by Hvalfyurden » Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:52 pm
by Yevakovia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 4:32 am
Hvalfyurden wrote:I hereby wish to instate a vote to condemn United Klotecnia for the following:
-Leading three regional wars in the USSR (invalid evidence)
-Godmoding his fascist rebellions into other nations of the region
-Stating he is a far right ultranationalist in a communist region
-Trolling
-When asked to leave the region, he refused (
-Calls the region unwanted titles (in response to Conslavia's calling of Klotecnia, 'treacherous dogs')
-Claims that the USSR nations that ask Klotecnia to leave's in-real-life nations are the reason he sees his "home" country as corrupt (The previous Thai governments are corrupt due to the United States specifically)
-Is godmoding unrestricted nuclear arms on three other nations in the region (when Klotecnia was hit by Bratislavskayan weapons)
-Disagrees with everything the region (the USSR) stands for, but refuses to leave or stay quiet (this is a sign of un-democracy)
Proof of this all can be found upon the USSR message board. Myself and several other nations of the USSR move to condemn the nation United Klotecnia for its crimes, and we also move to have itself, and it's puppet nations removed from the USSR permanently. and prevent them from ever being able to post upon our message board.
Edit: Klotecnia has left the USSR, however, we still move to condemn his actions.
by Crazy girl » Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:25 am
by Valaran » Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:10 am
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by New Carloso » Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:12 am
Valaran wrote:I would very much like to know what an obstain is. This is the real issue here.
Can we hunt it? Could it be herded into national reserves? Can we ride it into battle?
by Hvalfyurden » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:58 am
Yevakovia wrote:This poll is bias.
by Redsward » Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:28 pm
by Hvalfyurden » Sun Jan 18, 2015 1:25 pm
Redsward wrote:Don't condemn godmodders and trolls for what they do. Site rule violations should be reported, not used for condemnations.
by Redsward » Sun Jan 18, 2015 2:01 pm
Ardchoille wrote:2. Proposals must contain a unique and relevant argument.
That means:
...
(c) Don't use proposals to raise issues that should be dealt with elsewhere, such as rules violations and technical suggestions.
...
4. Your proposal must read as representing the opinion of the World Assembly, and as targeting a Nation or Region.
This means:
(a) You cannot reference the "real world" outside of NationStates.
by Redsward » Sun Jan 18, 2015 2:48 pm
by The Sednarik Administration » Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:54 pm
by United Klotecnia » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:11 pm
The Sednarik Administration wrote:Hvalfyurden wrote:How is this poll bias, do you even understand what the word "bias" means?
I know what the definition of 'bias' is, what I meant was.
1 [ mass noun ] inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair: there was evidence of bias against black applicants | the bias towards younger people in recruitment.
• a concentration on or interest in one particular area or subject: his work showed a discernible bias towards philosophy.
• a systematic distortion of a statistical result due to a factor not allowed for in its derivation.
United Klotecnia
by Hvalfyurden » Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:04 pm
United Klotecnia wrote:The Sednarik Administration wrote:
I know what the definition of 'bias' is, what I meant was.
1 [ mass noun ] inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair: there was evidence of bias against black applicants | the bias towards younger people in recruitment.
• a concentration on or interest in one particular area or subject: his work showed a discernible bias towards philosophy.
• a systematic distortion of a statistical result due to a factor not allowed for in its derivation.
United Klotecnia
The underlined statement above are correct in this case.
by Redsward » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:29 pm
Hvalfyurden wrote:Also, in what way have I referenced real nations? I was stating that Klotecnia himself was using real life nations upon us. I violated no rules.
Hvalfyurden wrote:-Claims that the USSR nations that ask Klotecnia to leave's in-real-life nations are the reason he sees his "home" country as corrupt
by Terricon » Tue May 05, 2015 2:36 pm
The Sednarik Administration wrote:Hvalfyurden wrote:How is this poll bias, do you even understand what the word "bias" means?
I know what the definition of 'bias' is, what I meant was.
1 [ mass noun ] inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair: there was evidence of bias against black applicants | the bias towards younger people in recruitment.
• a concentration on or interest in one particular area or subject: his work showed a discernible bias towards philosophy.
• a systematic distortion of a statistical result due to a factor not allowed for in its derivation.
Klotecnia
Yevakovia wrote:This poll is bias.
by Kaboomlandia » Tue May 05, 2015 5:24 pm
by Crazy girl » Tue May 05, 2015 10:33 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement