NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Commend Christian Democrats

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Eist
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: May 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Eist » Tue Jul 08, 2014 12:49 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:You must forgive us; we vastly overestimated the ability of this body to tolerate differing points of view. Apparently the SC is no better than the GA in that regard. We will not be making the same mistake again, we assure you.


Thanks Kenny. If I understand your thinking correctly, we should be supporting commendations for players like CD not because they are actually commendable, but because we do not agree with their extreme, arguably disgusting, and very vocal personal views and actions. Furthermore, if we don't subscribe to your idea here then apparently we are everything that is wrong with the SC so much so that it's basically the same as the GA, which you seem to see in a very negative light. Got it?
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.

User avatar
PrussianEmpire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 907
Founded: Dec 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby PrussianEmpire » Tue Jul 08, 2014 7:52 pm

Nierr wrote:
AWARE of 'Right to Life', a region created and maintained by Christian Democrats in an effort to tendentiously promote the Pro-Life side of the extremely controversial topic of abortion,
Founding a region to promote a hateful ideology isn't something commendable. Unless you're going to be commending LCG next?

Just going to throw this in here. Just because some one wants to prevent the murder of a human does not mean they hate women, it just means they wish to keep a human alive. Obviously there will be times when an abortion is acceptable (rape, major birth defects, threat to women's life, etc.) but I do not see how it is comparable to Nazi ideology. Do you mind explaining how they are?
—« The PrussianEmpire From The East Pacific »—

The contents of the above post represent the views of Exshaw, the Imperial Legion, the United Defenders League, the Founderless Regions Alliance, the New Inquisition, the Black Hawks, the North Pacific, the Alliance Defense Network, the Atlantic Central Command, Francos Spain, Dwight Eisenhower, and the 1998 New York Yankees.

User avatar
Mundiferrum
Diplomat
 
Posts: 830
Founded: Apr 07, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Mundiferrum » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:30 am

Eist wrote:
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:You must forgive us; we vastly overestimated the ability of this body to tolerate differing points of view. Apparently the SC is no better than the GA in that regard. We will not be making the same mistake again, we assure you.


Thanks Kenny. If I understand your thinking correctly, we should be supporting commendations for players like CD not because they are actually commendable, but because we do not agree with their extreme, arguably disgusting, and very vocal personal views and actions. Furthermore, if we don't subscribe to your idea here then apparently we are everything that is wrong with the SC so much so that it's basically the same as the GA, which you seem to see in a very negative light. Got it?


The definition of "Extreme" being terribly subjective. Just coz' he's anti-(some cases of)abortion, a point which often divides this assembly into clean halves (ie, a point not considered bad across the majority of the board), does not mean he's believing in something even arguably 'disgusting'. Plus, that's literally only one, relatively minor side of the grand polygon that is what he's done in this assembly. You can't honestly say that having passed nine really sensible resolutions, including Forced Marriages Ban Act and Stopping Suicide Seeds, plus working to improve the regions Balder and The Rejected Realms, which are currently two major feeder regions, is not commendable.
MARCVSGRAVELLIVSCISTERNAEMAGNORATOR-ORATORMVNDIFERRIADCONCILIVMMNDVM
Marcus Gravellius Cisternae Magnorator, Mundiferri Representative to the World Assembly
"Call me Gravey. Only my really close friends call me Marcus, and I don't think we're that close yet. Maybe."
No, we are not a nation of cat people. We're all humans (and a few annoying gnomes) here. The cat's just there because our king is such a genius, he saw that it would be a good military strategy to have a distractingly cute flag, to blind our enemies to (our) victory!
Technological level: FUTURE TECH. We also have MAGICAL TECH, and a lot of the people here still play with MEDIEVAL TECH and PRESENT TECH. We're cool that way.

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:15 am

Eist wrote:
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:You must forgive us; we vastly overestimated the ability of this body to tolerate differing points of view. Apparently the SC is no better than the GA in that regard. We will not be making the same mistake again, we assure you.


Thanks Kenny. If I understand your thinking correctly, we should be supporting commendations for players like CD not because they are actually commendable, but because we do not agree with their extreme, arguably disgusting, and very vocal personal views and actions. Furthermore, if we don't subscribe to your idea here then apparently we are everything that is wrong with the SC so much so that it's basically the same as the GA, which you seem to see in a very negative light. Got it?

No, if you don't subscribe to an idea because of ideological prejudice...then you are everything that's wrong with the WA (nevermind just the SC). And you're really not helping your case when you describe someone's views as "extreme" and "disgusting" just because you don't agree with them.
Last edited by Omigodtheykilledkenny on Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Tim-Opolis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6197
Founded: Feb 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tim-Opolis » Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:31 pm

Opposed and will actively campaign against due to things such as the Anti-Choice clause and other various. Scientific States and Nierr seem to sum up my opinion quite aptly.
Want to be a hero? Join The Grey Wardens - Help Us Save Nationstates
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Commended by Security Council Resolution #420 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Author of SC#74, SC #203, SC #222, and SC #238 | Co-Author of SC#191
Founder of Spiritus | Three-Time Delegate of Osiris | Pharaoh of the Islamic Republics of Iran | Hero of Greece
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

User avatar
District XIV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5990
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby District XIV » Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:40 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:Opposed and will actively campaign against due to things such as the Anti-Choice clause and other various. Scientific States and Nierr seem to sum up my opinion quite aptly.

