Advertisement
by Aden Protectorate » Wed Feb 19, 2014 5:14 pm
by SkyDip » Wed Feb 19, 2014 5:25 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:03 pm
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: the_new_jewish_state_of_sivania_1393364078
Condemn The Black Riders
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Black Riders
Proposed by: The New Jewish State of Sivania
Description: People of the world. I request unto you a proposal. A proposal to once again condemn the Black Riders!
Just recently one of our comrade regions was taken by their land-hungry empire! Their regime is bent on war and only that! We must let them know that they must cease taking innocent regions that have not provoked them at all! They are a hostile entity that must be stopped!
So fellow nations, please if you consider approving of this proposal, just know that if you don't, then you could be next on the Black Rider's List!
Approvals: 4 (The New Jewish State of Sivania, Topsail Empire, Cognigotoapagawayiagan, Maoist People)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 74 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days 6 hours
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Port blood » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:26 am
by SkyDip » Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:16 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:27 pm
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: tylora_1393463807
Repeal "Condemn Macedon"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: SC#1
Proposed by: Tylora
Description: WA Security Council Resolution #1: Condemn Macedon shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument: The WA:
Realizing Macedon is no longer home to the imperialist nations it once was.
Noting that Macedon no longer spreads blue and orange text on the factbooks of its colonies.
Accepting that all of the reasons for condemning it no longer exist.
Hereby:
Repeals Condemn Macedon
Approvals: 10 (Communist Bloodia, Rachel Berry, Memoriabalia, ATC Nation, Russiaslavia, Eipa Negara, Zandalari, United Marxist Nations, The North American Unification of States, Vasputia)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 68 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 2 days 9 hours
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Eist » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:38 pm
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.
by Sedgistan » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:39 pm
by SkyDip » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:58 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Reference to WFEs are fine. I think the repeal does just enough in reference to the original resolution to be okay. Bear in mind that SC#1 doesn't really have much content anyway (and some of it is tricky to mention due to Rule 4), so repeals attempts are going to be limited in what they can refer to.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Indian Empire » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:29 pm
by SkyDip » Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:50 pm
Indian Empire wrote:Why was the resolution "Commend Anime Daisuki" Removed? I know that it was a rule violation, but i'm not sure what type.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Indian Empire » Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:00 pm
by SkyDip » Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:06 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:33 am
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: controlled_interests_1393719426
Condemn The Confederacy of Allied States
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Confederacy of Allied States
Proposed by: Controlled Interests
Description: The Security Council,
RECOGNIZING that the Confederacy of Allied States is a large region with supposedly democratic ideals.
FURTHER RECOGNIZING that as a region of this stature, the government of the Confederacy of Allied States should act with a certain set of expectations and decorum, and that the existing government not only ignored this set of operating principles, but acted in a manner that contradicted these expectations.
APPALLED by the fact that their founder, The Democratic Nation of Unovia, has exercised a coup of their long-serving delegate, Lemongrad Union (also known as Leningrad Union), ending a reign of over 160 days and tireless devotion to the well-being of the region and interrupting their democratic process.
FURTHER APPALLED that the manner in which the removal was carried out was callous, and that the key proponents of the coup were malicious in the manner with which they treated observers seeking answers regarding the situation.
OUTRAGED that the immediate cause of removal was the result of a 2-hour "poll" in which the founder nation himself voted yes immediately after the poll was called, and that these actions undermine the rights of the member nations of the CAS, who where unable to have a say in the workings of their government, as guaranteed by the laws set forth by the government itself.
FURTHER NOTING that the ejection was a preemptive political maneuver taken against Lemongrad to remove him from power, and that no formal consensus was established amongst the general constituents of the region regarding the removal of Lemongrad.
FURTHER ANGERED that no hard evidence was provided regarding Lemongrad's alleged wrongdoings, and that key individuals instrumental in the removal of Lemongrad refused to provide the evidence necessary, citing various non-substantive reasons for their failure to do so.
DISGUSTED that the only reasoning provided to the delegate for their removal was the founder and prime minister claiming that they were personally irritated over what the delegate had said in private communications (that were never released).
SHOCKED that the new revolutionary government refuses to acknowledge the work the ousted delegate put into the region previously, such as transforming it from 30 inactive nations to over 100 active nations and using their own personal resources to recruit for the region.
FURTHER SHOCKED over the forced narrative of the new revolutionary government that the former delegate was a 'tyrant', and the ejection and banning of nations that speak in favor of the former delegate.
ANGERED over the forced narrative of the new revolutionary government that the former delegate was a 'tyrant', and the ejection and banning of nations that speak in favor of the former delegate.
OUTRAGED over how the revolution was premeditated to occur at a time that the founder knew the delegate was inactive, so that the delegate had no say in the process.
FURTHER OUTRAGED at how the revolution affected the region of Madrigal, with certain key members of the Confederacy of Allied States threatening military operations on the otherwise peaceful residents of Madrigal for merely commenting on the situation.
BELIEVING that the Confederacy of Allied States has shown conduct that is unbecoming of a large democratic region, and that the above offenses and their sufferable manner of conduct are sufficient cause for their condemnation.
HEREBY condemns the Confederacy of Allied States.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Port blood » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:23 am
SkyDip wrote:How much more specific can you get than "Hereby Repeals" ...?
by SkyDip » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:23 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:49 pm
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: waltdisnia_1394043460
Condemn Auralia
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Auralia
Proposed by: Waltdisnia
Description: SECURITY COUNCIL ASSEMBLED;
While Recognizing that Auralia has had a positive impact on the World Assembly through the introduction of at least 12 different resolutions,
Noting Auralia's constant commitment to peace and trade among the members of the international community, and noting its many accomplishments,
But Disgusted at Auralia's use of illegitimate fraud and World Assembly Multiing to gain a Commendation for its nation, not trusting its own members of the international community to give its one,
And Aware that such activity and direct acts of deception against this body will not be tolerated,
WE DO HEREBY CONDEMN AURALIA
Approvals: 2 (Memoriabalia, Northern Union of Lenton)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 76 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Albrook » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:32 pm
Condemn The Confederacy of Allied States
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Confederacy of Allied States
Proposed by: NEO Rome Republic
Description: The Security Council,
RECOGNIZING that The Confederacy of Allied States is a large and active region with supposedly democratic ideals that recently underwent a revolution.
BELIEVING that as a region of this stature, the government of the Confederacy of Allied States should act with a certain set of expectations and decorum, and that the existing government not only ignored this set of operating principles, but acted in a manner that contradicted these expectations.
DISAPPOINTED that the manner in which the revolution took place was carried out was callous, and that the key proponent nations of the coup were malicious in the manner in which they treated observer nations seeking answers regarding the situation.
SHOCKED that the immediate cause of revolution were the results of a biased 2-hour "poll", and that these actions undermined the rights of the member nations of the CAS, that where unable to have a say in the workings of their government, as guaranteed by the laws set forth by the government itself.
FURTHER SHOCKED at how the revolution affected the region of Madrigal, with certain key nations of the Confederacy of Allied States threatening military operations on the otherwise peaceful residents of Madrigal for merely commenting on the situation.
CONCERNED that the above actions could influence the present and future decision-making of developing regions, causing poorly handled government transitions and furthering native disruption across NationStates.
BELIEVING that the condemnation of the Confederacy of Allied States may act as a deterrent for regions looking to model themselves after a larger, more active region.
DETERMINING that the Confederacy of Allied States has shown conduct that is unbecoming of a large democratic region, and that the above offenses and their insufferable manner of conduct are sufficient cause for their condemnation.
Co-authored by Ridersyl
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 78 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours
by Jeckland » Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:44 pm
Bodobol wrote:SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: fred_land_1390716945
Commend Testlandia
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.
Category: Commendation
Nominee: Testlandia
Proposed by: Fred Land
Description: Realising that commending nations for their out-of-game actions is illegal.
However believing that an execption should be made for The Hive Mind of Testlandia
Noting that Testlandia is owned by the creator of this game, and if it weren't for him none of us would be reading this.
Hereby commends The Hive Mind of Testlandia
Approvals: 3 (Fred Land, Mailam, Communist Bloodia)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 76 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days 8 hours
Should be fairly obvious considering that's literally all this proposal is.
by Inventio » Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:55 pm
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: loyd_1394256368
Condemn the West Pacific
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: the West Pacific
Proposed by: Loyd
Description: Armaments Trading should only be done with the members of the World Assembly and must be approved by the Security Council and the General Assembly. And only then should it be legal.
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 78 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days 11 hours
Sapin Military District wrote:If god doesn't exist, then why does a tissue pop up every time you take the old one out of the box?
