NationStates

JGscale gtfo

Imperializt Russia wrote:There is a scale and unless someone corrects me, I believe it's 25px to the metre.

1m=36px

Questers wrote:JGscale gtfo

NoUM8I'llWreckU

I'm thinking of using a magnesium transmission with my advanced powerpack concept (this would reduce weight of the transmission by 20 to 40 percent), and reducing the gearing to two forward and one backward (which might reduce the weight by an additional 10 percent), while doubling the size of the power split electric motor and doubling the output of the turbocompound generator to 200 kw.

drawing tank engines is fcking hard. luckily i have a lot of space

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/870 ... ngines.png

thanks to galla for the supine crewman.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/870 ... ineinc.png tanku has now engine

Does the hull seem undersized to you, or is that just the effect of big gun being big?

Imperializt Russia wrote:Does the hull seem undersized to you, or is that just the effect of big gun being big?

It is going to have in-arm suspension. The hull is a bit disproportionate, length-wise to height, though, if that's what you're suggesting.

Questers wrote:

Imperializt Russia wrote:Does the hull seem undersized to you, or is that just the effect of big gun being big?

It is going to have in-arm suspension. The hull is a bit disproportionate, length-wise to height, though, if that's what you're suggesting.

Yes.

Obviously, it's missing wheels suspension and tracks but it still looks low.

Imperializt Russia wrote:

Questers wrote: It is going to have in-arm suspension. The hull is a bit disproportionate, length-wise to height, though, if that's what you're suggesting.

Yes.

Obviously, it's missing wheels suspension and tracks but it still looks low.

It's not smaller than any of my other AFVs. Now, the main problem is that the turret is fucking giant but you can put a 152 on a T-80 chassis why not one of these chassis. So fuck it. I think it's sound—but it may look silly when its done, I'm not sure.

Questers wrote:

Imperializt Russia wrote:Yes.

Obviously, it's missing wheels suspension and tracks but it still looks low.

It's not smaller than any of my other AFVs. Now, the main problem is that the turret is fucking giant but you can put a 152 on a T-80 chassis why not one of these chassis. So fuck it. I think it's sound—but it may look silly when its done, I'm not sure.

looks gr8 m8

Questers wrote:JGscale gtfo

Nyet.

JG scale is an alright scale.

New Tsavon wrote:

Questers wrote:JGscale gtfo

Nyet.

JG scale is an alright scale.

So is anyone interested in seeing my new small penis pickup? I doubt it has much military usefulness but eh

Reminds me of..



700HP humma wit dose swag chromies yo

Would specialized mg units larger than mg platoon make sense in modern context?

Immoren wrote:Would specialized mg units larger than mg platoon make sense in modern context?

By MG units I suppose you refer to those 2 or 3-manned HMGs that they move around? I don't really think so.. The next step up from the platoon would mean a full company which I don't think would make sense unless you'd have something like a long fortified line to defend.. but even then that sounds kind of trench warfare-ish so I don't think it would make sense in a modern context. you could get away with it if you placed it in a specialized defensive formation tho

behold



penis size: -100

Republica Newland wrote:behold

(Image)

penis size: -100

I bet all the douchebags would buy it.

I have a question - should I replace HMGs with 7.62mm Gatling guns?

East Vlaricstan wrote:

Republica Newland wrote:behold

(Image)

penis size: -100

I bet all the douchebags would buy it.

I have a question - should I replace HMGs with 7.62mm Gatling guns?

Loss of effective range, loss of munition power, increased ammunition expenditure, no real improvements to mobility and no functional improvement in suppressive capability.

I'm onto Arty now.

Now, my Brigades go by the British Method which describes the following Artillery and Air Defence precautions per Brigade:

	Artillery	Air Defence
Light Role Brigade	'Field Regiment RA'	'AD Battery RA'
Mechanised Brigade	'SP Artillery Regiment (solely of SPGs)'	'Javelin AD Detachment'
Armoured Brigade	'Artillery Regiment'	'Javelin Battery'

Now, this seems rather small on the Air Defence Side, and a tad (to me) inflexible for the Artillery (especially having theoretically no rocket/missile artillery or CoBRa for a Mechanised Brigade). So, I'm wondering how to organise my forces.

For Artillery I was thinking of a Regiment consisting of Two Gun Companies, a Missile/MLRS Company and a CoBRa/Heavy Artillery Company. Each Company would be three Batteries of three systems. For the CoBRa company, there would be two Troops of CoBrA (one for redundancy) of two systems, then a Battery of three Heavy Guns. An Alternative could be having each company with its own integral CoBRa system, and entirely scrap the last company - or turn it into some form of AD unit.

