1234

[Saurisisia]

Surely, it would be a cakewalk for us.

[New Federation China]

My FT faction would smash you flat, yeah.
MT, it's harder to say, I have numbers and you have teeth.

[Kahskusk]

No, though I have no idea why we'd be fighting thrm in the first place.

[Zagadonia]

no offence but our media would probably just end up calling it a conflict, instead of a out and out war
the cold would create a problem so we would likely send the army mountain divisions with environment suits, and our tanks and planes can take -105 on a bad day so thats not an issue

[Pravengria]

no offence but our media would probably just end up calling it a conflict, instead of a out and out war
the cold would create a problem so we would likely send the army mountain divisions with environment suits, and our tanks and planes can take -105 on a bad day so thats not an issue

No, neither side would win.

[Kohlastan]

no offence but our media would probably just end up calling it a conflict, instead of a out and out war
the cold would create a problem so we would likely send the army mountain divisions with environment suits, and our tanks and planes can take -105 on a bad day so thats not an issue

No, neither side would win.

We would win

[Naustia]

We would not beat them, but they would certainly not 'win' in any sense of the term that didn't involve massive casualties, constant rebellions, and nuclear force. Against them, that is.

[The Grendels]

. Crush like a bug! An adorable bug we use afterwards as a colony to harvest resources from and sell our products to.

[Pravengria]

No, neither side would win.

We would win

Why does no one read the sig? It's in bold text. You'd be an easy win for us, unless your FT.

As for the fellow above me with the Antiquity rating.... Well we're screwed.

[Zagadonia]

We would win

Why does no one read the sig? It's in bold text. You'd be an easy win for us, unless your FT.

As for the fellow above me with the Antiquity rating.... Well we're screwed.

yes, they say numbers dont win wars but in this case its like 30 to 1 and we can make enough bombs in a couple days to last months a smaller nation just doesnt stand much chance against out industrial machine

[Kohlastan]

We would lose but we find no reason to go to war with them

[Vanum Norendum]

We would lose but we find no reason to go to war with them

I like to think that we would win.

[1337 G4M3R5]

We would lose but we find no reason to go to war with them

I like to think that we would win.

Hard to say...


It would certainly turn ugly fast though.


Not sure we'd want to fight 'em though, they seem like they'd benefit from some...sales...as would we...

[Vanum Norendum]

I like to think that we would win.

Hard to say...


It would certainly turn ugly fast though.


Not sure we'd want to fight 'em though, they seem like they'd benefit from some...sales...as would we...

I think it would be a lost for both of us actually, no winner in this situation. We are fairly evenly matched, and a full scale war between the both of us would probably end up with a nuclear holocaust. Thus, I think we would most likely be fighting each other in a proxy war, where... both of us would benefit from the boost in arms sales. History has taught that the one with the ground troops in a proxy war is the one that would lose (Vietnam, Afghanistan), or if both powers committed ground troops (Korea), then it would be a stalemate. So, either nuclear holocaust, lost in a proxy war with ground troops committed, won in a proxy war without committed ground troops (but with advisers and supplies), or a draw with no clear winner.

[The Grand World Order]

Us, without a doubt. If they wish to pursue the nuclear option, our ABM systems are some of the best in existence- it's what we get for having a nuclear arsenal much smaller than our similarly sized counterparts.

[Havl]

Us, without a doubt. If they wish to pursue the nuclear option, our ABM systems are some of the best in existence- it's what we get for having a nuclear arsenal much smaller than our similarly sized counterparts.

Would we beat The Grand World Order in a war? No. Would we beat them at Tetris? I don't know, that's a strange question.

[Xathranaar]

Yes. Their leaders would be easily fooled by our, "made it appear that we threw the ball, when in fact we did not throw the ball," strategy of deception.

[Copenhagen Metropolis]

Yes to the above,

and

Yes.
So much yes.

lol, troll much

[Kahskusk]

No

We hardly have enough resources and equipment to keep ourselves alive let alone fight another nation more than ten times our size.

[Maltropia]

No

We hardly have enough resources and equipment to keep ourselves alive let alone fight another nation more than ten times our size.

So, it'd be a Maltropian victory, then?

[Havl]

Maltropian Armed Forces	Havl Armed Forces
Army 150,000,000 Infantry troops 3,600,000 Artillery troops 240,000 Tanks 3,120,000 Trucks 25,000 Cavalry 15,000,000 National Minutemen (Militia) Air Force 3,280,000 Light Fighter craft 275,000 Heavy air craft 240,781 Bombers Navy 2400 Heavy cruisers 350 Patrol ships 1300 Light cruisers 37 Aircraft carriers	Capt. Steve Dublowski

An armed conflict between Havl and Maltropia would never happen, but if it did... I don't know how Steve would survive this one.

[Maltropia]

Maltropian Armed Forces	Havl Armed Forces
Army 150,000,000 Infantry troops 3,600,000 Artillery troops 240,000 Tanks 3,120,000 Trucks 25,000 Cavalry 15,000,000 National Minutemen (Militia) Air Force 3,280,000 Light Fighter craft 275,000 Heavy air craft 240,781 Bombers Navy 2400 Heavy cruisers 350 Patrol ships 1300 Light cruisers 37 Aircraft carriers	Capt. Steve Dublowski

An armed conflict between Havl and Maltropia would never happen, but if it did... I don't know how Steve would survive this one.

Brilliant. Best post I've seen in this thread.

And, though you'd obviously lose if Steve launched an invasion of Maltropia, your larger population would most likely halt any advance I attempted. An invasion of Havl by Maltropia would not succeed.

[Betalia]

We would be foolish to attack them.

[Grand Britannia]

Of course we would.

[San Leggera]

Of course we would.

Possibly, but not likely.