by Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:32 am
by Farnhamia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:36 am
by Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:37 am
Farnhamia wrote:I believe the question of secession was settled during the 1860s. It's not a viable threat.
by Obvious Pseudonym » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:38 am
by Farnhamia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:44 am
greed and death wrote:Farnhamia wrote:I believe the question of secession was settled during the 1860s. It's not a viable threat.
You don't seem to live in Texas.
And violent resistance is always a viable threat.
Lackland Air Force Base
Randolph Air Force Base
Laughlin Air Force Base
Goodfellow Air Force Base
Sheppard Air Force Base
Dyess Air Force Base
Brooks City Base
Biggs Army Airfield
Camp Bullis
Corpus Christi Army Depot
Fort Bliss
Fort Hood
Fort Sam Houston
Red River Army Depot
Corpus Christi Naval Air Station
Fort Worth Naval Air Station, Joint Reserve Base
Ingleside Naval Station
Galveston Coast Guard Station
[Governor Perry] also kicked all the FEMA people out of Galveston; sent back all federal highway funds; had all state universities return their federal grant money; agreed to close all National Weather Service stations in Texas; refunded federal Medicaid and Medicare funds; closed down all federal courts in the state; cancelled all federal defense contracts active in the state; asked the Border Patrol and INS to leave; said the State of Texas would now guaranty all the banks in the state; and closed all FBI offices in the state.
For some reason, however, he said the George W. Bush Presidential Library could stay.
by Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:51 am
Farnhamia wrote:greed and death wrote:Farnhamia wrote:I believe the question of secession was settled during the 1860s. It's not a viable threat.
You don't seem to live in Texas.
And violent resistance is always a viable threat.
Texas National Guard versus the US Army? That dog don't hunt. Or even better, fine, secede. The US withdraws all the military bases from Texas, the Johnson Space Center in Houston, and whatever else the Federal government funds. In fact, I found a little page out there that lists the things Texas would lose:Lackland Air Force Base
Randolph Air Force Base
Laughlin Air Force Base
Goodfellow Air Force Base
Sheppard Air Force Base
Dyess Air Force Base
Brooks City Base
Biggs Army Airfield
Camp Bullis
Corpus Christi Army Depot
Fort Bliss
Fort Hood
Fort Sam Houston
Red River Army Depot
Corpus Christi Naval Air Station
Fort Worth Naval Air Station, Joint Reserve Base
Ingleside Naval Station
Galveston Coast Guard Station
[Governor Perry] also kicked all the FEMA people out of Galveston; sent back all federal highway funds; had all state universities return their federal grant money; agreed to close all National Weather Service stations in Texas; refunded federal Medicaid and Medicare funds; closed down all federal courts in the state; cancelled all federal defense contracts active in the state; asked the Border Patrol and INS to leave; said the State of Texas would now guaranty all the banks in the state; and closed all FBI offices in the state.
For some reason, however, he said the George W. Bush Presidential Library could stay.
Can you say "economic wasteland"?
by Gift-of-god » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:57 am
by Farnhamia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:58 am
greed and death wrote:I guess the 58 fortune 500 companies that choose to headquarter in Texas(more then any other state) couldn't support the economy.
also Texas is a tax donor state which means all those federally funded programs you just listed could be provided by the state of Texas for less then the federal income taxes we would get out of.
by Sarzonia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:02 am
greed and death wrote:Farnhamia wrote:I believe the question of secession was settled during the 1860s. It's not a viable threat.
You don't seem to live in Texas.
And violent resistance is always a viable threat.
by Ostronopolis » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:09 am
by Sibirsky » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:11 am
by Sibirsky » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:12 am
Ostronopolis wrote:Well, hopefully the health care reforms fail, and this will be moot.
by Gift-of-god » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:12 am
by Sibirsky » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:15 am
Gift-of-god wrote:To me, this simply shows desperation.
"We can't come up with a good reason to stop these health care reforms, so we're just going to threaten secession instead."
by Farnhamia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:15 am
Gift-of-god wrote:To me, this simply shows desperation.
"We can't come up with a good reason to stop these health care reforms, so we're just going to threaten secession instead."
by Farnhamia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:16 am
Sibirsky wrote:Gift-of-god wrote:To me, this simply shows desperation.
"We can't come up with a good reason to stop these health care reforms, so we're just going to threaten secession instead."
And trying to push a thousand page bill in 2 weeks is not desperation? Setting unrealistic deadline is not desperation?
by Secruss » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:17 am
Gift-of-god wrote:The threat of secession is about as real as the threat of the free marketeers going Galt.
Let's not let imaginary fantasies get in the way of needed healthcare reform.
by Risottia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:19 am
greed and death wrote:First I am not advocating secession.
Anyways here is the scenario.
The majority of the red states lead by Texas threaten to secede from the union over health care and have taken steps that suggest they will follow through on it. Would it be worth continuing health care nationalization at the risk of a civil war or 1/3 the US leaving?
by Secruss » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:20 am
by Farnhamia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:20 am
Secruss wrote:Gift-of-god wrote:The threat of secession is about as real as the threat of the free marketeers going Galt.
Let's not let imaginary fantasies get in the way of needed healthcare reform.
by Ashmoria » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:21 am
greed and death wrote:First I am not advocating secession.
Anyways here is the scenario.
The majority of the red states lead by Texas threaten to secede from the union over health care and have taken steps that suggest they will follow through on it. Would it be worth continuing health care nationalization at the risk of a civil war or 1/3 the US leaving?
by Gift-of-god » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:21 am
Sibirsky wrote:And trying to push a thousand page bill in 2 weeks is not desperation?
Sibirsky wrote:Setting unrealistic deadline is not desperation?
by Eofaerwic » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:22 am
by The_pantless_hero » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:22 am
greed and death wrote:I guess the 58 fortune 500 companies that choose to headquarter in Texas(more then any other state) couldn't support the economy.
also Texas is a tax donor state which means all those federally funded programs you just listed could be provided by the state of Texas for less then the federal income taxes we would get out of.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!
by Opola » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:22 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Estado Novo Portugues, Europa Undivided, Risottia, Rogers scandanavia, Tillania, Vassenor
Advertisement