I have seen it come close to that before.
Advertisement
by The Zeonic States » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:56 pm
by Gallup » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:56 pm
by Ainin » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:56 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Mystletainn wrote:Now now...
The moderators tend to frown upon such statements, yes. But if you claim that certain minorities deserved genocide, as has happened in previous TETs, you will be allowed to continue your NSG existence without even a firm reprimande. According to the 'logic' of the teenage and twenty-something moderators of the NationStates forum genocide is less offensive than innuendos. Welcome to the 21st century, ladies and gentlemen!
by Kherkov » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:57 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:57 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Mystletainn » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:57 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Mystletainn wrote:Now now...
The moderators tend to frown upon such statements, yes. But if you claim that certain minorities deserved genocide, as has happened in previous TETs, you will be allowed to continue your NSG existence without even a firm reprimande. According to the 'logic' of the teenage and twenty-something moderators of the NationStates forum genocide is less offensive than innuendos. Welcome to the 21st century, ladies and gentlemen!
by Gallup » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:57 pm
Ainin wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:The moderators tend to frown upon such statements, yes. But if you claim that certain minorities deserved genocide, as has happened in previous TETs, you will be allowed to continue your NSG existence without even a firm reprimande. According to the 'logic' of the teenage and twenty-something moderators of the NationStates forum genocide is less offensive than innuendos. Welcome to the 21st century, ladies and gentlemen!
WP:Wall of Text
by Gallup » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:57 pm
by Ainin » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:57 pm
Mystletainn wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:The moderators tend to frown upon such statements, yes. But if you claim that certain minorities deserved genocide, as has happened in previous TETs, you will be allowed to continue your NSG existence without even a firm reprimande. According to the 'logic' of the teenage and twenty-something moderators of the NationStates forum genocide is less offensive than innuendos. Welcome to the 21st century, ladies and gentlemen!
This is the main reason I reluctantly sit around F7
by Toronina » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:58 pm
Mystletainn wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:The moderators tend to frown upon such statements, yes. But if you claim that certain minorities deserved genocide, as has happened in previous TETs, you will be allowed to continue your NSG existence without even a firm reprimande. According to the 'logic' of the teenage and twenty-something moderators of the NationStates forum genocide is less offensive than innuendos. Welcome to the 21st century, ladies and gentlemen!
This is the main reason I reluctantly sit around F7
by Gallup » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:58 pm
by The Zeonic States » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:58 pm
by Gallup » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:58 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:59 pm
Ainin wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:The moderators tend to frown upon such statements, yes. But if you claim that certain minorities deserved genocide, as has happened in previous TETs, you will be allowed to continue your NSG existence without even a firm reprimande. According to the 'logic' of the teenage and twenty-something moderators of the NationStates forum genocide is less offensive than innuendos. Welcome to the 21st century, ladies and gentlemen!
WP:Wall of Text
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Gallup » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:59 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
