Why did somebody condemn a moderator?
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:27 amWas condemning a moderator even legal in this game because I thought they were powerful and also one was condemned 
NationStates
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Why did somebody condemn a moderator?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:27 amPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:29 amIt's legal as long as you aren't condemning them for anything related to moderation. As players, you are welcome to condemn them for their actions relating to the game.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:31 amNot knowing the circumstances...
Moderators can and do participate in role-playing and other non-moderator functions. As friendly as they can be in person, their in-character (IC) actions can be evil and corrupt. Thus it is possible for a moderator to be condemned by the World Assembly.
Moderators can and do participate in role-playing and other non-moderator functions. As friendly as they can be in person, their in-character (IC) actions can be evil and corrupt. Thus it is possible for a moderator to be condemned by the World Assembly.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:34 amThe Great Zedong Dynasty wrote:Was condemning a moderator even legal in this game because I thought they were powerful and also one was condemned
If you're referring to Mallorea and Riva, it was condemned for being part of one of the bigger Raider regions on NS (though I think more people voted yay on the condemnation proposal due to a pretty fair amount of moderator corruption he had previously exhibited)
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:38 amSerrian wrote:The Great Zedong Dynasty wrote:Was condemning a moderator even legal in this game because I thought they were powerful and also one was condemned
If you're referring to Mallorea and Riva, it was condemned for being part of one of the bigger Raider regions on NS (though I think more people voted yay on the condemnation proposal due to a pretty fair amount of moderator corruption he had previously exhibited)
Considering (1) he has not engaged in moderator corruption and (2) he was condemned before being modded, your argument makes no sense.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:57 amKringalia wrote:Serrian wrote:
If you're referring to Mallorea and Riva, it was condemned for being part of one of the bigger Raider regions on NS (though I think more people voted yay on the condemnation proposal due to a pretty fair amount of moderator corruption he had previously exhibited)
Considering (1) he has not engaged in moderator corruption and (2) he was condemned before being modded, your argument makes no sense.
I wasn't around at the time and really haven't examined the whole subject very deeply, so I think we can excuse small factual errors.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:00 amSerrian
A word of advice, When something is factually incorrect, or you don't know if it's true or not, you shouldn't say it. Those with less knowledge will take it as the truth. And done enough times, can lead to you reputation being damaged.
-Benjamin Henrikson
A word of advice, When something is factually incorrect, or you don't know if it's true or not, you shouldn't say it. Those with less knowledge will take it as the truth. And done enough times, can lead to you reputation being damaged.
-Benjamin Henrikson
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:27 amPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:21 pmHeh.
I imagine that, like myself, he sought out condemnation.
I imagine that, like myself, he sought out condemnation.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:02 pmSerrian wrote:The Great Zedong Dynasty wrote:Was condemning a moderator even legal in this game because I thought they were powerful and also one was condemned
If you're referring to Mallorea and Riva, it was condemned for being part of one of the bigger Raider regions on NS (though I think more people voted yay on the condemnation proposal due to a pretty fair amount of moderator corruption he had previously exhibited)
Mall was condemned before he became a mod, silly.
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:19 pmIsnt this a "Pointlessly spammy topic" since the condemnation states why the person was condemned?
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:21 pm
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:05 amExcuse "small" (if "complete" can now mean "small") factual errors, when they formed the basis of the core of your post?!