No room for due intellectual caution and qualification then. Enjoy that.
Advertisement
by The blessed Chris » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:03 am
by The blessed Chris » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:04 am
by DaWoad » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:32 am
by Farnhamia » Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:01 pm
DaWoad wrote:
Coterminous? As in covering the same area? . . . .well it would depend if the religious law and societal laws are essentially identical then there's absolutely no problem. If, on the other hand, societal laws contradict the religious ones in the same area then, in my opinion, societal laws trump every time. Can you explain why they shouldn't?
by Greater Phenia » Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:38 am
Sun Aut Ex wrote:Person012345 wrote:So you're against male circumcision too? I think Ifreann was making fun of the attitude that male circumcision is ok "because it happens all the time (in america)" and that female circumcision is bad because it doesn't. Y'know. Like sarcasm.
I only support male circumcision on minors if it's for medical reasons.
by DaWoad » Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:11 am
Farnhamia wrote:DaWoad wrote:
Coterminous? As in covering the same area? . . . .well it would depend if the religious law and societal laws are essentially identical then there's absolutely no problem. If, on the other hand, societal laws contradict the religious ones in the same area then, in my opinion, societal laws trump every time. Can you explain why they shouldn't?
You mean, besides making Baby Jesus cry?
I suppose by "coterminous" he meant in an area where everyone is of the same religion and there are no non-religious people there. In other words, CloudCuckooLand.
by Person012345 » Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:21 am
Greater Phenia wrote:Sun Aut Ex wrote:Person012345 wrote:So you're against male circumcision too? I think Ifreann was making fun of the attitude that male circumcision is ok "because it happens all the time (in america)" and that female circumcision is bad because it doesn't. Y'know. Like sarcasm.
I only support male circumcision on minors if it's for medical reasons.
I'm rather glad I didn't need your 'support' then. This is one 'victim' who's absolutely fine with his 'mutilation.'
by Glorious Homeland » Fri Jul 09, 2010 11:27 am
Greater Phenia wrote:Sun Aut Ex wrote:Person012345 wrote:So you're against male circumcision too? I think Ifreann was making fun of the attitude that male circumcision is ok "because it happens all the time (in america)" and that female circumcision is bad because it doesn't. Y'know. Like sarcasm.
I only support male circumcision on minors if it's for medical reasons.
I'm rather glad I didn't need your 'support' then. This is one 'victim' who's absolutely fine with his 'mutilation.'
by Otira » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:34 pm
by Drug Crazed Dropkick » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:48 am
Person012345 wrote:The fact is, not all parents are sensible, and you get dumbfuck parents who will cut open their kids penis even if something is likely to go wrong. Solution: Prevent parents forcing it on their kid. There is no reason for it (unless you do have a genuine medicinal reason for wanting to do so) so why should the parents be allowed to force their child to have it?
by NERVUN » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:24 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A m e n r i a, Aggicificicerous, Corporate Collective Salvation, Eahland, Foxyshire, Ifreann, La Xinga, New Ziedrich, The Astral Mandate, Umeria, Zantalio
Advertisement