some newbie nation or "character" (OMGTKK, DEN nations, my puppets) this one actually believes what it's doing is right. Unless serial killers regularly come on this site and make nations, I highly doubt any of the uber corrupt nations would seriously implement their policies in real life.
by Wrapper » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:50 am
The Grendels wrote: (closest there was to a cannibal emoticon taste test)
by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:04 am
Okie dokiePovinksi wrote:Wrapper wrote:...and you actually believe him. Wow.
Seriously, he's got four puppets listed on his main nation. They all have different policies, he can't possibly believe in them all. FF is the only one with such poor civil rights and political freedoms, because he's role-playing it that way, for kicks. And his telegram to you? He's messing with you. Again, for kicks.
Condemnations and commendations, while written about nations per se, are more about the player behind the nations (thus the occasional inclusion of prominent puppet nations in some C&Cs; it's also a reason that the SC is more out-of-character than the GA). And, I'm just not seeing the player behind FF as doing anything remotely condemn-worthy, just because he's having some fun with an ultra-religious agenda on one of his nations, whether he believes in it or not.
Fully opposed.
Eh. So much for this. Lock the thread please.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement