NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Commend Shadow Afforess

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Indian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Democratic Socialists

[DRAFT] Commend Shadow Afforess

Postby Indian Empire » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:34 am

NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013.

KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].

REMEMBERING: That Afforess had a delegate run in Capitalist Paradise for 8 Months in 2010.

STATING: That Afforess still runs NS++, one of the most popular Browser Exstensions.

SEEING: That Afforess has had exceptional contributions to, NSWiki, after the original one got shut down.

ALSO NOTING: Afforess has made many contributions to Capitalist Paradise.

HEREBY Commends [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].

Can I have some help fixing this up? I know that there is a few rule violations in this. Maybe we can work it out and fix it though.

User avatar
Port blood
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1946
Founded: Jan 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Port blood » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:48 am

Wasn't Afforess on both sides of C/C? as in considered both evil and good? (or was that someone else?)
No,I don't speak for TBR,TBH,your mom,moderation or any other person/organization,just saying before anyone thinks that
Sedgistan wrote:Discussion of UDL shirts belongs in the UDL thread.



Kelvaros Prime wrote:*Introduces head to wall repeatedly*
People are learning,join the revolution!

http://pastebin.com/JG8S5Txd

User avatar
Hayabusa
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1952
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hayabusa » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:51 am

I believe you need to tag Capitalist Paradise only once for it to be legal.
The Great Kingdom of Hayabusa
♛♛♛ FOUNDER OF THE COALITION OF MONARCHIES! ♛♛♛
Proud Member of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION!
Male, 15, In a relationship, Latino, Hobbies include soccer, NS, paintball, and Halo Reach. My Xbox GT is SL Royal if anyone wants to play.
Yes, I am PROUDLY A MONARCHIST!
The New American commonwealth wrote:NYET!
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) #ILiekEggs ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

User avatar
Indian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Indian Empire » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:52 am

Hayabusa wrote:I believe you need to tag Capitalist Paradise only once for it to be legal.


Okay.
Internet Explorer, IE, "Preacher of Defender Ideals"

User avatar
Feux
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1594
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:16 am

Hayabusa wrote:I believe you need to tag Capitalist Paradise only once for it to be legal.

I don't believe that is true, but it looks nice when it comes to format.
Always Changing Shapes
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.

User avatar
Feux
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1594
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:18 am

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=256451&hilit=Commend+Afforess

You are welcome to review my withdrawn draft for any help if you would like. Regardless of Afforess' actions that have reflected negatively on the game play community, I still believe you will find plenty of support for a proposal to commend him.
Last edited by Feux on Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Always Changing Shapes
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.

User avatar
Shadow Afforess
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1270
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shadow Afforess » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:00 pm

Port blood wrote:Wasn't Afforess on both sides of C/C? as in considered both evil and good? (or was that someone else?)


I'm an uncommendable and uncondemable nation. Either proposal is doomed to fail. Such is the price of being Chaotic Neutral.
Last edited by Shadow Afforess on Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

User avatar
Feux
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1594
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:17 pm

Shadow Afforess wrote:
Port blood wrote:Wasn't Afforess on both sides of C/C? as in considered both evil and good? (or was that someone else?)


I'm an uncommendable and uncondemable nation. Either proposal is doomed to fail. Such is the price of being Chaotic Neutral.

I don't think it is doomed to fail, just unlikely to pass either way. :P
Always Changing Shapes
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.

User avatar
Terravoss
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 167
Founded: Mar 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terravoss » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:19 pm

NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013.

KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].


These clauses would be considered metagaming.
WARNING, WARNING, WARNING

This is an out of character nation that represents my true views on Nation States. I make no apologies for any comment that I may make. You have been warned.

User avatar
Feux
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1594
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:24 pm

Terravoss wrote:
NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013.

KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].


These clauses would be considered metagaming.

He is right, but there is a way you can word it to still include that information within the proposal.
Always Changing Shapes
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.

User avatar
Port blood
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1946
Founded: Jan 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Port blood » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:34 pm

Shadow Afforess wrote:
Port blood wrote:Wasn't Afforess on both sides of C/C? as in considered both evil and good? (or was that someone else?)


I'm an uncommendable and uncondemable nation. Either proposal is doomed to fail. Such is the price of being Chaotic Neutral.


Yeah,that was what i was thinking

STATING: That Afforess still runs NS++, one of the most popular Browser Exstensions.

SEEING: That Afforess has had exceptional contributions to, NSWiki, after the original one got shut down.


this is also metagaming btw,and NSWiki is off-site so i think thats also illegal
No,I don't speak for TBR,TBH,your mom,moderation or any other person/organization,just saying before anyone thinks that
Sedgistan wrote:Discussion of UDL shirts belongs in the UDL thread.



