New Zepuha wrote:Oneracon wrote:Then what is the point
of creating the separate party? If the ideologies are so similar then they don't need to be separate parties, or it shouldn't be a hassle for one outside party member to shift their official membership.
So I assume then we have to make them honorary members? This bill just seems to limit free choice
of the parties all for limiting party membership.
It proposes very reasonable limits which still allow Senators to declare their support for parties beyond their primary affiliation, as I said it is a compromise.
This bill creates categories
of membership for the purpose
of administration
of the Senate, and does not place any restrictions on the rights
of Honorary members within the party they have Honorary membership for.
If a party wishes for Honorary members to have equal say in party affairs then this bill does not interfere with it at all, it does not affect internal party policies any more than the minimum required to implement these common standards.