Beat ye' to it! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! As shown in the link: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ulfr-reich/detail=factbook/id=74011
Advertisement
by Aethal » Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:17 pm
by Questers » Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:24 pm
by The Republic of Lanos » Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:25 pm
Questers wrote:this is such a :randc: moment
Sumer: you need to list protection against guns.
RandC: no! it changes at range/type!
Sumer: I know that is a part of it
RandC: you didnt know that!
by Gallia- » Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:29 pm
by Kouralia » Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:01 am
by Rich and Corporations » Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:03 am
Dostanuot Loj wrote:Rich and Corporations wrote:not really
you're implying that one could say a vehicle is protection against 155mm CE and 120mm KE
I'm saying you need to list graphs for every possible CE and KE formulation at various distances to properly represent probablity of kill.
And, there are many metrics of protection. Sometimes only half of the mass of a KE projectile only needs to penetrate.
No, we are saying the same thing. I'm just saying distance is a non-issue for comparative trials. Your comparisons should, ideally, maintain the same distances and therefore be equal in that regard.
My attempt to simplify it may have caused you to think I meant all KE or CE are the same, but you know that is not the case, and that I was speaking of specific round characteristics per munition. I thought that was obvious but it may not have been. We are still saying the same thing, except I have taken range out of the picture as I expect it to be irrelevant to such a comparison.
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:20 am
The Kievan People wrote:Edit: So it is clear, according to the Serbian Officer who commanded the battery responsible for the shoot-down, he did *not* rely on visual or infrared detection. Engagement was persecuted entirely with radar.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Vitaphone Racing » Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:33 am
The Kievan People wrote:Inyourfaceistan wrote:I can't tell if this is serious or just...
The Yugoslavia story is a bit complicated, both because NATO had its hands tied by politics and because the Serbs got extremely clever.
1. Because of airspace limitations NATO was flying strikes repeatedly along the same routes.
2. Because of Italian politics NATO was operating most of its sorties out of one airbase. The Serbs had spotters on the ground in Italy reporting when aircraft took off.
3. The Serbs had a long-range VHF radar station in Montenegro that NATO could not attack, again for political reasons.
4. The level of education among the Serbian air defense officers was quite high, and knowing about the F-117 they made (unknown) modifications to their radars to improve performance.
5. The Serbs hyperactive relocation kept NATO from figuring out where the batteries were in a timely manner, so the F-117 could not be routed around it.
6. The F-117 had no RWR, so the Pilot would have had no idea he was under attack until he spotted the missile visually.
It took a perfect storm of NATO blunders and Serb successes for the shoot down to occur.
Edit: So it is clear, according to the Serbian Officer who commanded the battery responsible for the shoot-down, he did *not* rely on visual or infrared detection. Engagement was persecuted entirely with radar.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Aqizithiuda » Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:54 am
Rich and Corporations wrote:Dostanuot Loj wrote:
No, we are saying the same thing. I'm just saying distance is a non-issue for comparative trials. Your comparisons should, ideally, maintain the same distances and therefore be equal in that regard.
My attempt to simplify it may have caused you to think I meant all KE or CE are the same, but you know that is not the case, and that I was speaking of specific round characteristics per munition. I thought that was obvious but it may not have been. We are still saying the same thing, except I have taken range out of the picture as I expect it to be irrelevant to such a comparison.
no
I'm saying a gold CE projectile is different then a zinc CE projectile
you miss my point entirely
you fail to grasp the essence of my brilliance
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Krazakistan » Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:09 am
by Triplebaconation » Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:35 am
by Parhe » Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:58 am
by San-Silvacian » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:04 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:The Kievan People wrote:
The Yugoslavia story is a bit complicated, both because NATO had its hands tied by politics and because the Serbs got extremely clever.
1. Because of airspace limitations NATO was flying strikes repeatedly along the same routes.
2. Because of Italian politics NATO was operating most of its sorties out of one airbase. The Serbs had spotters on the ground in Italy reporting when aircraft took off.
