Imperial isa wrote:UAWC wrote:Fatatatutti wrote:UAWC wrote:Fatatatutti wrote:UAWC wrote:I like .45 better than 9mm too, though. Moar damage.
You're missing the point here. You can't just say "more damage" (and please drop the kindergarten spelling) when you're comparing different numbers of different types of rounds. Six 45s (remember, we're comparing an automatic to a revolver) can kill a maximum of six targets. Fifteen 9s can kill a maximum of fifteen - and not every target is going to shake off multiple hits.
.45 is only 2.43mm wider than 9mm Parabellum. I don't think it's that detrimental to magazine capacity, and there are plenty handguns with double-stacked mags that have upwards of 12 .45 ACP cartridges.
What part of "revolver" did you miss in my message?
My mistake. Now that I think about it, why would one put .45s in a revolver?
as Colt be doing it before you were ever born as it Works
It works, yeah, but why would you put anything smaller than a magnum round in a revolver?