Cerberus Reborn wrote: It's not egoism if it's true
U just mad cause we're 2 sw4g 4 u
Yes. Exactly.
Thank you for pointing that out.
AR series? lol. I enjoy my rifle able to handle intense combat conditions and not jam on me, thank you.
Kind of weird seeing an AKM with an AK-103 magazine.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 10:22 pm
by Puzikas
I thought I would post this here, seeing as I don't really know anyone else who would be more interested than you crazy people. I love you guys
While I am yet to actually fire it, a nice big report has fallen into my lap on 4.6x30H&K, and I'm going to be reading it tonight while looking at a few bits of information on it.
Now if you know my basic opinion on 5.7x28, you may be able to guess what my thoughts on 4.6 is. But we will find out soon enough. I look forward to this in great amount.
AR series? lol. I enjoy my rifle able to handle intense combat conditions and not jam on me, thank you.
Kind of weird seeing an AKM with an AK-103 magazine.
Low-budget operator.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 10:43 pm
by Aqizithiuda
Puzikas wrote:I thought I would post this here, seeing as I don't really know anyone else who would be more interested than you crazy people. I love you guys
While I am yet to actually fire it, a nice big report has fallen into my lap on 4.6x30H&K, and I'm going to be reading it tonight while looking at a few bits of information on it.
Now if you know my basic opinion on 5.7x28, you may be able to guess what my thoughts on 4.6 is. But we will find out soon enough. I look forward to this in great amount.
I am really looking forward to hearing what you find out. It'll be interesting to see how it compares with the 5.7x28mm these days.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 10:52 pm
by Cerberus Reborn
Are you or Tule planning on developing the Ljungman?
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 11:17 pm
by Aqizithiuda
Cerberus Reborn wrote:Are you or Tule planning on developing the Ljungman?
If Tule is, I'm buying it from him and making a domestic version. If not, I'm copying the action with some minor changes and claiming it as my own for use until the 60's, when the AR-10 comes into play.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 11:29 pm
by The Archangel Conglomerate
Puzikas wrote:[*SNIP OF IVAN*] I actually talked in a similar manner when I first learned English. Minus all caps.
That conjures some interesting mental imagery.
Huh, Russian syntax is quite a bit different from that of English. Anyway, thank you for fixing my IVAN. I really should look into learning it for myself.
I also quite look forward to hearing your opinions/findings on the 4.6mm.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 11:33 pm
by Cerberus Reborn
Alexander Anderson. Kills vampires with bayonets. No guns, just bayonets.
It's like he's the god of MMW or something.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 11:37 pm
by The Greater Celtic Empire
With the Kel-Tec you don't see any ejector port either because it ejects forward using a tube above the barrel. RFB stands for R : Rifle F : Forward ejecting B : Bullpup. An interesting and unusual design. My experience is that it is also quite efficient.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 11:41 pm
by Cerberus Reborn
The Greater Celtic Empire wrote:With the Kel-Tec you don't see any ejector port either because it ejects forward using a tube above the barrel. RFB stands for R : Rifle F : Forward ejecting B : Bullpup. An interesting and unusual design. My experience is that it is also quite efficient.
Insofar as a battle rifle can be dubbed efficient.
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:15 am
by United Republics of Aralon
Benomia wrote:(Image) this gun has the best sights
Fordorsia wrote: Grip needs to be wider with maybe the ejection port more level with the trigger guard.
What do you mean by "more level with the trigger guard"?
This gun has the best sights: And the modern version,the ASP 2000: Unfortunately the project is on hold, because the original armorer is ill with cancer and they did not find a replacement yet. And the sights: b/c who needs frontsights anyways. If I could one handgun, this would be it. Unfortunately people seemingly forgot how to kick ass since the coldwar.
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:19 am
by United Republics of Aralon
Spreewerke wrote:INTRODUCTIONING! SPREEWERKE TREE OF KALASHNIKOV SYSTEMA RIFLE AND VARIATIONINGS.
The Greater Celtic Empire wrote:With the Kel-Tec you don't see any ejector port either because it ejects forward using a tube above the barrel. RFB stands for R : Rifle F : Forward ejecting B : Bullpup. An interesting and unusual design. My experience is that it is also quite efficient.
Insofar as a battle rifle can be dubbed efficient.
Hey Guys, sorry about anything I've said that may have offended anyone, it was NEVER my intention. Also, I want to personally apologise to San-Silvacian for my behaviour. I never wanted to offend you in the way I did and I am truly sorry. I guess a little joke got out of control.
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 2:50 am
by Samozaryadnyastan
Fordorsia wrote:That reminds me. Have there ever been any MMW thread contests?
Despite the skill gaps I'm sure we could get a kick out of it. A friendly contest between comrades.
The whole idea of an OICW/SPIW style of weapon is to completely replace standard issue rifles. As such, you don't want too heavy. I simply copied the SPIW weight requirements, since the weight of a fully loaded battle rifle is more than enough for your average user.
Your average user needs to operate harder, then.
Give 'em one of these and let 'em man up a bit, then issue GLORIOUS OICW THAT IS OF SPREEWERKE.
Can't help but think the carry handle would be better affixed to the rear sight trunnion around the gas tube mounting, FAL-style.
Samozaryadnyastan wrote:I don't recall the OICW challenge concluding. Can't help but think the carry handle would be better affixed to the rear sight trunnion around the gas tube mounting, FAL-style.
Well, none have been posted recently. I'm still kinda working on mine at the moment.
Mine fell off for my rifle.
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 3:34 am
by Samozaryadnyastan
I've yet to start. It's revision week this week, then two weeks of exams.
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 10:10 pm
