Page 167 of 500

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:23 pm
by The Holy Therns
Hurdegaryp wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:
Placing your entire army on a wide open and giving them the choice of either using their artillery or staying shielded and passively waiting until the droids passed their shield and got too close for their artillery is not what I'd call competent, myself.

It was a disturbingly traditional form of warfare, yes. Rumour has it that real warfare actually is more horrifying than picturesque, and it is not as if we go to the movies to truly question human nature.


The practical - and still dramatically fancy - approach would be showing them employ guerrilla tactics, lead the droids into swamps and ambush them. But then, I suppose it'd feel like an Ewok rehash.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:24 pm
by New haven america
Senyosu wrote:
Coffee Cakes wrote:
I like Youtube. I watch cat and music videos on there. D:

It has it's merits, but the comments section reeks of fecal matter.

Good thing the 3DS provides comment-free Youtube.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:26 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Coffee Cakes wrote:True. Fuck the comment section.

I hated what they did to it over the years.


Youtube or the users?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:27 pm
by Coffee Cakes
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Coffee Cakes wrote:True. Fuck the comment section.

I hated what they did to it over the years.


Same. That and the removing of everything it feels like.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:33 pm
by Blazedtown
Long live Secularist Theocratic Emperor Barrack I.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:37 pm
by Hurdegaryp
The Holy Therns wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:It was a disturbingly traditional form of warfare, yes. Rumour has it that real warfare actually is more horrifying than picturesque, and it is not as if we go to the movies to truly question human nature.

The practical - and still dramatically fancy - approach would be showing them employ guerrilla tactics, lead the droids into swamps and ambush them. But then, I suppose it'd feel like an Ewok rehash.

Also there is this thing about an underwater kingdom suddenly mobilizing a whole bloody army and bringing the whole belligerent group effort on dry land. Logic dictates that an amphibious civilization with all their major settlements existing on the bottom of the sea (or lakes) would be more efficient in underwater combat.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:39 pm
by The Holy Therns
Hurdegaryp wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:The practical - and still dramatically fancy - approach would be showing them employ guerrilla tactics, lead the droids into swamps and ambush them. But then, I suppose it'd feel like an Ewok rehash.

Also there is this thing about an underwater kingdom suddenly mobilizing a whole bloody army and bringing the whole belligerent group effort on dry land. Logic dictates that an amphibious civilization with all their major settlements existing on the bottom of the sea (or lakes) would be more efficient in underwater combat.


That part's more understandable - their purpose was to draw a ground army away from the city.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:41 pm
by Hurdegaryp
The Holy Therns wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:Also there is this thing about an underwater kingdom suddenly mobilizing a whole bloody army and bringing the whole belligerent group effort on dry land. Logic dictates that an amphibious civilization with all their major settlements existing on the bottom of the sea (or lakes) would be more efficient in underwater combat.

That part's more understandable - their purpose was to draw a ground army away from the city.

Also I'm pretty sure they're capable of generating EMPs in the Star Wars universe. Those droid armies didn't look spectacularly EMP-resistent.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:47 pm
by Firsthome
Blazedtown wrote:Long live Secularist Theocratic Emperor Barrack I.


I have liberal view, and i agree.

they kept playing this recording in school ITS A PLOT!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:50 pm
by Senyosu
Firsthome is cute.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:55 pm
by Stern des Meeres
I finally gave in and bought 1989. Life's too short to not listen to cheesy pop music.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:55 pm
by Ethel mermania
Hurdegaryp wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:That part's more understandable - their purpose was to draw a ground army away from the city.

Also I'm pretty sure they're capable of generating EMPs in the Star Wars universe. Those droid armies didn't look spectacularly EMP-resistent.

Quite frankly, I found the entire empire engineering effort, quite poor. What is it with villains and piss poor design?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:58 pm
by Spoder
Hurdegaryp wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:The practical - and still dramatically fancy - approach would be showing them employ guerrilla tactics, lead the droids into swamps and ambush them. But then, I suppose it'd feel like an Ewok rehash.

Also there is this thing about an underwater kingdom suddenly mobilizing a whole bloody army and bringing the whole belligerent group effort on dry land. Logic dictates that an amphibious civilization with all their major settlements existing on the bottom of the sea (or lakes) would be more efficient in underwater combat.

Let's be real.

Star Wars warfare is hugely impractical.

I mean, seriously? Massive-scale conventional wars? That's a step back into 3000BCE - 500AD, when the wars lasted around ten years.


I'd expect most of the warfare in Star Wars to be conducted with either COIN operations, or through absolutely colossal ships like The Executor with WMDs, wiping away the topography of worlds.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:58 pm
by Firsthome
Coffee Cakes wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:I hated what they did to it over the years.


Same. That and the removing of everything it feels like.



because Sony somehow owns the 80's transformers? yeah...

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:58 pm
by Senyosu
Spoder wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:Also there is this thing about an underwater kingdom suddenly mobilizing a whole bloody army and bringing the whole belligerent group effort on dry land. Logic dictates that an amphibious civilization with all their major settlements existing on the bottom of the sea (or lakes) would be more efficient in underwater combat.

Let's be real.

Star Wars warfare is hugely impractical.

I mean, seriously? Massive-scale conventional wars? That's a step back into 3000BCE - 500AD, when the wars lasted around ten years.


I'd expect most of the warfare in Star Wars to be conducted with either COIN operations, or through absolutely colossal ships like The Executor with WMDs, wiping away the topography of worlds.

thank you spoder

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:58 pm
by The Holy Therns
Ethel mermania wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:Also I'm pretty sure they're capable of generating EMPs in the Star Wars universe. Those droid armies didn't look spectacularly EMP-resistent.

Quite frankly, I found the entire empire engineering effort, quite poor. What is it with villains and piss poor design?


...The Trade Federation wasn't the Empire. SHEESH!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:59 pm
by Firsthome
Senyosu wrote:Firsthome is cute.


:meh: :(

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:59 pm
by Senyosu
The Holy Therns wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:Quite frankly, I found the entire empire engineering effort, quite poor. What is it with villains and piss poor design?


...The Trade Federation wasn't the Empire. SHEESH!

Did the Trade Federation not get incorporated into the Empire though?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:59 pm
by Spoder
Ethel mermania wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:Also I'm pretty sure they're capable of generating EMPs in the Star Wars universe. Those droid armies didn't look spectacularly EMP-resistent.

Quite frankly, I found the entire empire engineering effort, quite poor. What is it with villains and piss poor design?

Tie Defender.

Tie Interceptor.


Two fighters that completely outclassed everything those rebels could throw at them.


Hell, if you read the comics and the EU and the like, there's quite a few exceptional pilots in the Imperial Navy.

Audiences in the late 70s wanted to see their heroes destroy the bad guys.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:00 pm
by Senyosu
Firsthome wrote:
Senyosu wrote:Firsthome is cute.


:meh: :(

You remind me of this one poster.

What's his name?

Slembana or something?

Am I even allowed to speak of former players anyways?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:00 pm
by Firsthome
Senyosu wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:
...The Trade Federation wasn't the Empire. SHEESH!

Did the Trade Federation not get incorporated into the Empire though?

not really.

the Trade federation crashed, and was so inept that it wasn't absorbed.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:01 pm
by Stern des Meeres
Senyosu wrote:
Firsthome wrote:
:meh: :(

You remind me of this one poster.

What's his name?

Slembana or something?

Am I even allowed to speak of former players anyways?

Only in whispers and legends.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:02 pm
by Senyosu
Stern des Meeres wrote:
Senyosu wrote:You remind me of this one poster.

What's his name?

Slembana or something?

Am I even allowed to speak of former players anyways?

Only in whispers and legends.

Oh my.
Firsthome wrote:
Senyosu wrote:Did the Trade Federation not get incorporated into the Empire though?

not really.

the Trade federation crashed, and was so inept that it wasn't absorbed.

Sauce?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:04 pm
by Muinordgrad
Stern des Meeres wrote:
Senyosu wrote:You remind me of this one poster.

What's his name?

Slembana or something?

Am I even allowed to speak of former players anyways?

Only in whispers and legends.

Speaking of former players...

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:05 pm
by Senyosu
Muinordgrad wrote:
Stern des Meeres wrote:Only in whispers and legends.

Speaking of former players...

Oh hello Hydro.