[IDEA] Condemn The Pacific

[Luxembourgers]

I had heard the TP was very conservative, but I never realized how much so until my newest nation was founded there. Anyone is free to use this idea, but please just give my main nation Schiltzberg credit at the bottom of the proposal. Some reasons for condemnation are:

Founder bans all nations with over 10 endorsements
Unlike all other "feeder" regions, they have refused to establish a democratic form of government that is open to the ideas and opinions of all member nations,
They are very unwilling to help new nations
The self-appointed government has refused to choose a new delegate for over five years
Judging by the World Factbook Entry, the delegate wants nothing to do with the regions citizens

[Tano]

I agree. The Pacific wasn't simply meant to be a dictatorship after all

Also, <sarcasm> in case you couldn't tell. This will never happen.

[Chester Pearson]

And what exactly is the plan here? To shame Krull into turning the region into a democracy?

[Faschist Deutsch Reich]

I very much hate the Pacific and its leadership, but they are in no way worth condemning. Good luck with your idea... It won't get far though.

[Luxembourgers]

It is just an idea. Anyone who wants to use it can if they give credit. I have no intention of personally pursuing this because I realize how incredibly hard it would be to condemn any region as big as TP, but please, if you wish to pursue this, send me a TG and I will help you out.

[Karpathos]

I always found it amusing how non-Pacifican nations always seem to know what's best for Pacifica.

[Hallowell]

I very much hate the Pacific and its leadership, but they are in no way worth condemning. Good luck with your idea... It won't get far though.

I feel exactly the same way. I despise the dictatorship there, but the condemnation will not go anywhere.

[Takane]

I very much hate the Pacific and its leadership, but they are in no way worth condemning. Good luck with your idea... It won't get far though.

I feel exactly the same way. I despise the dictatorship there, but the condemnation will not go anywhere.

And what's wrong with dictatorship? They have a system that has worked well for years. Arguably one of the oldest continuous regional governments in history. Their rules aren't hard to follow (you don't even need beyond two endorsements anyways), and I've found them to be nice people willing to help you out.

[Karpathos]

Right you are. The NPO is more than accommodating.

[The Leningrad Union]

Why does everyone care so much about democracy in NS regions? It's not always the best system and the NPO is amazing.

[United States of Natan]

tried it a while ago. failed. its not worth the effort. If you want to get rid of him so badly, I suggest a coup d' etat.

[The Leningrad Union]

tried it a while ago. failed. its not worth the effort. If you want to get rid of him so badly, I suggest a coup d' etat.

That would be impossible.

[Tano]

tried it a while ago. failed. its not worth the effort. If you want to get rid of him so badly, I suggest a coup d' etat.

I would wish you good luck, but frankly all the luck in the world isn't gonna get you TP.
\

[United States of Natan]

tried it a while ago. failed. its not worth the effort. If you want to get rid of him so badly, I suggest a coup d' etat.

That would be impossible.

I suggested he attempt one. I never said he'd succeed.

tried it a while ago. failed. its not worth the effort. If you want to get rid of him so badly, I suggest a coup d' etat.

I would wish you good luck, but frankly all the luck in the world isn't gonna get you TP.
\

all the luck in the universe won't even get him in the region.

[Nordenwald]

You try a Condemning Krulltopia instead of Condemning the Pacific. To me it seems like your problem is with Krull, not the Pacific itself.

[Feux]

You try a Condemning Krulltopia instead of Condemning the Pacific. To me it seems like your problem is with Krull, not the Pacific itself.

Krulltopia has been commended by the Security Council. Resolution #111 I believe.

[Karpathos]

That's because he, the Pacific, and the NPO are commendable.

[Nordenwald]

You try a Condemning Krulltopia instead of Condemning the Pacific. To me it seems like your problem is with Krull, not the Pacific itself.

Krulltopia has been commended by the Security Council. Resolution #111 I believe.

I feel like Krulltopia would be deserving of both a commend and a condemn.

[The Serbian Empire]

Krulltopia has been commended by the Security Council. Resolution #111 I believe.

I feel like Krulltopia would be deserving of both a commend and a condemn.

I think it would be easier to repeal the commendation than to condemn given the lack of democracy and draconian rule.

[Tano]

I feel like Krulltopia would be deserving of both a commend and a condemn.

I think it would be easier to repeal the commendation than to condemn given the lack of democracy and draconian rule.

And lack of democracy is a bad thing because...?

[Feux]

I feel like Krulltopia would be deserving of both a commend and a condemn.

I think it would be easier to repeal the commendation than to condemn given the lack of democracy and draconian rule.

I will fight them tooth and nail to the death.

[Ramaeus]

I think it would be easier to repeal the commendation than to condemn given the lack of democracy and draconian rule.

You won't be able to repeal Krull's Commendation. You'd face severe opposition from regions with very high endorsement counts, including TEP. Also, it would be best if you didn't comment on matters you know nothing of.

[The United States of Scotland]

I Agree. From what I saw,they should be condemned.

[Padnak]

I don't think this is going to fly

[Sunarctica]

We fully support you