Diviar wrote:Nah, Inventio isn't scared easily.
Divair wrote:Nonchalance is my default attitude.
by SkyDip » Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:38 pm
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: greater_tion_1394419888
Condemn Nolomolo
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Nolomolo
Proposed by: Greater Tion
Description: SEEING that nolomolo has sent several insulting telegrams to several nations.
KNOWING that many of these telegrams include foul language.
OBSERVING that these telegrams have caused some new nations to quit nationstates.
CONSIDERING that despite the actions of many nations to stop this behavior, nolomolo continues to send these telegrams.
NOTICING that nolomolo has used other nations as puppets to do his bidding and send some of these telegrams or spamming RMBs.
ACKNOWLEDGING that this has resulted in the deletion of innocent nations.
WE HEREBY CONDEMN nolomolo.
Approvals: 1 (Greater Tion)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 77 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Chester Pearson » Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:16 pm
Inventio wrote:SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: loyd_1394256368
Condemn the West Pacific
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: the West Pacific
Proposed by: Loyd
Description: Armaments Trading should only be done with the members of the World Assembly and must be approved by the Security Council and the General Assembly. And only then should it be legal.
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 78 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days 11 hours
If anyone can explain why the West Pacific should be condemned because armaments trading should only be done between WA nations, I'd love to know (through TG because this is not really a place for discussion). Also lacks an operative clause and is a blog.
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by SkyDip » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:38 pm
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: kerrybearyapolis_1394493851
Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: SC#134
Proposed by: Kerrybearyapolis
Description: WA Security Council Resolution #134: Liberate St Abbaddon shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument: As the armed forces of the brotherhood of malice, Osiris, balder, the north pacific, and the south pacific are attempting to destroy your nation protect yourself but do not solve the situation with action
Approvals: 1 (The Enderarmy)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 77 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days 1 hour
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:37 pm
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: chermania_1394592791
Condemn Libertatem
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Libertatem
Proposed by: Chermania
Description: RECOGNISING Libertatem, a formally peaceful Libertarian region that promoted Pacifism previously;
NOTING that recently Communist Beach, a peaceful communist region, was invaded on March 11th, 2014 at 11AM EST;
UNDERSTANDING that a formally peaceful neutral region accepting all ideologies has turned into an Anti-communist, Fascist region of non-pacifist nations and peoples waging war against many regions, with Communist Beach being the most recent example;
AWARE that Libertatem poses a threat to the many smaller regions on nationstates and many people. Also aware that Communist Beach was a peaceful region invaded by a group of Libertarian Hypocrites;
SHOCKED that such a peaceful neutral region has turned into a Fascist war-mongering menace to the world with it's war on communism and hatred towards pacifist communist regions. Also shocked that the War on Communism is focussed on rooting out totalitarianism, when several communist regions exercise great civil and political rights, much like former Yugoslavia.
HEREBY condemn's Libertatem for their hateful acts of aggression, fascist movements against pacifist regions, and war on communist and socialist ideology.
Approvals: 1 (Misley)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 77 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Chester Pearson » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:21 pm
SkyDip wrote:SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: chermania_1394592791
Condemn Libertatem
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Libertatem
Proposed by: Chermania
Description: RECOGNISING Libertatem, a formally peaceful Libertarian region that promoted Pacifism previously;
NOTING that recently Communist Beach, a peaceful communist region, was invaded on March 11th, 2014 at 11AM EST;
UNDERSTANDING that a formally peaceful neutral region accepting all ideologies has turned into an Anti-communist, Fascist region of non-pacifist nations and peoples waging war against many regions, with Communist Beach being the most recent example;
AWARE that Libertatem poses a threat to the many smaller regions on nationstates and many people. Also aware that Communist Beach was a peaceful region invaded by a group of Libertarian Hypocrites;
SHOCKED that such a peaceful neutral region has turned into a Fascist war-mongering menace to the world with it's war on communism and hatred towards pacifist communist regions. Also shocked that the War on Communism is focussed on rooting out totalitarianism, when several communist regions exercise great civil and political rights, much like former Yugoslavia.
HEREBY condemn's Libertatem for their hateful acts of aggression, fascist movements against pacifist regions, and war on communist and socialist ideology.
Approvals: 1 (Misley)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 77 more approvals)
Voting Ends: in 3 days
R4?
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Entropan
Advertisement