NATION

PASSWORD

NIH wants to know

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Grave_n_idle » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:22 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote: And prohibit the women who bonked them from every getting any sort of public assistance for the rest of their natural lives. Those women need to be punished.
.


Ah, bad show.

Halfway convincing troll overplays it's hand. boo.

I dunno, I'm kinda liking the refuge in audacity. "These women go to nightclubs and have sex with other men sans the latex wall of spermicide, but would prefer that I rubber coat my John Thomas. Clearly everyone involved in this travesty of sexual justice except me needs to be removed from the gene pool".


Too fast, though. Too clumsy. It was rushed, and awkward and... peaked too quickly.

All the things that just scream 'virgin'!
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Nov 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:24 pm

They could be locked up for the rest of their lives. Do you realize how easy it is to get a kid to say someone touched them when no one actually touched them. And the ease of planting evidence. You can have a gang banger locked up in prison until the day he dies.
Land of Free Beer and the Home of the Kentucky Fried Chicken

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:26 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:They could be locked up for the rest of their lives. Do you realize how easy it is to get a kid to say someone touched them when no one actually touched them. And the ease of planting evidence. You can have a gang banger locked up in prison until the day he dies.


It's a shame I know what bullshit that is because if I didn't, I could jokingly suggest that the same trick would work on you.
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Nov 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:26 pm

Farnhamia wrote:I know, I mean, if I were male and really, really wanted to have sex with one of these women, I'd be the one bringing the condoms, assuming they're as bad as USofA- says.

Churlish troll passeth understanding, though it did allow him an opportunity to trot out the "sterilize the criminal!" crap.

All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.
Land of Free Beer and the Home of the Kentucky Fried Chicken

User avatar
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Nov 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:28 pm

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:They could be locked up for the rest of their lives. Do you realize how easy it is to get a kid to say someone touched them when no one actually touched them. And the ease of planting evidence. You can have a gang banger locked up in prison until the day he dies.


It's a shame I know what bullshit that is because if I didn't, I could jokingly suggest that the same trick would work on you.

If a person is a known gang banger, then no jury in this country is going to give him the time of day. Why? Because gang bangers are always claiming, "I didn't do it."
It's them against the evidence plus a child who claims the guy raped him. The jury always believes the child.
Land of Free Beer and the Home of the Kentucky Fried Chicken

User avatar
UNIverseVERSE
Minister
 
Posts: 3394
Founded: Jan 04, 2004
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby UNIverseVERSE » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:29 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.


No True Scotsman fallacy, right there.

Next?
Fnord.

User avatar
Treznor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7343
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Treznor » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:29 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I know, I mean, if I were male and really, really wanted to have sex with one of these women, I'd be the one bringing the condoms, assuming they're as bad as USofA- says.

Churlish troll passeth understanding, though it did allow him an opportunity to trot out the "sterilize the criminal!" crap.

All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.

Ah. I'm not a real American, then? I don't approve of children being convicted as pedophiles and then sterilized because of your concept of justice? I don't approve of criminals in general being subjected to sterilization as though it were a barbaric and inhumane practice?

This has ceased to be amusing.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Sdaeriji » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:30 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I know, I mean, if I were male and really, really wanted to have sex with one of these women, I'd be the one bringing the condoms, assuming they're as bad as USofA- says.

Churlish troll passeth understanding, though it did allow him an opportunity to trot out the "sterilize the criminal!" crap.

All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.


No True Scotsman fallacy.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Dread Lady Nathicana
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 26053
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:32 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:I don't undertand why people are ok with women passing on the genes of baby rapers.


As a wise philosopher once wrote: "Bored now!"


Thus, perchance? I mean, pics had to happen sooner or later. And his blathering -is- getting rather tedious.

Image

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112546
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:37 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I know, I mean, if I were male and really, really wanted to have sex with one of these women, I'd be the one bringing the condoms, assuming they're as bad as USofA- says.

Churlish troll passeth understanding, though it did allow him an opportunity to trot out the "sterilize the criminal!" crap.

All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.

I believe we have a Scotsman in the room.

No, my angry friend, all criminals should not be sterilized, including pedophiles. I will admit that the whole issue of punishing pedophiles - and continuing to punish them after they have served the mandated term for their offense - is very difficult for me to reconcile in my mind. Some pedophiles have done horrific things and should be punished harshly. I think imprisonment for the term of one's natural life is pretty harsh, given the usual fate of such people in prison. I do, however, think some can be rehabilitated and so should not be thrown away out of hand for one offense. Subsequent convictions should trigger an ascending scale of punishment.

