Naivetry wrote:From a purely historical perspective, I can. I can think of a bare handful of regions that have been around in the neighborhood of 6 years, besides the feeders. Texas, Wysteria, NationStates, Europe, Canada, some other RL-named regions... those are the big ones. (Mod, RP, and WA or NS-forums-focused regions I don't know as well.) And that's it. Regional atrophy is no joke, and it is statistically an enormous achievement for 10000 Islands to have survived for as long as it has, with as much strength as it has. Texas has records and can check, but I don't think 10kI has ever fallen below 150 nations or so. That sort of longevity and stability doesn't just happen.
To disagree with you again, I wouldn't count forum posts - post quantity speaks to a community's loquacity, not necessarily its quality, stability, or longevity. Time spent as an active and viable region in-game, on the other hand, does, because in any region without either a RL country name or feeder status, a quality, stable community is the prerequisite not just for sustained growth, but for continued survival at the size that TITO has consistently maintained.
As a founder of two regions myself I'm going to totally agree with the point "Regional atrophy is no joke". Trying to maintain a population and get them active is a lot of work. 10000 Islands has managed to do that. It's one of the few regions besides Texas, Wysteria, etc. that managed that kind of stability. I think this is a point that is worthy of mentioning in the final submission.
A minor change of Naivetry's point though, 10KI has never fallen below 200 (not 150). This is supported by Nsdossier records.
http://www.half-hp.net/uploads/pop_census_10ki.htm