For the AD Units I was thinking of three companies of three batteries. Each Company having: two batteries of three ShoRADS vehicles, and a battery of medium-level Air defence missiles (I dunno what to put there, maybe two missile launch systems?). Then each company gets two air defence radar sets, one primarily for redundency considering how much OpFor will want to destroy it.

Thoughts?

Kouralia wrote:I'm onto Arty now.

Now, my Brigades go by the British Method which describes the following Artillery and Air Defence precautions per Brigade:

	Artillery	Air Defence
Light Role Brigade	'Field Regiment RA'	'AD Battery RA'
Mechanised Brigade	'SP Artillery Regiment (solely of SPGs)'	'Javelin AD Detachment'
Armoured Brigade	'Artillery Regiment'	'Javelin Battery'

(Image)

Now, this seems rather small on the Air Defence Side, and a tad (to me) inflexible for the Artillery (especially having theoretically no rocket/missile artillery or CoBRa for a Mechanised Brigade). So, I'm wondering how to organise my forces.

For Artillery I was thinking of a Regiment consisting of Two Gun Companies, a Missile/MLRS Company and a CoBRa/Heavy Artillery Company. Each Company would be three Batteries of three systems. For the CoBRa company, there would be two Troops of CoBrA (one for redundancy) of two systems, then a Battery of three Heavy Guns. An Alternative could be having each company with its own integral CoBRa system, and entirely scrap the last company - or turn it into some form of AD unit.

For the AD Units I was thinking of three companies of three batteries. Each Company having: two batteries of three ShoRADS vehicles, and a battery of medium-level Air defence missiles (I dunno what to put there, maybe two missile launch systems?). Then each company gets two air defence radar sets, one primarily for redundency considering how much OpFor will want to destroy it.

Thoughts?

Army 2020 is transitioning artillery regiments to have one battery of light gun, one of AS-90, one MRLS and one Observation. Dunno if that's how it'll be deployed.

Imperializt Russia wrote:

East Vlaricstan wrote:
I bet all the douchebags would buy it.

I have a question - should I replace HMGs with 7.62mm Gatling guns?

Loss of effective range, loss of munition power, increased ammunition expenditure, no real improvements to mobility and no functional improvement in suppressive capability.

Noted.

Elan Valleys wrote:Army 2020 is transitioning artillery regiments to have one battery of light gun, one of AS-90, one MRLS and one Observation. Dunno if that's how it'll be deployed.

Hmm. But Army 2020 is a down-sizing of the armed forces, and not intended for a million+ man strong military. It also sounds rather small, isn't that like three 105mms, three 155mms and three MLRSs to support something like two thousand men's advance?

Kouralia wrote:

Elan Valleys wrote:Army 2020 is transitioning artillery regiments to have one battery of light gun, one of AS-90, one MRLS and one Observation. Dunno if that's how it'll be deployed.

Hmm. But Army 2020 is a down-sizing of the armed forces, and not intended for a million+ man strong military. It also sounds rather small, isn't that like three 105mms, three 155mms and three MLRSs to support something like two thousand men's advance?

Eurofighter PIRATE presumably steps in at that point.

Kouralia wrote:

Elan Valleys wrote:Army 2020 is transitioning artillery regiments to have one battery of light gun, one of AS-90, one MRLS and one Observation. Dunno if that's how it'll be deployed.

Hmm. But Army 2020 is a down-sizing of the armed forces, and not intended for a million+ man strong military. It also sounds rather small, isn't that like three 105mms, three 155mms and three MLRSs to support something like two thousand men's advance?

One battery=8 guns.

You generally assign one battery per battalion.

Elan Valleys wrote:

Kouralia wrote:Hmm. But Army 2020 is a down-sizing of the armed forces, and not intended for a million+ man strong military. It also sounds rather small, isn't that like three 105mms, three 155mms and three MLRSs to support something like two thousand men's advance?

One battery=8 guns.

Okay, that makes more sense.

So, for Each Brigade, give them... Two batteries of 155mm guns, one of 105mm guns, one of MLRS and one of observation? Totaling eight MLRS, 16 155mm guns and 8 105mm guns compared to my previous estimate of 18 155mm guns and 9 MLRS systems. The Observation can then have two CoBRa platoons and some UAVs?

EDIT:

Elan Valleys wrote:You generally assign one battery per battalion.

I can then do this, and the observation theoretically goes where it needs to.

I use 6 gun batteries in manouvre brigades' arty regiments and batteries of artillery brigades have 9 guns.