But don't change the subject. You're the one running about here ranting about "nightclub girls" who screw "gangbangers" and have their children, all of whom should be sterilized.

And Curse you all you got in before me with the No True Scotsman!
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
JuNii
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13517
Founded: Aug 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby JuNii » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:43 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Why men dont like condoms.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06 ... e-condoms/

Your thoughts?

we don't? :blink:
on the other hand... I have another set of fingers.

Unscramble these words...1) PNEIS. 2)HTIELR 3) NGGERI 4) BUTTSXE
1) SPINE. 2) LITHER 3)GINGER 4)SUBTEXT

User avatar
Exilia and Colonies
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Dec 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Exilia and Colonies » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:43 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I know, I mean, if I were male and really, really wanted to have sex with one of these women, I'd be the one bringing the condoms, assuming they're as bad as USofA- says.

Churlish troll passeth understanding, though it did allow him an opportunity to trot out the "sterilize the criminal!" crap.

All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.


Pedophilia isn't illegal. Logic fail. :palm:
VEGAN IS SYMBOLIC OPPRESSION! STOP THE MURDER OF PLANTS! GO SUNLIGHT DIET!

User avatar
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Nov 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:47 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I know, I mean, if I were male and really, really wanted to have sex with one of these women, I'd be the one bringing the condoms, assuming they're as bad as USofA- says.

Churlish troll passeth understanding, though it did allow him an opportunity to trot out the "sterilize the criminal!" crap.

All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.

I believe we have a Scotsman in the room.

No, my angry friend, all criminals should not be sterilized, including pedophiles. I will admit that the whole issue of punishing pedophiles - and continuing to punish them after they have served the mandated term for their offense - is very difficult for me to reconcile in my mind. Some pedophiles have done horrific things and should be punished harshly. I think imprisonment for the term of one's natural life is pretty harsh, given the usual fate of such people in prison. I do, however, think some can be rehabilitated and so should not be thrown away out of hand for one offense. Subsequent convictions should trigger an ascending scale of punishment.

But don't change the subject. You're the one running about here ranting about "nightclub girls" who screw "gangbangers" and have their children, all of whom should be sterilized.

And Curse you all you got in before me with the No True Scotsman!

The fallacy applies because of the constantly shifting definition of American.
Land of Free Beer and the Home of the Kentucky Fried Chicken

User avatar
UnitedStatesOfAmerica-
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Nov 25, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby UnitedStatesOfAmerica- » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:49 pm

Exilia and Colonies wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I know, I mean, if I were male and really, really wanted to have sex with one of these women, I'd be the one bringing the condoms, assuming they're as bad as USofA- says.

Churlish troll passeth understanding, though it did allow him an opportunity to trot out the "sterilize the criminal!" crap.

All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.


Pedophilia isn't illegal. Logic fail. :palm:

Yes it is. If you like children, I'm have some friends who are federal agents who would love to have a talk with you.
Land of Free Beer and the Home of the Kentucky Fried Chicken

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Sdaeriji » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:51 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Yes it is. If you like children, I'm have some friends who are federal agents who would love to have a talk with you.


Perhaps you could cite the relevant law that prohibits pedophilia, as opposed to child molestation.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112546
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:52 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:All criminals should be sterilized. You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.

I believe we have a Scotsman in the room.

No, my angry friend, all criminals should not be sterilized, including pedophiles. I will admit that the whole issue of punishing pedophiles - and continuing to punish them after they have served the mandated term for their offense - is very difficult for me to reconcile in my mind. Some pedophiles have done horrific things and should be punished harshly. I think imprisonment for the term of one's natural life is pretty harsh, given the usual fate of such people in prison. I do, however, think some can be rehabilitated and so should not be thrown away out of hand for one offense. Subsequent convictions should trigger an ascending scale of punishment.

But don't change the subject. You're the one running about here ranting about "nightclub girls" who screw "gangbangers" and have their children, all of whom should be sterilized.

And Curse you all you got in before me with the No True Scotsman!

The fallacy applies because of the constantly shifting definition of American.

No ... You said no "real Americans" would oppose sterilizing pedophiles. I'm a real American and I oppose it.

Logical fallacy is logically falacious.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
JuNii
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13517
Founded: Aug 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby JuNii » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:57 pm

Sdaeriji wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Yes it is. If you like children, I'm have some friends who are federal agents who would love to have a talk with you.


