NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Mark 8

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Thu Jan 29, 2015 3:01 pm

Yukonastan wrote:
Korva wrote:I think it would be fair to assume he wants to know a typical load for a given nation and a given mission.

Exactly what Korva asks. Assuming an average patrol/deterrent mission in the German countryside during the close of the Cold War, what can I reasonably expect the loadout of the Leopard 2A6 in Bundeswehr service to be?

Here you go: http://www.tank-net.com/forums/index.ph ... opic=14805

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Thu Jan 29, 2015 3:16 pm

Korva wrote:
Yukonastan wrote:Exactly what Korva asks. Assuming an average patrol/deterrent mission in the German countryside during the close of the Cold War, what can I reasonably expect the loadout of the Leopard 2A6 in Bundeswehr service to be?

Here you go: http://www.tank-net.com/forums/index.ph ... opic=14805


Thanks!
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd


User avatar
Orussia
Minister
 
Posts: 2894
Founded: Jan 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Orussia » Thu Jan 29, 2015 7:33 pm

Dostanuot Loj wrote:
Orussia wrote:Or a better idea, have some sort of deflector plate behind the gun so that they drop into a receptacle below the breech?
Kind of like this except much bigger.
That way you don't have to break NBC just to keep giant hunks of brass from rolling around on the floor.


I don't mean to quell your thunder but tanks have had this feature of a brass catching bag for many decades.
Not everyone uses them of course, but they do exist.

I figured that such an obvious solution hadn't been overlooked. :P
RIP Rhoderberg
14/9/2013 - 15/8/2015
May your spirit live on in FALhalla.
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:His penetrator is MASSIVE!
Talon independent nation wrote:And so missiles did come unto man, and man did see it was good, and did smite down the land battleships of his foe with totally awesome explosions.

User avatar
Thunbergia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 165
Founded: Jan 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Thunbergia » Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:52 pm

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=thunbergia/detail=factbook/id=357573

What am i missing for a realistic modern force?

It seems like i need more trucks.
Thunberg Dynamics is a South African Denel Dynamics Clone, selling South African Indigenous Military Tech.

User avatar
Yukonastan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7251
Founded: May 17, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Yukonastan » Thu Jan 29, 2015 10:15 pm

Does anyone have the case dimensions for DM33A1 120mm shells?
this guy is a fucking furry and a therian
Btw, here's my IC flag

"Purp go to bed." - Nirvash Type TheEnd

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:36 pm

I can give you a ballpark guess from memory - about 570mm case, with ~6" base diameter.
Overall length of that round will be well under one metre.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jan 30, 2015 1:31 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:It did.

I assumed it'd be weird if it breached NBC to do so.
Though on recollection I think it does. Which is kind of weird.
All autoloader Soviet tanks do. There's a hatch and the stub is thrown out. I'm 100% sure that this is done on the T-80 too. It does breach NBC, which is kind of funny, but only momentarily.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 30, 2015 1:57 am

Questers wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:It did.

I assumed it'd be weird if it breached NBC to do so.
Though on recollection I think it does. Which is kind of weird.
All autoloader Soviet tanks do. There's a hatch and the stub is thrown out. I'm 100% sure that this is done on the T-80 too. It does breach NBC, which is kind of funny, but only momentarily.

Last time you explained the T-80 autoloader to me, you suggested that it might unload spent stubs into the cassette that it has unloaded the new shell from. And that this poses issues in unloading the gun should a need to change munition type occur.

It seems reasonable to assume this is partially borne out of wanting to not breach NBC, if correct.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Radicchio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1303
Founded: Oct 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Radicchio » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:25 am

what is NBC?

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:34 am

Nuclear-biological-chemical.
All armoured vehicles of today (or certainly, the bulk of them), are protected against particulates of chemical or biological agents, and particles of nuclear material, from entering the vehicle.
This is normally achieved through maintaining an overpressure - the air pressure inside the vehicle is higher than atmospheric pressure so prevents external air from entering the cabin, IIRC. Air pumps may be used to maintain this overpressure.
Of course, opening hatches on the hull will compromise this overpressure.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:15 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Questers wrote: All autoloader Soviet tanks do. There's a hatch and the stub is thrown out. I'm 100% sure that this is done on the T-80 too. It does breach NBC, which is kind of funny, but only momentarily.

Last time you explained the T-80 autoloader to me, you suggested that it might unload spent stubs into the cassette that it has unloaded the new shell from. And that this poses issues in unloading the gun should a need to change munition type occur.

It seems reasonable to assume this is partially borne out of wanting to not breach NBC, if correct.
Oh, that might be something that might happen. I'm not sure though.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Ragnarum
Senator
 
Posts: 3889
Founded: Dec 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ragnarum » Fri Jan 30, 2015 8:59 am

Right, I'm here again.

Autoloader or manual-loader?
Don't copy and paste anything you see in a sig you fucking normie scrub
I deliberately made the star asymmetrical.
AUF GEHTS KAMERADEN
Here are my factbooks (Lots of WIP)

Ragnarum is not communist or even particularly socialist, just so you know.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jan 30, 2015 9:00 am

manual
Restore the Crown

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Fri Jan 30, 2015 9:13 am

Radicchio wrote:what is NBC?


NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) is the older, however more popular term to refer to CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear).

When it comes to tanks, NBC/CBRN protection means that the tank, somehow, has a system built inside it to protect the crew and internal components from any kind of foreign, harmful substances like radiation, chemical attacks, biological agents, and nuclear threats.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Nuclear-biological-chemical.
All armoured vehicles of today (or certainly, the bulk of them), are protected against particulates of chemical or biological agents, and particles of nuclear material, from entering the vehicle.
This is normally achieved through maintaining an overpressure - the air pressure inside the vehicle is higher than atmospheric pressure so prevents external air from entering the cabin, IIRC. Air pumps may be used to maintain this overpressure.
Of course, opening hatches on the hull will compromise this overpressure.


Leclerc uses an overpressure system to dispell toxic fumes when they fire the main gun, which is which why it lacks a bore evac.
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Fri Jan 30, 2015 9:45 am

Autololder is the best for ABC really.
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
Eldslandet
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 127
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eldslandet » Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:01 am

Due to the increased weight of 140mm shells would it better to use a manual loader or an auto-loader?

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:54 am

Questers wrote:manual

what heresy is this
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Sediczja
Minister
 
Posts: 2391
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sediczja » Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:30 am

Would it be possible (read: affordable and workable) to have a low-quality separate commander's thermal imager on a tank produced in the very late 70s/early 80s? Guessing no, but eh.
Last edited by Sediczja on Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
A holy place can never exist without enemies.
I'm not even an anarchist but whatever
DeviantArt
Anarcho-Saxony wrote:The USA was in NATO when the American Civil War happened

Carcelea wrote:WHEN IT WILL STOPS?????

Saiwania wrote:Instead of adjusting my world view to fit more closely with facts, I prefer to try to force the facts into my world view. I've come to my conclusion: that race mixing is bad, therefore I have to do my best to minimize what contradicts that and maximize what supports it. I desperately want the Bible's scriptures to say that God forbids interracial marriage.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:33 am

Sediczja wrote:Would it be possible (read: affordable and workable) to have a low-quality separate commander's thermal imager on a tank produced in the very late 70s/early 80s? Guessing no, but eh.

Are you America?
In which case, yes.

If not, the answer is not necessarily no.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12474
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:34 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Sediczja wrote:Would it be possible (read: affordable and workable) to have a low-quality separate commander's thermal imager on a tank produced in the very late 70s/early 80s? Guessing no, but eh.

Are you America?
In which case, yes.

If not, the answer is not necessarily no.

In essence it depends on what you mean by affordable, and what your level of technology is in the 70s/80s.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Sediczja
Minister
 
Posts: 2391
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sediczja » Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:37 am

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Are you America?
In which case, yes.

If not, the answer is not necessarily no.

In essence it depends on what you mean by affordable, and what your level of technology is in the 70s/80s.
Affordable enough for general issue, that is. If not I guess I could just restrict it to certain units. My tech level in 1979 would probably be on par with Soviet/US stuff from the same period, so eh.
A holy place can never exist without enemies.
I'm not even an anarchist but whatever
DeviantArt
Anarcho-Saxony wrote:The USA was in NATO when the American Civil War happened

Carcelea wrote:WHEN IT WILL STOPS?????

Saiwania wrote:Instead of adjusting my world view to fit more closely with facts, I prefer to try to force the facts into my world view. I've come to my conclusion: that race mixing is bad, therefore I have to do my best to minimize what contradicts that and maximize what supports it. I desperately want the Bible's scriptures to say that God forbids interracial marriage.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:41 am

Well, when I asked Velk why in Sapphire's proposed reboot major military powers did not have widespread use of thermal imagers and IRNV in 2002, apparently that was pretty common.
Not to mention, no RL ties and whatnot. Officially.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:10 pm

Eldslandet wrote:Due to the increased weight of 140mm shells would it better to use a manual loader or an auto-loader?


Autoloader is basically your only choice for large single-piece 140 mm rounds.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Well, when I asked Velk why in Sapphire's proposed reboot major military powers did not have widespread use of thermal imagers and IRNV in 2002, apparently that was pretty common.
Not to mention, no RL ties and whatnot. Officially.


Cost was a big factor. CITV was considered for the M1A1 Abrams but dropped even though a hole for it was cut in the roof. CITV only came along with the M1A2.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Dostanuot Loj
Senator
 
Posts: 4027
Founded: Nov 04, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Dostanuot Loj » Fri Jan 30, 2015 1:34 pm

Yukonastan wrote:Does anyone have the case dimensions for DM33A1 120mm shells?


Do you have the dimensions for any 120mm APFSDS that fits in the M256/Rh120/CN120-26/52?
If so, you have the case dimensions of the DM33A1, they're all exactly the same

Orussia wrote:
Dostanuot Loj wrote:
I don't mean to quell your thunder but tanks have had this feature of a brass catching bag for many decades.
Not everyone uses them of course, but they do exist.

I figured that such an obvious solution hadn't been overlooked. :P


Here's one in a Centurion:
Image
Leopard 1 IRL

Kyiv is my disobedient child. :P

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Heldervin, Lothria, Marquesan, Saradena, Victorious Decepticons

Advertisement

Remove ads