Silly and Inapropriate Title

by **Kereptica** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:21 pm

Saurisia wrote:Because it's disgusting and immoral, Humans should not engage in bestiality at all! They should at least stick to their species.

According to whom?

by **Kereptica** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:22 pm

Satirius wrote:what if it was a horse in scale armor

then you get the AC bonus but you're flatfooted and the spell-penalty is increased

by **Saurisia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:22 pm

Us, you slow-witted Human!

by **Reformed Britannia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:23 pm

Satirius wrote:itt natural conclusion of every sex thread

So what are the laws regarding a human and an aroused stallion? Is getting your "Mr. Hands" on legal?

i see the string of pointless threads have reached their 'climax'

by **Mindhar** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:23 pm

This is the best thread ever.

by **Kereptica** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:24 pm

Saurisia wrote:Us, you slow-witted Human!

Rather circular, that is.

And really, for a nation which enjoys, en-masse, to pretend that they're dinosaurs to disdain us is rather laughable.

by **D-16 AI** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:24 pm

Kereptica wrote:
Saurisia wrote:Because it's disgusting and immoral, Humans should not engage in bestiality at all! They should at least stick to their species.

According to whom?

Dinosaur species...

by **Fasdia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:25 pm

Fasdia tends not to pass laws regulating people's private lives, if it doesn't negatively effect others. So as long as they're not abusing the animal, or trespassing on someone else's property to gain access to the animal, there is nothing illegal about bestiality/zoophilia.

by **Unilisia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:25 pm

Kereptica wrote:
Unilisia wrote:Because your way too free to possibly exist and because a reverse Mr Hands would make me vomit backwards.

Because the legal prevention of equine sodomy is integral to the survival of a nation.

When did I say that ?

by **Kereptica** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:26 pm

Unilisia wrote:
Kereptica wrote:
Because the legal prevention of equine sodomy is integral to the survival of a nation.

When did I say that ?

"Because your way too free to possibly exist"

by **Qwcasd** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:27 pm

No laws regarding it at all

by **Saurisia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:27 pm

Kereptica wrote:
Saurisia wrote:Us, you slow-witted Human!

Rather circular, that is.

And really, for a nation which enjoys, en-masse, to pretend that they're dinosaurs to disdain us is rather laughable.

Pff, what are talking about, we ARE Dinosaurs, silly!

by **Teccor** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:28 pm

Unilisia wrote:
Kereptica wrote:
Because the legal prevention of equine sodomy is integral to the survival of a nation.

When did I say that ?

You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

by **The Rich Port** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:28 pm

... It's generally frowned upon.

by **Kereptica** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:29 pm

Saurisia wrote:Pff, what are talking about, we ARE Dinosaurs, silly!

The important thing is that you believe it. Now go outside and play, kiddo.

by **Saurisia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:30 pm

Teccor wrote:
Unilisia wrote:

When did I say that ?

You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Wish I can blast that wall with a Bazooka!

by **Kereptica** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:30 pm

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Isn't it wonderful? :hug:

by **Saurisia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:30 pm

Kereptica wrote:
Saurisia wrote:Pff, what are talking about, we ARE Dinosaurs, silly!

The important thing is that you believe it. Now go outside and play, kiddo.

The important thing is that we are, now shut up and mind your own business, bucko.

by **Satirius** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:32 pm

Saurisia wrote:
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Wish I can blast that wall with a Bazooka!

for fuck's sake

Shitting this thread up with oblique partisan snipes is, for once, not allowed. FANI sucks enough as is.

by **Seculartopia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:32 pm

Unlike some of the harsher punishments here, those who have unconsensual sex with an unconsenting animal, sapient species, etc. go to rehab, the victim also having a form of rehab offered.

by **Saurisia** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:33 pm

Kereptica wrote:
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Isn't it wonderful?

Not if I have anything to say about it.

*Grabs bazooka*

by **Teccor** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:33 pm

Satirius wrote:
Saurisia wrote:
Wish I can blast that wall with a Bazooka!

for fuck's sake

Shitting this thread up with oblique partisan snipes is, for once, not allowed. FANI sucks enough as is.

I agree, though you were a bit vulgar. How about we either get back on topic or move this to NSG?

by **Maraque** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:34 pm

Seculartopia wrote:Unlike some of the harsher punishments here, those who have unconsensual sex with an unconsenting animal, sapient species, etc. go to rehab, the victim also having a form of rehab offered.

We exercise a similar practice to our Seculartopian colleagues.

by **Takaram** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:34 pm

All sex is illegal until consent is given in Takaram. Any non-human animal, or any human under the age of 18 (providing for the exception built in for 16-24 year olds), is considered unable to consent. Ergo, equine sodomy is illegal.

by **Teccor** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:35 pm

Our government's official stance on this issue:

Maraque wrote:Legal if consensual. And since most of our animal species aren't sapient creatures that's not possible.

Silly and Inapropriate Title

Who is online