Kelvaros Prime wrote:*Introduces head to wall repeatedly*
People are learning,join the revolution!

http://pastebin.com/JG8S5Txd

User avatar
Ramaeus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1024
Founded: Dec 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ramaeus » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:14 pm

Your proposal is supposed to be addressed to the SC, so start out with something like: "The Security Council,"

NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013. Ceased to exist would be legal term.

KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation]. Combine the noting and knowing clauses. Something like this, perhaps: Noting that the nation of Afforess ceased to exist on November 13, 2013, and aware that the former government of Afforess now controls the nation Shadow Afforess,

REMEMBERING: That Afforess had a delegate run in Capitalist Paradise for 8 Months in 2010. Okay, what did they do as delegate? Anything notable? Add that to your draft.

STATING: That Afforess still runs NS++, one of the most popular Browser Exstensions. Okay. Expand on this point. Describe some of the features of NS++, and describe them as if you're talking about them being added to a nation.

SEEING: That Afforess has had exceptional contributions to, NSWiki, after the original one got shut down. What contributions?

ALSO NOTING: Afforess has made many contributions to Capitalist Paradise. Like?

HEREBY Commends [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation]. Not yet.
Last edited by Ramaeus on Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Just some weeb.

User avatar
Eist
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: May 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Eist » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:35 pm

Not a snowball's chance in hell. AGAINST.
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.

User avatar
Shadow Afforess
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1270
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shadow Afforess » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:02 pm

Eist wrote:Not a snowball's chance in hell. AGAINST.


That is amusing to me, as I currently live in Michigan, and we do have a "Hell" that freezes over regularly.

Image
Last edited by Shadow Afforess on Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

User avatar
Indian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Indian Empire » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:21 am

Thank you for the help. I will consider all comments in there and re - edit this. Do not be alarmed if another nation of mine submits it, though.
Internet Explorer, IE, "Preacher of Defender Ideals"

User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:27 am

Hayabusa wrote:I believe you need to tag Capitalist Paradise only once for it to be legal.

Incorrect, but good advice nonetheless. Overuse of nation tags is an eyesore.

Terravoss wrote:
NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013.

KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].


These clauses would be considered metagaming.

Metagaming is not an SC rule. I see no rule violation here outside of the use of "deleted," which could be iffy. Just use "ceased to exist" instead. Furthermore, offsite activities are fine to mention. How else would we mention things that happen on forums?

Lack for information on the whole, however.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.

User avatar
Feuer Ritter
Diplomat
 
Posts: 729
Founded: Dec 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Feuer Ritter » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:57 am

Afforess deserves a commendation especially for his work on NS++, but not like this.....

User avatar
DWAsnia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 591
Founded: Dec 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby DWAsnia » Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:52 am

Attempting to commend Afforess so you can try to mend relations with CP? Against.
<Acario> it is Drasnia's job to shit in people's cheerios On a self-imposed forum hiatus.

User avatar
Sigaru
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Dec 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sigaru » Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:36 pm

Shadow Afforess wrote:
Eist wrote:Not a snowball's chance in hell. AGAINST.


That is amusing to me, as I currently live in Michigan, and we do have a "Hell" that freezes over regularly.

Image

Do you actually live there?

Ifso, *yay for another Michigander*:))

but I am against this because I am against the Wa.
Last edited by Sigaru on Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Improving Wordiness
Diplomat
 
Posts: 641
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Improving Wordiness » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:53 pm

DWAsnia wrote:Attempting to commend Afforess so you can try to mend relations with CP? Against.


Why would Indian Empire need to mend relations with CP? I think it needs to be made clear that the nation certainly does not represent the views of 10K if that is your line of thinking...unless the nation has reason to want to mend relations of some sort I am unaware of.
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I'm a massive tool. ;)

User avatar
Shadow Afforess
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1270
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shadow Afforess » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:22 pm

Improving Wordiness wrote:
DWAsnia wrote:Attempting to commend Afforess so you can try to mend relations with CP? Against.


Why would Indian Empire need to mend relations with CP? I think it needs to be made clear that the nation certainly does not represent the views of 10K if that is your line of thinking...unless the nation has reason to want to mend relations of some sort I am unaware of.


Indian Empire is a ban-on-sight nation in Capitalist Paradise, in part thanks to me. Him and several of his puppets are all banned.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

User avatar
Improving Wordiness
Diplomat
 
Posts: 641
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Improving Wordiness » Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:27 pm

I see...thanks for clarifying : )
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I'm a massive tool. ;)


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads