NationStates

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:38 pm**

Ceannairceach wrote:
Gallup wrote:Want a moderate conservative? I'm your man.

Moderate? Laughable! You're against secularism, abortion and euthanasia, while being in favor of corporate personhood and religion. How would you expect the majorly liberal Senate to vote for you?

And he's against Gay marriage and LGBT rights

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:38 pm**

Ceannairceach wrote:
Gallup wrote:Want a moderate conservative? I'm your man.

Moderate? Laughable! You're against secularism, abortion and euthanasia, while being in favor of corporate personhood and religion. How would you expect the majorly liberal Senate to vote for you?

how do you expect any left liberal on here to vote for a conservative or centrist me?

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:38 pm**

Ceannairceach wrote:
Gallup wrote:Want a moderate conservative? I'm your man.

Moderate? Laughable! You're against secularism, abortion and euthanasia, while being in favor of corporate personhood and religion. How would you expect the majorly liberal Senate to vote for you?

I'm not running to get votes. I'm running because I think I have the right ideas.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:38 pm**

TaQud wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Moderate? Laughable! You're against secularism, abortion and euthanasia, while being in favor of corporate personhood and religion. How would you expect the majorly liberal Senate to vote for you?

how do you expect any left liberal on here to vote for a conservative or centrist me?

The Progress Coalition is electing a relative centrist; Aeken.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:39 pm**

Ceannairceach wrote:
TaQud wrote:how do you expect any left liberal on here to vote for a conservative or centrist me?

The Progress coalition is electing a relative centrist; Aeken.

well I never heard of this coalition til today....and why Aeken?

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:41 pm**

TaQud wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:The Progress coalition is electing a relative centrist; Aeken.

well I never heard of this coalition til today....and why Aeken?

As a compromise to bring the Progressive-Conservatives into the fold; We are forgoing a deep left candidate in the interest of maximizing participation in the coalition government, while having the farther left parties take various positions in the cabinet. A Prog-Con is going to be Vice President, a Communist the Prime Minister, and a Totally Rad the Deputy Prime Minister. The rest of the ministries are divided amongst the participating parties.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:44 pm**

BTW will the President have advisors and/or a cabinet?

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:45 pm**

TaQud wrote:BTW will the President have advisors and/or a cabinet?

Well, the ministries are sort of taking that role.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:46 pm**

Jerusalemian wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Moderate? Laughable! You're against secularism, abortion and euthanasia, while being in favor of corporate personhood and religion. How would you expect the majorly liberal Senate to vote for you?

And he's against Gay marriage and LGBT rights

Chances of him getting a vote from a liberal? 0%

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:46 pm**

TaQud wrote:
Jerusalemian wrote:And he's against Gay marriage and LGBT rights

Chances of him getting a vote from a liberal? 0%

yep.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:47 pm**

TaQud wrote:
Jerusalemian wrote:And he's against Gay marriage and LGBT rights

Chances of him getting a vote from a liberal? 0%

Hell, half of the right wouldn't even vote for him in that case!

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:48 pm**

What all this about gay marriage? I'm pro-LGBT.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:48 pm**

Gallup wrote:What all this about gay marriage? I'm pro-LGBT.

The chart says your against it.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:49 pm**

Jerusalemian wrote:
Gallup wrote:What all this about gay marriage? I'm pro-LGBT.

The chart says your against it.

Whaa... *check chart* oops. Could the guy who made that change it?

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 1:50 pm**

Gallup wrote:
Jerusalemian wrote:The chart says your against it.

Whaa... *check chart* oops. Could the guy who made that change it?

!!!

Not good. I would encourage all candidates to double check if their positions are right.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:03 pm**

From the Monarchist Party HQ:

Strykla wrote:
Irredento wrote:This is the thread in which we will conduct our parade.

Starting tomorrow at 1pm GMT, our Royalist Guard will conduct a joint parade with the NIFP in front of the USLP building where this "festival" is being held. We shall march into the midst of this parade and drown out the voices of these communist scum!

The foolish useful idiots in the centre of the Senate do not even realise that they are accepting communist hegemony by endorsing this festival.

I would also encourage all members to take part in debates in that thread starting now. Argue the case for monarchism.

Is the Royalist Guard going to march with weapons loaded?

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:04 pm**

Lemanrussland wrote:From the Monarchist Party HQ:

Strykla wrote:Is the Royalist Guard going to march with weapons loaded?

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

Were is the national army when you need it!

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:06 pm**

Lemanrussland wrote:From the Monarchist Party HQ:

Strykla wrote:Is the Royalist Guard going to march with weapons loaded?

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

When is the PLEA set to pass? At least then we could have a police force to prevent violence.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:07 pm**

Chestaan wrote:
Lemanrussland wrote:From the Monarchist Party HQ:

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

When is the PLEA set to pass? At least then we could have a police force to prevent violence.

11:54 AM EDT, Saturday.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:08 pm**

TaQud wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Moderate? Laughable! You're against secularism, abortion and euthanasia, while being in favor of corporate personhood and religion. How would you expect the majorly liberal Senate to vote for you?

how do you expect any left liberal on here to vote for a conservative or centrist me?

Liberals:

CHANGE! When we are finished smoking weed.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:09 pm**

The God-Realm wrote:
TaQud wrote:how do you expect any left liberal on here to vote for a conservative or centrist me?

Liberals:

CHANGE! When we are finished smoking weed.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:09 pm**

Lemanrussland wrote:From the Monarchist Party HQ:

Strykla wrote:Is the Royalist Guard going to march with weapons loaded?

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

I say we slaughter them.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:10 pm**

The God-Realm wrote:
Lemanrussland wrote:From the Monarchist Party HQ:

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

I say we slaughter them.

We shouldn't go Weimar Germany here, if you ask me...

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:10 pm**

The God-Realm wrote:
Lemanrussland wrote:From the Monarchist Party HQ:

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

I say we slaughter them.

We just need some means of controlling the situation in case violence breaks out. I don't want this to be like Weimar, except with no police...

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 2:10 pm**

The God-Realm wrote:
Lemanrussland wrote:From the Monarchist Party HQ:

This is getting extremely dangerous. A national army, or at least an emergency national militia is desperately needed. These people are threatening rule of law, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech in our great nation.

I say we slaughter them.

Apart from the fact that that is a ridiculous suggestion, what do you propose we slaughter them with? We have no police or army and the USLP militia is likely outmatched by the reactionary militias.

NationStates

NSG Senate Lobby (OLD THREAD, DO NOT POST)