Perhaps you could cite the relevant law that prohibits pedophilia, as opposed to child molestation.

don't forget Statuatory Rape... that also isn't Pedophilia...

but I'll admit there are some state laws about the possesion of Child Porn (which is not necessarily the depiction of a minor engaging in sex acts.)
on the other hand... I have another set of fingers.

Unscramble these words...1) PNEIS. 2)HTIELR 3) NGGERI 4) BUTTSXE
1) SPINE. 2) LITHER 3)GINGER 4)SUBTEXT

User avatar
Exilia and Colonies
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Dec 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Exilia and Colonies » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:58 pm

JuNii wrote:I'll admit there are some state laws about the possesion of Child Porn (which is not necessarily the depiction of a minor engaging in sex acts.)


Which again does not fall under the definition of "Sexual attraction to children"
VEGAN IS SYMBOLIC OPPRESSION! STOP THE MURDER OF PLANTS! GO SUNLIGHT DIET!

User avatar
Dread Lady Nathicana
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 26053
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:59 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Yes it is. If you like children, I'm have some friends who are federal agents who would love to have a talk with you.

I like children just fine. I work with them all year long in one of the local elementary schools. Nothing at all wrong with liking children - as children in a completely and utterly non-sexual manner such as I do. I've had my background check done. Have you? ;)

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112546
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:03 pm

Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Yes it is. If you like children, I'm have some friends who are federal agents who would love to have a talk with you.

I like children just fine. I work with them all year long in one of the local elementary schools. Nothing at all wrong with liking children - as children in a completely and utterly non-sexual manner such as I do. I've had my background check done. Have you? ;)

I like them fine but I'm always reminded of WC Fields' in Tillie and Gus (1933), when asked if he likes children, he utters his infamous line, "I do if they're properly cooked."
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
JuNii
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13517
Founded: Aug 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby JuNii » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:08 pm

Exilia and Colonies wrote:
JuNii wrote:I'll admit there are some state laws about the possesion of Child Porn (which is not necessarily the depiction of a minor engaging in sex acts.)


Which again does not fall under the definition of "Sexual attraction to children"

no, but those who are pediophiles can be caught in the broad definition of Child (I know it when I see it) Porn... even if they never touched a child in the not good in the eyes of the law way.
on the other hand... I have another set of fingers.

Unscramble these words...1) PNEIS. 2)HTIELR 3) NGGERI 4) BUTTSXE
1) SPINE. 2) LITHER 3)GINGER 4)SUBTEXT

User avatar
Dread Lady Nathicana
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 26053
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:11 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:
UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:Yes it is. If you like children, I'm have some friends who are federal agents who would love to have a talk with you.

I like children just fine. I work with them all year long in one of the local elementary schools. Nothing at all wrong with liking children - as children in a completely and utterly non-sexual manner such as I do. I've had my background check done. Have you? ;)

I like them fine but I'm always reminded of WC Fields' in Tillie and Gus (1933), when asked if he likes children, he utters his infamous line, "I do if they're properly cooked."

With fava beans and a nice chianti. :twisted:

Anyways, how in hell did this go from 'condoms: yes/no' to pedophilia, gangbangers, and who is or isn't a slut? Ye gods, the paths these threads do take!

User avatar
No true scotsman
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Feb 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby No true scotsman » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:12 pm

UnitedStatesOfAmerica- wrote:You'll be hard pressed to find any real Americans who oppose the sterilization of pedophiles for starters.


*groans, creaking, from his grave*

Did someone summon me?

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203930
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:13 pm

I know I asked this already, I am just baffled, but... is USofA being really really really serious with all this?! :blink:
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112546
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Re: NIH wants to know

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:I like children just fine. I work with them all year long in one of the local elementary schools. Nothing at all wrong with liking children - as children in a completely and utterly non-sexual manner such as I do. I've had my background check done. Have you? ;)

I like them fine but I'm always reminded of WC Fields' in Tillie and Gus (1933), when asked if he likes children, he utters his infamous line, "I do if they're properly cooked."

With fava beans and a nice chianti. :twisted:

Anyways, how in hell did this go from 'condoms: yes/no' to pedophilia, gangbangers, and who is or isn't a slut? Ye gods, the paths these threads do take!

Querceto 2006, a very nice chianti. :D The fava beans ... I like them but, well, know.

It went this way so USofA- could reroute the pretty overwhelming disapproval of his trollishness.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Infected Mushroom

Advertisement

Remove ads