I'm Pro-Choice, but the only reason that I'm still holding onto this is because CD says he's ok with abortion in some cases.

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:09 pm

The ambassador points out that the act of creating a region is not worthy of a commendation, especially if that region is based on an ideology that is anti-women. We will instruct our counterpart in Uchila Eru to OPPOSE this motion.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Drop Your Pants
Senator
 
Posts: 3860
Founded: Apr 17, 2005
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Drop Your Pants » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:56 pm

Eist wrote:I think CD is the most detestable player in NationStates. I will dig up some of our old conversations later if it looks like it has any chance of passing, which I sincerely hope it does not. In the indelible words of CD: AGAINST

Share with the group :P
Happily oblivious to NS Drama and I rarely pay attention beyond 5 minutes

User avatar
PrussianEmpire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 907
Founded: Dec 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby PrussianEmpire » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:48 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:The ambassador points out that the act of creating a region is not worthy of a commendation, especially if that region is based on an ideology that is anti-women. We will instruct our counterpart in Uchila Eru to OPPOSE this motion.

It's not anti-women...it's anti-murder...
—« The PrussianEmpire From The East Pacific »—

The contents of the above post represent the views of Exshaw, the Imperial Legion, the United Defenders League, the Founderless Regions Alliance, the New Inquisition, the Black Hawks, the North Pacific, the Alliance Defense Network, the Atlantic Central Command, Francos Spain, Dwight Eisenhower, and the 1998 New York Yankees.

User avatar
District XIV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5990
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby District XIV » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:53 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:The ambassador points out that the act of creating a region is not worthy of a commendation, especially if that region is based on an ideology that is anti-women. We will instruct our counterpart in Uchila Eru to OPPOSE this motion.

I said that the opinion that the regions promotes is controversial.
Last edited by District XIV on Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
District XIV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5990
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby District XIV » Wed Sep 17, 2014 6:48 pm

And after a little over two months, I'll be submitting this soon.
PrussianEmpire wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:The ambassador points out that the act of creating a region is not worthy of a commendation, especially if that region is based on an ideology that is anti-women. We will instruct our counterpart in Uchila Eru to OPPOSE this motion.

It's not anti-women...it's anti-murder...

Let's not venture into that realm here >_>
Last edited by District XIV on Wed Sep 17, 2014 6:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:05 pm

District XIV wrote:AWARE of 'Right to Life', a region created and maintained by Christian Democrats in an effort to tendentiously promote the Pro-Life side of the extremely controversial topic of abortion

Will never vote for something with a statement like this.

User avatar
District XIV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5990
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby District XIV » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:10 pm

Wrapper wrote:
District XIV wrote:AWARE of 'Right to Life', a region created and maintained by Christian Democrats in an effort to tendentiously promote the Pro-Life side of the extremely controversial topic of abortion

Will never vote for something with a statement like this.

In the way that you're against the "pro-life" movement or are "pro-life" and dislike the language used to convey such an activity?

I'm unsure :P

User avatar
Solorni
Minister
 
Posts: 3024
Founded: Sep 04, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Solorni » Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:25 pm

Finally something different than the usual fare lately. I'm unsure on this one in all honesty.
Lovely Queen of Balder
Proud Delegate of WALL

Lucky Number 13

User avatar
McMasterdonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 962
Founded: Apr 19, 2012
Mother Knows Best State

Postby McMasterdonia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:15 am

District XIV wrote:
Wrapper wrote:Will never vote for something with a statement like this.

In the way that you're against the "pro-life" movement or are "pro-life" and dislike the language used to convey such an activity?

I'm unsure :P


Personally, I dislike the choice of language. Abortion is obviously a controversial issue, and people will likely vote against if the proposal is seen to be commending him for promoting that topic. You could perhaps suggest that while the WA does not necessarily agree with said world-view, that the dedication & commitment to his views is commendable. Just a suggestion :hug:

I certainly do not agree with Christian Democrat's world view, but I would probably vote For this. Largely due to what Sanctaria outlined on Page 1.

User avatar
Hakio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1584
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakio » Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:48 am

"My constituents are basically split down the middle on this one," states Drock Greiger after a long day of debating. "About half of our Legionaries (the people who vote on the resolutions) are FOR and quite literally, exactly half are against. The contributions of Christian Democrats are respectable and most assuredly noteworthy, but the opposition to such a proposal rests on analysis of his conduct and some controversial political views. If it comes down to the wire I think I might support this."
Proud International Federalist

WA Voting History
Progressivism 97.5
Socialism 81.25
Tenderness 46.875
Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.28
#1
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.

