New Brussels wrote:Yeah, I was thinking about that...
Why would you include one of Sicarius' top-ranked officials as a co-author for a liberation targeted at Sicarius' raid?
Well arent you smart!
Advertisement
by Titan Royal » Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:51 pm
New Brussels wrote:Yeah, I was thinking about that...
Why would you include one of Sicarius' top-ranked officials as a co-author for a liberation targeted at Sicarius' raid?
by Islamic Republic e Jariri » Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:52 pm
New Brussels wrote:Yeah, I was thinking about that...
Why would you include one of Sicarius' top-ranked officials as a co-author for a liberation targeted at Sicarius' raid?
by United Western States of America » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:01 pm
Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:New Brussels wrote:Yeah, I was thinking about that...
Why would you include one of Sicarius' top-ranked officials as a co-author for a liberation targeted at Sicarius' raid?
He did correct the date at which the invasion took place as well as supplying as list of the regions who helped Sicarius invade the region, therefore contributing additional content into the proposal.
National Information
Coming soon
by The Stalker » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:35 pm
Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:New Brussels wrote:Yeah, I was thinking about that...
Why would you include one of Sicarius' top-ranked officials as a co-author for a liberation targeted at Sicarius' raid?
He did correct the date at which the invasion took place as well as supplying as list of the regions who helped Sicarius invade the region, therefore contributing additional content into the proposal.
by Valrifell » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:37 pm
United Western States of America wrote:Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:
He did correct the date at which the invasion took place as well as supplying as list of the regions who helped Sicarius invade the region, therefore contributing additional content into the proposal.
Yes, he did contribute helpful information, did he not? Credit goes where credit is due, regardless of how...uncomfortable...the arrangement is.
EDIT: I am darn well aware that Ever-Wandering Souls was a raider, and I was long before the resolution was submitted. Lets not be going around insulting people's IQ.
by Islamic Republic e Jariri » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:38 pm
The Stalker wrote:Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:
He did correct the date at which the invasion took place as well as supplying as list of the regions who helped Sicarius invade the region, therefore contributing additional content into the proposal.
lol because he wanted further publicity by having all the regions mentioned in the resolution. The resolution could have been passed without it, and giving the raiders a co-authorship for it is absurd.
Regardless, I approved the resolution cause it's needed.
by Asking Alexandria » Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:19 pm
Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:The Stalker wrote:
lol because he wanted further publicity by having all the regions mentioned in the resolution. The resolution could have been passed without it, and giving the raiders a co-authorship for it is absurd.
Regardless, I approved the resolution cause it's needed.
It is needed, I hope no one mistakes otherwise
Our natives have lost their government and many have been banjected, others under the threat of banjection if they disagree with the raiders too much and our previous organized government has been forced out against the will of the people. The natives are not happy and must be helped.
by Ramaeus » Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:35 pm
by Islamic Republic e Jariri » Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:42 pm
Ramaeus wrote:A poorly written draft, one which has the current, publicly listed point of the raid in question listed as a Co-author?
Against.
I may be able to support a Liberation of Islam if the circumstances were not unusual.
by Topid » Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:49 pm
by Islamic Republic e Jariri » Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:54 pm
by Chester Pearson » Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:56 pm
Topid wrote:I'm reasonably certain that listing co-authors that did not make significant contributions to the proposal is not legal. I seem to recall this being an issue before, though my memory of SC rulings does tend to be a couple years out of date.
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Islamic Republic e Jariri » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:17 pm
by New Brussels » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:39 pm
Chester Pearson wrote:Topid wrote:I'm reasonably certain that listing co-authors that did not make significant contributions to the proposal is not legal. I seem to recall this being an issue before, though my memory of SC rulings does tend to be a couple years out of date.
Hey... Tim was a co-author of a two-liner so....
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:58 pm
Topid wrote:I'm reasonably certain that listing co-authors that did not make significant contributions to the proposal is not legal. I seem to recall this being an issue before, though my memory of SC rulings does tend to be a couple years out of date.
EDIT: viewtopic.php?p=3755848#co-authors
And, this seems most relevant: viewtopic.php?p=10172451#p10172451
I have filed a GHR to have the proposal removed from the floor.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Topid » Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:09 am
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Topid wrote:I'm reasonably certain that listing co-authors that did not make significant contributions to the proposal is not legal. I seem to recall this being an issue before, though my memory of SC rulings does tend to be a couple years out of date.
EDIT: viewtopic.php?p=3755848#co-authors
And, this seems most relevant: viewtopic.php?p=10172451#p10172451
I have filed a GHR to have the proposal removed from the floor.
By my count of characters excluding spaces of the pure proposal text, I am personally responsible for about 1/3 of the text of the proposal.
by Islamic Republic e Jariri » Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:12 am
by Sedgistan » Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:20 am
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Breaking any rules with your wording? Are terms like raider region and re-found allowed?
Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:New Brussels wrote:Yeah, I was thinking about that...
Why would you include one of Sicarius' top-ranked officials as a co-author for a liberation targeted at Sicarius' raid?
He did correct the date at which the invasion took place as well as supplying as list of the regions who helped Sicarius invade the region, therefore contributing additional content into the proposal.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:30 am
Sedgistan wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Breaking any rules with your wording? Are terms like raider region and re-found allowed?
Yes, they are allowed.Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:
He did correct the date at which the invasion took place as well as supplying as list of the regions who helped Sicarius invade the region, therefore contributing additional content into the proposal.
Co-authors are supposed to be those that contribute significantly towards the proposal; an amount roughly on-par with the author's. That's a guideline, not a rule, but something to bear in mind.
In particular, any listed co-author can request that the moderators remove the proposal at any point before it comes to vote.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Redsward » Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:13 am
Ramaeus wrote:Congratulations on attaining quorum. The vote will be interesting to observe.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:26 pm
Ramaeus wrote:Congratulations on attaining quorum. The vote will be interesting to observe.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by The Isles of Random » Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:32 pm
The Gentle Breeze of Westerly Winds
52 minutes ago
We're just playing possum right now
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by The Isles of Random » Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:33 pm
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ashlinla
Advertisement