^
omg needs a lord madthane
Advertisement
by The Soviet Technocracy » Thu May 12, 2011 11:56 pm
by OMGeverynameistaken » Fri May 13, 2011 12:04 am
by OMGeverynameistaken » Fri May 13, 2011 1:16 am
by Balrogga » Fri May 13, 2011 1:30 am
by OMGeverynameistaken » Fri May 13, 2011 1:35 am
Balrogga wrote:Calm down boys, the e-peen show is out back where it won't destroy the Thread.
by Arthropoda Ingens » Fri May 13, 2011 2:06 am
Hm. May want to make it a bit wider, in the range of a length/ width relationwhip between 5:1 & 8:1? Would be more stylistically in line with historical ships of the era you've ostensibly put in space, especially at the 5:1 end of the scale (8:1 is more modern-ish, as I'm well aware you know).OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Says you. Considering this particular drawing contains no references to power outputs, consumption of power per weapon, or even the width of the ship, you might ask for such details before you start making judgments.
Of course, while I can tell you that the ship is 180m wide at the midpoint, for the other two I'll tell you that it produces "enough" power and that each weapon consumes a "lot" of power. Those are metric measurements, BTW.
by Balrogga » Fri May 13, 2011 2:07 am
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Balrogga wrote:Calm down boys, the e-peen show is out back where it won't destroy the Thread.
Bah, you're no fun.
BUT, to continue from the previous subject, it's silly to make assumptions about other people's canon or the abilities of their ships, or their interior design. Or their power output. In fact, it's best to just assume everybody else's designs work exactly like they say they do, because there are so many conflicting canons and scientific theories on NS that there would probably be some sort of explosion if we tried to integrate them all.
by Thrashia » Fri May 13, 2011 2:12 am
by Balrogga » Fri May 13, 2011 2:32 am
by OMGeverynameistaken » Fri May 13, 2011 3:19 am
Arthropoda Ingens wrote:Hm. May want to make it a bit wider, in the range of a length/ width relationwhip between 5:1 & 8:1? Would be more stylistically in line with historical ships of the era you've ostensibly put in space, especially at the 5:1 end of the scale (8:1 is more modern-ish, as I'm well aware you know).OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Says you. Considering this particular drawing contains no references to power outputs, consumption of power per weapon, or even the width of the ship, you might ask for such details before you start making judgments.
Of course, while I can tell you that the ship is 180m wide at the midpoint, for the other two I'll tell you that it produces "enough" power and that each weapon consumes a "lot" of power. Those are metric measurements, BTW.
Admittedly, for a 1.8 km boat, the question is what you fill all that width with, but 'Reactors. More reactors. And sleeping quarters' probably suffices.
by Balrogga » Fri May 13, 2011 4:16 am
by Morningstar Coalition » Fri May 13, 2011 12:02 pm
Balrogga wrote:Yes, a Comedy of Horrors instead of the standard Tragedy.
Of course nothing would be taken serious, all done in jest and possibly extreme parody.
by Auman » Sun May 15, 2011 2:42 pm
Arthropoda Ingens wrote:Hm. May want to make it a bit wider, in the range of a length/ width relationwhip between 5:1 & 8:1? Would be more stylistically in line with historical ships of the era you've ostensibly put in space, especially at the 5:1 end of the scale (8:1 is more modern-ish, as I'm well aware you know).OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Says you. Considering this particular drawing contains no references to power outputs, consumption of power per weapon, or even the width of the ship, you might ask for such details before you start making judgments.
Of course, while I can tell you that the ship is 180m wide at the midpoint, for the other two I'll tell you that it produces "enough" power and that each weapon consumes a "lot" of power. Those are metric measurements, BTW.
Admittedly, for a 1.8 km boat, the question is what you fill all that width with, but 'Reactors. More reactors. And sleeping quarters' probably suffices.
by The Soviet Technocracy » Sun May 15, 2011 2:45 pm
by Clamparapa » Sun May 15, 2011 9:37 pm
The Soviet Technocracy wrote:hilariously i have like 3 10 km shipping spacecraft
nothing but iso containers
and suddenly bigger iso containers
thousands of them
by Feazanthia » Mon May 16, 2011 6:48 am
by Rentusera » Mon May 16, 2011 10:06 am
The Soviet Technocracy wrote:hilariously i have like 3 10 km shipping spacecraft
nothing but iso containers
and suddenly bigger iso containers
thousands of them
by Of The Arch ilands » Mon May 16, 2011 10:10 am
Xiscapia wrote:In Soviet Archland, OH SHIT FRANK IS BEHIND YOU!
18:47 Urarailgun In heaven the cooks are Archian, the engineers are Urarailian, the lovers are Delemontian, and the police are Britannian. In hell the cooks are Britannian, the engineers are Delemontian, the lovers are Archian, and the police are Urarailian
by Person012345 » Mon May 16, 2011 1:02 pm
Rentusera wrote:The Soviet Technocracy wrote:hilariously i have like 3 10 km shipping spacecraft
nothing but iso containers
and suddenly bigger iso containers
thousands of them
i have one spaceship ever
Decree: it kills small nations with one song
...at least as soon as I actually upgrade it from a glorified music-playing ship.
music
space
by Xenohumanity » Mon May 16, 2011 1:15 pm
by Arthropoda Ingens » Mon May 16, 2011 2:37 pm
ISO 668 is so powerful, it transcends the borders between planets, nations, even species.The Soviet Technocracy wrote:hilariously i have like 3 10 km shipping spacecraft
nothing but iso containers
and suddenly bigger iso containers
thousands of them
by Rentusera » Mon May 16, 2011 6:00 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement