NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
DASHES
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Stop debating.

Postby DASHES » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:15 pm

ATTENTION!

I'd like you all to read the OP once more.

Then, I'd like you to remember what this thread was all about, and then agree-to-agree to do what you can to help RP'ers make thier designs and military forces more realistic.

So matter what you think about War, World War II, NS World War II, or NS Wars fought like WWII, lets pacify that irrelevant discussion and focus on helping the new-but-unsure players.
If you guys wanna have your little NS-historian RP'er square-dance-brawl, I'm positive that you can take it to the TG's, or even another forum.

That was it. Sorry about rudeness and I'm really not trying to insult anybody, but I had to stem this tide before it turned into a flood of irrelevant posts.
Thank you for supporting this thread and understanding.
Last edited by DASHES on Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DASHES = Democratic Autocratic Socialist Holy Empire of Strongholds.


Need help making your Armed Forces or one of your Military units realistic?
Visit the current NS Military Realism Consultation thread immediately.
It can only help. It helped me.

User avatar
-St George
Senator
 
Posts: 4537
Founded: Apr 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby -St George » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:16 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:
-St George wrote:How is it that an II Mentor and a puppet of a nation that apparently knows more about rping than me can miss the point so badly?

My point was, if you dislike the way things are done so much, change them. RP with people and insist on the standards you set yourself.

Or is it easier to just sit back and bitch?


Yes it is. The amount of people who RP for fun and enjoyment and not for winning is growing smaller every day. Anybody who wants to RP with people who insist on good standards has joined SMS or an offsite regional forum.

You're mistaking good standards for the realism stasi that exists on SMS.

And you're wrong, btw.
Last edited by -St George on Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[19:12] <Amitabho> I mean, a little niggling voice tells me this is impossible, but then my voice of reason kicks in
[21:07] <@Milograd> I totally endorse the unfair moderation.
01:46 Goobergunch I could support StGeorge's nuts for the GOP nomination
( Anemos was here )
Also, Bonobos

User avatar
DASHES
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby DASHES » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:20 pm

Everybody, see my post above.

Srsly.
Last edited by DASHES on Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DASHES = Democratic Autocratic Socialist Holy Empire of Strongholds.


Need help making your Armed Forces or one of your Military units realistic?
Visit the current NS Military Realism Consultation thread immediately.
It can only help. It helped me.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:26 pm

-St George wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:
Yes it is. The amount of people who RP for fun and enjoyment and not for winning is growing smaller every day. Anybody who wants to RP with people who insist on good standards has joined SMS or an offsite regional forum.

You're mistaking good standards for the realism stasi that exists on SMS.

And you're wrong, btw.


I wouldn't expect you to know anything about SMS as I have never seen you on the forums there.

Not to mention the numerous other regional forums who still use NS sized budgets and militaries.

I'm not wrong at all. People have left NS and will continue to do so.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
DASHES
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby DASHES » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:32 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:
-St George wrote:You're mistaking good standards for the realism stasi that exists on SMS.

And you're wrong, btw.


I wouldn't expect you to know anything about SMS as I have never seen you on the forums there.

Not to mention the numerous other regional forums who still use NS sized budgets and militaries.

I'm not wrong at all. People have left NS and will continue to do so.


Right, and I'm going to have to ask you two to cease this pointless and counter-productive discussion.

How about I'll post an idea soon, and we on-topic.
My idea'll involve modernizing the old British Mark V tank(From WW1) for APC purposes. It'll be a cross between an IFV and a Heavy Tank.
Last edited by DASHES on Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.
DASHES = Democratic Autocratic Socialist Holy Empire of Strongholds.


Need help making your Armed Forces or one of your Military units realistic?
Visit the current NS Military Realism Consultation thread immediately.
It can only help. It helped me.

User avatar
Anemos Major
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12691
Founded: Jun 01, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Anemos Major » Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:03 am

DASHES wrote:How about I'll post an idea soon, and we on-topic.
My idea'll involve modernizing the old British Mark V tank(From WW1) for APC purposes. It'll be a cross between an IFV and a Heavy Tank.


That's too vague to be critiqued, to be honest. Even then, the highly exposed nature of the Mark V's running track means that any joker with a 20mm cannon or anti tank rifle grenade can immobilise your tank in one shot. On top of that, the Mark V has a relatively high profile already; there's a limit to the size of the guns you put in a sponson, so the only options you have are to hull mount it, which makes it impossible to traverse in any significant manner, or to stick a turret on top of the tank, which is essentially like driving a skyscraper painted with 'hit me' signs through a battlefield.

In short? Probably quite a bad idea in practical terms, even if you modernise the technical failure prone Mark V to modern standards. It's a fun idea, mind, and probably possible, but that's not what this thread is about, unfortunately.

(also New Nicks has already done something similar)
Last edited by Anemos Major on Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Senestrum
Senator
 
Posts: 4691
Founded: Sep 15, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Senestrum » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:11 am

hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar
Need help with lineart or technical drawings? Want comments and critique? Or do you just want to show off?
If so, join Lineartinc today, Nationstates' only lineart community!
We welcome people of any skill level, from first-timers to veteran artists.

User avatar
Tehraan
Minister
 
Posts: 2614
Founded: Nov 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tehraan » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:22 am

Senestrum wrote:hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar


fast attack craft? you jokin? :lol:

User avatar
Anemos Major
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12691
Founded: Jun 01, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Anemos Major » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:22 am

Senestrum wrote:hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar


need moar gunz

not attack enough

User avatar
Tehraan
Minister
 
Posts: 2614
Founded: Nov 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tehraan » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:23 am

That bomber on a launching rail.

User avatar
Tehraan
Minister
 
Posts: 2614
Founded: Nov 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tehraan » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:46 am

One thing that I have been looking for however.

What's the limit of an aircraft carrier's launch capacity and capabilities to handling a number aircraft in the air when in a combat situation.

User avatar
DASHES
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby DASHES » Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:23 am

Senestrum wrote:hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar


A. No offense, but ur spellin & grammar could uz sum work

B. Thats not a fast attack craft, thats a combinatination of a Heavy Battlecruiser and a Battleship, with twice the size and maybe half the speed of a Seawise Giant. Thats not fit for military service. That thing will be so slow and such a big target that you would be better scrapping it for metal and ammo so you can build Tanks instead.

C. Or, if your nation is a bit short on housing, take the guns off and turn it into an over-sized naval public-housing space. Or a prison super-complex. Or a resort/tourist attraction to bring in revenue. Or absolutely anything other than a warship.

Nice design, by the way. Its just too freaking big.
Last edited by DASHES on Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
DASHES = Democratic Autocratic Socialist Holy Empire of Strongholds.


Need help making your Armed Forces or one of your Military units realistic?
Visit the current NS Military Realism Consultation thread immediately.
It can only help. It helped me.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65549
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:52 am

DASHES wrote:*snip rant by DASHES


Me thinks Sene is being cheeky. ;)

Also I was wondering. My light infantry squad are 1+3x3. (Squad leader plus three three men fireteams)
Fireteam has team leader, automatic rifleman and anti-tank guy with LAWs and/or AT-4s.
And finally my question. Should team leader be:
A) "Mere" rifleman. have standard rifle and combat sight/non-enhancing scope and no other special equipment
B)Team leader doubles as designated marksman. Carries designated marksman's rifle with scope with enhacing zoom.
C)Team leader doubles as grenadier. Carries standard rifle with grenade lancher.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
DASHES
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby DASHES » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:03 am

Tehraan wrote:One thing that I have been looking for however.

What's the limit of an aircraft carrier's launch capacity and capabilities to handling a number aircraft in the air when in a combat situation.


Well, I know that the USS Enterprise can hold up to 90 Fighters, or 70 in normal circumstances.

However, the Big-E is the largest AC in the world, but from the capacity stats of a wide variety of AC's I've seen, the typical AC should have 22-50 Fighter-sized aircraft, or something like 20 Fighters and several Bombers.

That's simply my estimate and recommendation.
DASHES = Democratic Autocratic Socialist Holy Empire of Strongholds.


Need help making your Armed Forces or one of your Military units realistic?
Visit the current NS Military Realism Consultation thread immediately.
It can only help. It helped me.

User avatar
DASHES
Diplomat
 
Posts: 766
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby DASHES » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:36 am

Immoren wrote:
DASHES wrote:*snip rant by DASHES


Me thinks Sene is being cheeky. ;)

Also I was wondering. My light infantry squad are 1+3x3. (Squad leader plus three three men fireteams)
Fireteam has team leader, automatic rifleman and anti-tank guy with LAWs and/or AT-4s.
And finally my question. Should team leader be:
A) "Mere" rifleman. have standard rifle and combat sight/non-enhancing scope and no other special equipment
B)Team leader doubles as designated marksman. Carries designated marksman's rifle with scope with enhacing zoom.
C)Team leader doubles as grenadier. Carries standard rifle with grenade lancher.


In that case, Senestrum's cheeky is the average man's colossal.

If you would like my opinion, You should have your team leader double as the Designated Marksman. It seems to me that your Fireteams are sorely lacking any dependable form of long-range ballistic weaponry.
The Rifleman role can performed by your Automatic Riflemen, and the Grenadier role can be performed by your AT soldiers. Just be sure to give everybody extra ammo.
DASHES = Democratic Autocratic Socialist Holy Empire of Strongholds.


Need help making your Armed Forces or one of your Military units realistic?
Visit the current NS Military Realism Consultation thread immediately.
It can only help. It helped me.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65549
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:43 am

DASHES wrote:Fireteams are sorely lacking any dependable form of long-range ballistic weaponry.

I seem to crash into language barrier with this part.
Last edited by Immoren on Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Senestrum
Senator
 
Posts: 4691
Founded: Sep 15, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Senestrum » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:33 am

Tehraan wrote:
Senestrum wrote:hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar


fast attack craft? you jokin? :lol:


it haz 15 million horsepowers and can go at 50 knots
Need help with lineart or technical drawings? Want comments and critique? Or do you just want to show off?
If so, join Lineartinc today, Nationstates' only lineart community!
We welcome people of any skill level, from first-timers to veteran artists.

User avatar
Daenya
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Sep 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Daenya » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:35 am

Senestrum wrote:
Tehraan wrote:
fast attack craft? you jokin? :lol:


it haz 15 million horsepowers and can go at 50 knots


If you look closely, there is a stickman in a red cape holding a sword on the barrel of the first gun facing right.
Economic: -4.75
Social: -0.46

User avatar
Galla-
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10835
Founded: Feb 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galla- » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:36 am

Anemos Major wrote:
Senestrum wrote:hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar


need moar gunz

not attack enough


p sure those guns can fire nuclear shells into suborbital trajectories

dwi
Hello humans. I am Sporekin, specifically a European Umber-Brown Puffball (or more formally, Lycoperdon umbrinum). Ask me anything.
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.

Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...

New Nicksyllvania - Unjustly Deleted 6/14/11

User avatar
Bajireyn
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Bajireyn » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:44 am

Senestrum wrote:hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar

Are any of these ships for sale?
Right behind you...: UDL

User avatar
The Anglo-Saxon Empire
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13903
Founded: Nov 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:52 am

Galla- wrote:
Anemos Major wrote:
need moar gunz

not attack enough


p sure those guns can fire nuclear shells into suborbital trajectories

dwi

Doesn't mean you can't add more guns. You must have 7 turrets each with four guns for a total of 28 main guns.
IC Nation Name: The Glorious Empire of Luthoria
Monarch: Emperor Siegfried XVI

User avatar
Galla-
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10835
Founded: Feb 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galla- » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:54 am

The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:
Galla- wrote:
p sure those guns can fire nuclear shells into suborbital trajectories

dwi

Doesn't mean you can't add more guns. You must have 7 turrets each with four guns for a total of 28 main guns.


that is a ridiculous idea

be ashamed you thought of it

esp considering it has VLS F-23s and rail mount SLAMs
Hello humans. I am Sporekin, specifically a European Umber-Brown Puffball (or more formally, Lycoperdon umbrinum). Ask me anything.
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.

Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...

New Nicksyllvania - Unjustly Deleted 6/14/11

User avatar
Milograd
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5894
Founded: Feb 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Milograd » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:56 am

Senestrum wrote:hay guise this is my fast attack craft how i make it bettar

srsly the best FAC

YF-23 launchers o/o/o/o/

Senestrum wrote:it haz 15 million horsepowers and can go at 50 knots

I would expect nothing less from a FAC.

DASHES wrote:
A. No offense, but ur spellin & grammar could uz sum work

B. Thats not a fast attack craft, thats a combinatination of a Heavy Battlecruiser and a Battleship, with twice the size and maybe half the speed of a Seawise Giant. Thats not fit for military service. That thing will be so slow and such a big target that you would be better scrapping it for metal and ammo so you can build Tanks instead.

C. Or, if your nation is a bit short on housing, take the guns off and turn it into an over-sized naval public-housing space. Or a prison super-complex. Or a resort/tourist attraction to bring in revenue. Or absolutely anything other than a warship.

Nice design, by the way. Its just too freaking big.

lol
Retired

User avatar
Imperial DaiHan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 780
Founded: Jul 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial DaiHan » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:59 am

If a man were to fire a rifle from the standing position...

Image

Which was chambered in 20mm Hispano... Would he remain standing?
If you need lineart done, specifically edged weapons, bludgeons or firearms, and you need them done in a slightly stylized low-pixel way, and you need them done in under a goddamn hour, I'm your guy.

User avatar
Crookfur
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10829
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Crookfur » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:07 am

Immoren wrote:
DASHES wrote:*snip rant by DASHES


Me thinks Sene is being cheeky. ;)

Also I was wondering. My light infantry squad are 1+3x3. (Squad leader plus three three men fireteams)
Fireteam has team leader, automatic rifleman and anti-tank guy with LAWs and/or AT-4s.
And finally my question. Should team leader be:
A) "Mere" rifleman. have standard rifle and combat sight/non-enhancing scope and no other special equipment
B)Team leader doubles as designated marksman. Carries designated marksman's rifle with scope with enhacing zoom.
C)Team leader doubles as grenadier. Carries standard rifle with grenade lancher.


Personally I'm not entirely sold on the 1+3x3 thing but if you like it it shoudl work. the team leader should from your optiosn likely get get option C, not so much to allow him to act as the grenadier but to allow him to deploy smoke, illumination and markers as required. For Designated MArksmen just issue one or two weaposn to the unit pool and give the DM weapon(s) to whom ever in the squad (apart from the team leader) is best qualified to use it. It will likely mean that at least one fo the fireteams will miss one of thier specialists but ti does allow a bit more versatility. I would probably also issue a couple of UGLs on a pool basis aswell. Of course if you are beign uber awesome every one should get a 4x scope for their indivdiual weapon possibly a dual sighting one (i.e. ACOG with the holo sight on the top) or a switchable/variable zoom model(i.e. Spectre DR).
The Kingdom of Crookfur
Your ordinary everyday scotiodanavian freedom loving utopia!

And yes I do like big old guns, why do you ask?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Republica Federal de Catalunya, Tumbra

Advertisement

Remove ads