3. The Serbs had a long-range VHF radar station in Montenegro that NATO could not attack, again for political reasons.
4. The level of education among the Serbian air defense officers was quite high, and knowing about the F-117 they made (unknown) modifications to their radars to improve performance.
5. The Serbs hyperactive relocation kept NATO from figuring out where the batteries were in a timely manner, so the F-117 could not be routed around it.
6. The F-117 had no RWR, so the Pilot would have had no idea he was under attack until he spotted the missile visually.
It took a perfect storm of NATO blunders and Serb successes for the shoot down to occur.
Edit: So it is clear, according to the Serbian Officer who commanded the battery responsible for the shoot-down, he did *not* rely on visual or infrared detection. Engagement was persecuted entirely with radar.
Even more complicated is how they became best friends after it happened.
by Lubyak » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:18 am
The Nuclear Fist wrote:I know this isn't really related to Military Realism, but. . .
Is it normal that I have this perverse desire to war with one of those nations with the sapient horses? Ponyists, I think they call themselves.
National Information
Embassy|Military Factbook|Greater Ponerian Security Pact|Erotan Heavy Engineering|Crepusculum Investment Bank|Borealias RP Region|FT NationI am an II RP Mentor. TG me if you'd like help with RP!Just Monika
by The Kievan People » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:24 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:A skeptic might argue that he has a vested interest in claiming that, because it either makes stealth look worthless, or makes his equipment modifications look highly impressive.
by Lubyak » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:28 am
Aethal wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:I just really want to commit my usual atrocities on brightly coloured horses. . .
. . . Stop judging me.
Beat ye' to it! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! As shown in the link: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ulfr-reich/detail=factbook/id=74011
National Information
Embassy|Military Factbook|Greater Ponerian Security Pact|Erotan Heavy Engineering|Crepusculum Investment Bank|Borealias RP Region|FT NationI am an II RP Mentor. TG me if you'd like help with RP!Just Monika
by Purpelia » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:29 am
Lubyak wrote:Aethal wrote:
Beat ye' to it! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! As shown in the link: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ulfr-reich/detail=factbook/id=74011
As have many, many, many other players. In all honesty, there is a reason none of the Pony RPers RP with people who just want to go, "Ahaha, ponies are stupid, Ima kill them all."
by Lubyak » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:31 am
National Information
Embassy|Military Factbook|Greater Ponerian Security Pact|Erotan Heavy Engineering|Crepusculum Investment Bank|Borealias RP Region|FT NationI am an II RP Mentor. TG me if you'd like help with RP!Just Monika
by Purpelia » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:32 am
by Tule » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:40 am
by Kouralia » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:41 am
Aethal wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:I just really want to commit my usual atrocities on brightly coloured horses. . .
. . . Stop judging me.
Beat ye' to it! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! As shown in the link: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ulfr-reich/detail=factbook/id=74011
by Lubyak » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:47 am
Kouralia wrote:Aethal wrote:
Beat ye' to it! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! As shown in the link: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ulfr-reich/detail=factbook/id=74011
Congratulations, you didn't RP out a major event and hold it as equal to someone wanting to RP out a war between themselves and another nation-state.
Obviously Kourian troops superior to Lubyakan troops. #Monarchy
National Information
Embassy|Military Factbook|Greater Ponerian Security Pact|Erotan Heavy Engineering|Crepusculum Investment Bank|Borealias RP Region|FT NationI am an II RP Mentor. TG me if you'd like help with RP!Just Monika
by Kouralia » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:53 am
Lubyak wrote:Kouralia wrote:Congratulations, you didn't RP out a major event and hold it as equal to someone wanting to RP out a war between themselves and another nation-state.
Obviously Kourian troops superior to Lubyakan troops. #Monarchy
Glorious Lubyakan Grenadiers fight alongside Kour Guards. Combine for greater glory.
by Lubyak » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:57 am
National Information
Embassy|Military Factbook|Greater Ponerian Security Pact|Erotan Heavy Engineering|Crepusculum Investment Bank|Borealias RP Region|FT NationI am an II RP Mentor. TG me if you'd like help with RP!Just Monika
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Indo States, Sarawak Darulhana, Tumbra
Advertisement