[PASSED] Condemn Stujenske

by **Kaboomlandia** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:38 pm

Resolution is at 92-8 as I write this.

by **Jean Pierre Trudeau** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:39 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:Resolution is at 92-8 as I write this.

Yay?

by **RiderSyl** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:42 pm

Kaboomlandia wrote:Resolution is at 92-8 as I write this.

by **Coupy** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:15 pm

One could imagine that Stujenske may not want his condemnation; however, in the face of WALL and the rest of the GCRs' voting bloc, he'd have no chance even if he were to vote nay...

It's not like he's making decisions himself anyway. Feux's pulling him along with a leash, albeit with extreme difficulty.

by **The Drewlantian Aristocracy** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Kinda pointless and incredibly favorable to the old PRL, which many in Lazarus may not wish to instate after Stu gets kicked out. Most in Lazarus just hate how he became a tyrant and kicked people out for no reason, not because they have an overwhelming desire to have the PRL back in power.

by **Main** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:31 pm

I'm voting against solely because I feel that applause is not appropriate in a condemnation. If I am mistaken, one vote won't make a difference with the amount of support the proposal already has.

by **Crazy Fun** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:29 am

I agree! No such thing as this is allowed. A constitution is part of a nations history! It shouldn´t be tampered with or altered, without the people´s consent!

by **Elke and Elba** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:21 am

Umm, honest Rule 4(?) question. Can a nation be a "chairman"? :blink:

by **Ramaeus** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 9:12 am

Elke and Elba wrote:Umm, honest Rule 4(?) question. Can a nation be a "chairman"?

Yes. It's the PRL's title for Delegate.

by **Ambroscus Koth** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 1:39 pm

God damn, this really makes me wish someone wrote Malice a condemnation when we were occupying Osiris. Apparently it's easy in the heat of the moment!

by **Jean Pierre Trudeau** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 1:59 pm

Ambroscus Koth wrote:God damn, this really makes me wish someone wrote Malice a condemnation when we were occupying Osiris. Apparently it's easy in the heat of the moment!

Douria was condemned for it. Don't you remember?

by **Yuketobaniac** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 2:27 pm

Yuketobaniac does not support This condemnation of stujenske, we are against this vote.

by **Consular** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:57 pm

This whole condemnation seems like a knee-jerk reaction to me, born out of frustration that the PRL lost Lazarus.

But sure. Go ahead and give them a badge of recognition.

Stu's just a puppet. Krulltopia, AMOM, NPO leaders, are actually commended by this Security Council, interestingly enough. :S

by **Jean Pierre Trudeau** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 7:21 pm

Consular wrote:Stu's just a puppet. Krulltopia, AMOM, NPO leaders, are actually commended by this Security Council, interestingly enough. :S

Not for long.

by **The Imperial Papal States** » Wed Apr 15, 2015 3:57 pm

good job Stujenske :clap:

The entire WA is corrupt, and i request that it be immediately disbanded, and that it's leader be detained.

I classify it as a threat to international security and national sovereignty.

I applaud Stupenske's actions, and offer support.

by **Canuckatook** » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:09 pm

The Dominion of Canuckatook is shocked and appalled by the unprovoked, vicious, and barbaric overthrow of a peaceful government and unequivocally condemns Stujenske.

As the Dominion of Canuckatook is just about as important as the Realm of Kiwis, we sincerely doubt anyone will read and or give two hoots about this dispatch.

- Prime Minister of Canuckatook, Just In Troo Doe
Premier Ministre du Canuckatook, Just In Troo Doe

by **Drewlantis** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:35 am

OOC: Finally I'm back, way too many missions..
IC "This is a horrible way to attempt to punish Stu, it's basically recognizing Stu for his nefarious deeds, which he wants, and it praises the PRL, when the PRL was similar and tore itself apart."

by **Europe and Northern Asia** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:15 pm

Is it just to condemn a country for merely exercising their capabilities? Especially when they were voted into their position. This matter is the fault of the ones who put him in charge. I see this condemnation as void.

by **Kasatourbous** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:52 pm

It seems to me that the accused took advantage of the victims and misused their power. They deserve this condemnation.

by **Drewlantis** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:09 pm

Kasatourbous wrote:It seems to me that the accused took advantage of the victims and misused their power. They deserve this condemnation.

Except they want to be condemned, we'd just be giving them what they want.

by **Kasatourbous** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:44 pm

Drewlantis wrote:
Kasatourbous wrote:It seems to me that the accused took advantage of the victims and misused their power. They deserve this condemnation.

Except they want to be condemned, we'd just be giving them what they want.

But by not condemning them, this gives them more power to keep repeating their act.

by **Coupy** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:23 pm

Condemn Stujenske was passed 12,643 votes to 1,344.

by **Religionous** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:58 am

Coupy wrote:Condemn Stujenske was passed 12,643 votes to 1,344.

If I'm not mistaken, that would be the highest margin ever for an SC proposal.

by **Zaolat** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:15 am

Jean Pierre Trudeau wrote:
Ambroscus Koth wrote:God damn, this really makes me wish someone wrote Malice a condemnation when we were occupying Osiris. Apparently it's easy in the heat of the moment!

Douria was condemned for it. Don't you remember?

That had nothing to do with Malice.

[PASSED] Condemn Stujenske

The Corrupt WA

Shock and appalled

Is this just?

Who is online