The UEG-Space Command wrote:The thing is ignore cannons are very immature, if you want to ignore someone then just do it, you don't need to drag your attention on it.
And lastly my question was not answered. Either you answer a question or don't, I don't force anything because I can't force anything on anyone, Yohannes is not my nation to decide what it does.
Ignore cannons are indeed immature, as you put it. However, mixing modern technology with future technology to gain an advantage for yourself, expressing your disapproval towards others which has expressed their disapproval of submitting their sovereignty (IC wise) because you believe that you do have the absolute right to enforce Future Technology towards that of Modern Technology?
Bad.
I am, in fact, quite open-minded to the mix interaction of simultaneous technology (or let's say, a MT and FT entities rp with one another). I've roleplayed extensively with various fantasy-themed nations, and even in one case a PMT-FT nation.
However, when you try to enforce your view that you can simply override the well-established fact that one cannot mix MT and FT to gain a geo-political and military edge over other roleplayers, instead of doing so to co-operatively write an interesting story and scenario between the aforesaid FT and MT nations, then... yeah, I don't know dude.
The thing is ignore cannons are very immature, if you want to ignore someone then just do it, you don't need to drag your attention on it.
What I am curious about was the fact that you posted this:
The UEG-Space Command wrote:Upon first contact with a MT nation the UNSC has distinct protocol to try and make peace with them and start diplomacy, but not to baby feed contacts. The UNSC will most likely unofficially ask if Yohannes would like to have a representative in the UEG as a semi member which would help them be protected with ease as it would be considered a part of the UEG (while retaining full sovereignty.)
I don't know if anyone have told you this before, but you cannot really.. uhmm.. mix MT with FT, expect everyone to follow up with your idea, and complaint about how "immature" it would be for others to complain about your (without a doubt) shaky Rp'ed proposal.
The UEG-Space Command wrote:Either you answer a question or don't
Not really. I would actually love to answer your question, but I don't really like your poor OOC/Out-of-character manner and tone, therefore I am not going to answer your question.
And yes, there's nothing that you can do about it, because this is my thread and I am the OP. You have got to learn OOC ettiqutte and boundary before you start posting, and control the tone of your OOC manner. I would also suggest for you to read this:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=75017Mixing Modern Technology (MT) and Future Technology (FT) and OOC-wise trying to prove that you are right? = Bad idea.
The UEG-Space Command wrote:if you want to ignore someone then just do it, you don't need to drag your attention on it.
Well, you did ask about how I will react in such a situation (whereby you will try to enforce your Future Technology Rp'ed world into my Modern Technology Rp'ed world, and then expect me to submit my sovereignty to you, as a blunt way of translating your previous post).
Therefore, I simply answer your question all along.. did I?
Also, please don't think of me of being condescending here. I, in fact, am simply interested to hear your explanation more regarding this. I value open discussion, and this is me simply trying to discuss this with you openly, as a fellow roleplayer in NationStates. (please don't think that I am being angry or anything, I am not).
[Edited 1 time: changed than]
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:30 am
