by Indian Empire » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:34 am
by Port blood » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:48 am
by Hayabusa » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:51 am
The New American commonwealth wrote:NYET!
by Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:16 am
Hayabusa wrote:I believe you need to tag Capitalist Paradise only once for it to be legal.
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:18 am
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Shadow Afforess » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:00 pm
Port blood wrote:Wasn't Afforess on both sides of C/C? as in considered both evil and good? (or was that someone else?)
by Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:17 pm
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Terravoss » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:19 pm
NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013.
KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].
by Feux » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:24 pm
Terravoss wrote:NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013.
KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].
These clauses would be considered metagaming.
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Port blood » Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:34 pm
STATING: That Afforess still runs NS++, one of the most popular Browser Exstensions.
SEEING: That Afforess has had exceptional contributions to, NSWiki, after the original one got shut down.
by Ramaeus » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:14 pm
Your proposal is supposed to be addressed to the SC, so start out with something like: "The Security Council,"
NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013. Ceased to exist would be legal term.
KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation]. Combine the noting and knowing clauses. Something like this, perhaps: Noting that the nation of Afforess ceased to exist on November 13, 2013, and aware that the former government of Afforess now controls the nation Shadow Afforess,
REMEMBERING: That Afforess had a delegate run in Capitalist Paradise for 8 Months in 2010. Okay, what did they do as delegate? Anything notable? Add that to your draft.
STATING: That Afforess still runs NS++, one of the most popular Browser Exstensions. Okay. Expand on this point. Describe some of the features of NS++, and describe them as if you're talking about them being added to a nation.
SEEING: That Afforess has had exceptional contributions to, NSWiki, after the original one got shut down. What contributions?
ALSO NOTING: Afforess has made many contributions to Capitalist Paradise. Like?
HEREBY Commends [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation]. Not yet.
by Shadow Afforess » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:02 pm
Eist wrote:Not a snowball's chance in hell. AGAINST.
by Indian Empire » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:21 am
by SkyDip » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:27 am
Hayabusa wrote:I believe you need to tag Capitalist Paradise only once for it to be legal.
Terravoss wrote:NOTING: The Original nation of Afforess was deleted on November 13, 2013.
KNOWING: That Afforess now controls [nation=short]Shadow Afforess[/nation].
These clauses would be considered metagaming.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Feuer Ritter » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:57 am
by Improving Wordiness » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:53 pm
DWAsnia wrote:Attempting to commend Afforess so you can try to mend relations with CP? Against.
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I'm a massive tool. ;)
by Shadow Afforess » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:22 pm
Improving Wordiness wrote:DWAsnia wrote:Attempting to commend Afforess so you can try to mend relations with CP? Against.
Why would Indian Empire need to mend relations with CP? I think it needs to be made clear that the nation certainly does not represent the views of 10K if that is your line of thinking...unless the nation has reason to want to mend relations of some sort I am unaware of.
by Improving Wordiness » Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:27 pm
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I'm a massive tool. ;)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement