Infantry Discussion Thread, Pattern 7: Sword Edition.

by **EsToVnIa** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:08 pm

get a room

or at least go skype or something

by **Fordorsia** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:12 pm

Estovnia wrote:get a room

or at least go skype or something

You can join us if you like. Check out my curve. It really helps hit all the right parts in all the right ways.

by **Nirvash Type TheEND** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:27 pm

Estovnia wrote:get a room

or at least go skype or something

ay prem u should hmu on skype

cheers

by **Fordorsia** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:29 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Estovnia wrote:get a room

or at least go skype or something

ay prem u should hmu on skype

cheers

tag me in bro

Also hold onto your pants, I feel like making another basket-hilted broadsword.

by **Nachmere** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:46 pm

don't know anything about swords. forced to choose between ford and Patton. yeah sorry ford.

by **Fordorsia** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:54 pm

Nachmere wrote:don't know anything about swords. forced to choose between ford and Patton. yeah sorry ford.

Exactly. You know nothing. So shh

by **Nachmere** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 9:57 pm

Fordorsia wrote:
Nachmere wrote:don't know anything about swords. forced to choose between ford and Patton. yeah sorry ford.

Exactly. You know nothing. So shh

the problem is, if i accept your claim of curved light saber superiority i will have to redraw my cavalry saber, and i dont want to.

by **Fordorsia** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:01 pm

Nachmere wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:
Exactly. You know nothing. So shh

the problem is, if i accept your claim of curved light saber superiority i will have to redraw my cavalry saber, and i dont want to.

It's not that I think curved sabres are better than the 1908. It's that I think most sabres are better than the 1908.

by **Rhoderberg** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:02 pm

It doesn't really matter either way.

Swords have been obsolete since 1886.

by **Nachmere** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:04 pm

Fordorsia wrote:
Nachmere wrote:

the problem is, if i accept your claim of curved light saber superiority i will have to redraw my cavalry saber, and i dont want to.

It's not that I think curved sabres are better than the 1908. It's that I think most sabres are better than the 1908.

well mine is more the 1913, but that is the same really, is it not? also how come Patton went to France to learn how to sword and ended up making a sword so similar to the British one?(trying to salvage some learning from this).

by **Aqizithiuda** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:05 pm

Best sword type.

by **Nirvash Type TheEND** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:08 pm

Fordorsia wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:ay prem u should hmu on skype

cheers

tag me in bro

don't be gross

by **Nirvash Type TheEND** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:12 pm

Aqizithiuda wrote:Best sword type.

XVIII >>>>> XVI

by **Fordorsia** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:19 pm

Aqizithiuda wrote:Best sword type.

Stick a basket hilt on it and I'll agree

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Fordorsia wrote:
tag me in bro

don't be gross

; )

by **Aqizithiuda** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:37 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Aqizithiuda wrote:Best sword type.

XVIII >>>>> XVI

*bzzt*

Wrong answer! Try again.

by **Nirvash Type TheEND** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:49 pm

Aqizithiuda wrote:
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:XVIII >>>>> XVI

*bzzt*

Wrong answer! Try again.

Will you take XIX?

by **Ulfr-Reich** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:30 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Aqizithiuda wrote:
*bzzt*

Wrong answer! Try again. :p

Will you take XIX?

Nah brochacho, I'm good.

by **Aqizithiuda** » Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:30 pm

Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:
Aqizithiuda wrote:
*bzzt*

Wrong answer! Try again.

Will you take XIX?

I will take XIX for $10 000.

by **Imperializt Russia** » Sat Aug 01, 2015 2:21 am

Azenyanistan wrote:
Rhoderberg wrote:That sounds horrifying, care to elaborate?

Goddamn, that rivals some of the MRE stories I've heard on /k/.

I forgot about that post.

It's even more horrifying than the last time I read it.

Artillery is the best anti-zombie weapon.

: ^ )

From what I remember of the book, Yonkers was NS-tier hordewanking.

Artillery vs zombies equals zombies with missing limbs and still moving to kill you

I prefer to subscribe to the slightly more realistic form of zombies that still require their organs to function.
Ergo, small arms fire, artillery and incendiaries all work beautifully.

by **Puzikas** » Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:54 am

Tbh artillery would work fine even with the suggested zombies of WWZ and TZSG fame. The pressure of a detonating 155mm HE/ APERS would be sufficient for the most part to cause significant cranial damage via heamoraging that the brain would likely liquify; at the least it would cause a severance of the spinal cord (especially in the C1-C8 area) which would prevent neurological communication from the brain, which would turn it into basically a useless head.

Which is then used for a rousing game of head-football.

by **EsToVnIa** » Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:02 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:I prefer to subscribe to the slightly more realistic form of zombies that still require their organs to function.
Ergo, small arms fire, artillery and incendiaries all work beautifully.

But that's highly unrealistic of what a zombie is: a reanimated corpse that feeds on the living.

Puzikas wrote:Tbh artillery would work fine even with the suggested zombies of WWZ and TZSG fame. The pressure of a detonating 155mm HE/ APERS would be sufficient for the most part to cause significant cranial damage via heamoraging that the brain would likely liquify; at the least it would cause a severance of the spinal cord (especially in the C1-C8 area) which would prevent neurological communication from the brain, which would turn it into basically a useless head.

Which is then used for a rousing game of head-football.

>mfw football

by **Korva** » Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:08 am

this kinda belongs on the undead infantry thread tbh

by **Nirvash Type TheEND** » Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:37 am

Puzikas wrote:Tbh artillery would work fine even with the suggested zombies of WWZ and TZSG fame. The pressure of a detonating 155mm HE/ APERS would be sufficient for the most part to cause significant cranial damage via heamoraging that the brain would likely liquify; at the least it would cause a severance of the spinal cord (especially in the C1-C8 area) which would prevent neurological communication from the brain, which would turn it into basically a useless head.

Which is then used for a rousing game of head-football.

Yeah but that means passing up an opportunity to turn SPAAGs on fleshbags. Chunky pasta sauce Puz.

by **Oreenia** » Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:41 am

Would swords like This be realistic for a nation set in the late 2190s to early 2200's? 30% of our soldiers wear suits similar to the Infinite Stratos (except with more armour) or standard mech suits, which is what these swords are for
And it's just for a few divisions, specifically City Guards.

by **Rhoderberg** » Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:43 am

>using swords after 1886

For what purpose?

In any case, that's a godawful blade design.

Infantry Discussion Thread, Pattern 7: Sword Edition.

Who Will be the OP of the next Infantry Thread?

Who is online