User avatar
Evil Wolf
Minister
 
Posts: 2412
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Evil Wolf » Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:49 am

District XIV wrote:RECOGNIZES the inter-regional political participation of Christian Democrats, such as in The Rejected Realms and the Founderless Regions Alliance, in which they have served in high-ranking government positions,


I don't understand why his mere membership in these regions, regardless of position, is commendable. Plenty of people have served in plenty of regions in high ranking positions and almost none of them have commends. What specifically makes CD's participation in TRR and FRA so noteworthy that it: a.) earns him a Commendation b.) is worth noting on a commendation?
It's ok! You can trust me! I've been Commended!

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

Mallorea and Riva should be a Game Moderator Game Administrator.

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5744
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Fri Sep 19, 2014 11:55 am

Nation of Quebec wrote:The ambassador points out that the act of creating a region is not worthy of a commendation, especially if that region is based on an ideology that is anti-women. We will instruct our counterpart in Uchila Eru to OPPOSE this motion.

It's wonderful to know that people are only worthy of commendation in the Security Council if their ideology is sufficiently politically correct. We'll make note of that the next time someone tries to commend AO.

Oh, wait. What was that? They already commended AO, a highly conservative, NatSov region? Oh, well, standards must have changed since then...
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Confused People
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Confused People » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:59 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:The ambassador points out that the act of creating a region is not worthy of a commendation, especially if that region is based on an ideology that is anti-women. We will instruct our counterpart in Uchila Eru to OPPOSE this motion.

It's wonderful to know that people are only worthy of commendation in the Security Council if their ideology is sufficiently politically correct.

I don't think it's a question of being politically correct. It's more like people who disagree with the ideology will, unsurprisingly, disagree it's a reason for commendation.
...isn't commending based on a ideology a problem in itself?

User avatar
The Leningrad Union
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 471
Founded: Apr 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Leningrad Union » Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:36 am

I don't think the pro life should be mentioned. It makes this more political than it has to be.
I founded Madrigal and Confederacy of Allied States. However, I have given up my power in both. I reside in Iraq currently. Come join me!

Parody of typical NSG sig:

NSG's resident Liberal Gay Atheist because there's totally no other liberals, gays or atheists here!
Impeach GP, Legalize RP, NSG 2016!
Mallorea and Riva should resign
*Insert some uneducated statement about how I support a stupid ideology that I heard about in my middle school social studies class*
*Insert some typical liberal and/or edgy statement about Gaza and/or Ukraine*

some popular TETer wrote:Leningrad iz kewl

some dude that agreed with me on a debate wrote:Just listen to Leningrad!

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:57 am

While I agree that CD's contributions to the WA should be recognized, I cannot support this resolution as it currently stands.

The act of creating a region is not something that should be commended, especially if that region is dedicated to advocating a highly controversial political viewpoint.

The act of being a member of governments is also not really something that should be commended.

So as this resolution currently stands, I will instruct my WA puppet state to oppose this resolution.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
District XIV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5990
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby District XIV » Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:59 am

Nation of Quebec wrote:The act of creating a region is not something that should be commended, especially if that region is dedicated to advocating a highly controversial political viewpoint.

That's not a reason for this commendation though...

Why would a Pro-Choicer like myself commend a Pro-Lifer for doing Pro-Life things?

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:10 am

District XIV wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:The act of creating a region is not something that should be commended, especially if that region is dedicated to advocating a highly controversial political viewpoint.

That's not a reason for this commendation though...

Why would a Pro-Choicer like myself commend a Pro-Lifer for doing Pro-Life things?


I'm about as pro-choice as you can get and if someone created a pro-choice region I wouldn't commend them for it. I suspect many people who are pro-choice won't support this resolution just by the mere mention of the "Right to Life" region. It's a highly controversial region and it's the main reason why I refuse to support this resolution.

If the resolution was only for the WA resolutions CD wrote, then I would be more likely to support it, but I have issues with the clauses that aren't really worthy of being commended such as being the WA delegate for Catholic, for example.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Dark Fire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Dec 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Dark Fire » Sun Sep 21, 2014 3:21 am

AWARE of 'Right to Life', a region created and maintained by Christian Democrats in an effort to tendentiously promote the Pro-Life side of the extremely controversial topic of abortion,

BELIEVES, despite controversial actions, Christian Democrats is still worthy of a commendation for their commitment to regional growth, inter-regional security, and notable World Assembly authorship,


That does not sound like "we commend because" to me, it sounds like "we commend despite".

User avatar
District XIV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5990
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby District XIV » Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:17 pm

Dark Fire wrote:
AWARE of 'Right to Life', a region created and maintained by Christian Democrats in an effort to tendentiously promote the Pro-Life side of the extremely controversial topic of abortion,

BELIEVES, despite controversial actions, Christian Democrats is still worthy of a commendation for their commitment to regional growth, inter-regional security, and notable World Assembly authorship,


That does not sound like "we commend because" to me, it sounds like "we commend despite".

Exactly.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads