by Sharania » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:10 pm
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:11 pm
by Pandeeria » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:13 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:15 pm
Pandeeria wrote:The fact that Hillary lost and that Sanders would've done better (according to polls) means that if the DNC starts to "wage war" on white privilege, then it will only further fuck itself, just a it has been doing with it's obsession of Neoliberal rather than progressive candidates.
by Nasjonale Regjering » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:15 pm
by Crockerland » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:16 pm
by Pandeeria » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:16 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Pandeeria wrote:The fact that Hillary lost and that Sanders would've done better (according to polls) means that if the DNC starts to "wage war" on white privilege, then it will only further fuck itself, just a it has been doing with it's obsession of Neoliberal rather than progressive candidates.
You *do* remember that Sanders put significantly more emphasis on social justice than Hillary did in the primaries, right?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:17 pm
Crockerland wrote:It'll be hard for them to wage war against something that doesn't exist.
by Grand Britannia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:18 pm
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:18 pm
Pandeeria wrote:He much more focused on issues relating to the poor and working class, rather than to any particular ethnicity, sex, religion, or race.
by New Grestin » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:I sure am enjoying my privilege of unemployment and being broke.
by Benuty » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm
by Dushan » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm
Sharania wrote:With rapid generational changes in all demographic groups across the country being an established fact, it’s obvious whom all these new voters will favor in future elections. Democratic Party needs no Sander’s “socialists” appealing to “class issues”. It needs no one from the dying breed of those, whom HRC called “a basket of deplorables” (and who are committed to the GOP). It is a given that to better represent all these future voters the Democrats must address one pressing issue – the White Privilege. It is my sincere belief that it will be addressed in the most straightforward way, paving a new path for both the party and the Republic.
The change of the party is in the air and there will be a new Democratic Party – and soon! A new kind of party, lead by people like Hakeem Jeffries. Human decency and universal progress, therefore, dictate that these relics of the past, beholden to their White Privilege with their reactionary and self-serving agenda get booted from office and a new team dedicated to push America forward instead of holding it back take over.
One question remains – when? 2018 (mid-terms)? Or 2020 (presidential)? Or maybe sometime later?
I say – the sooner the better. Trump’s administration must understand that they are on the wrong side of history, and should not have a moment of respite! He and his party represents the dead and shriveled hand holding back the real America of people from thousands backgrounds. Bill Moyers called the GOP “an enabler of death, the enemy of life, a threat to the republic itself”.
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:21 pm
Dushan wrote:"Wrong side of History"
So the coastal Starbucks-instagram campus elites who are now flooding the Streets protesting are the future of America? Apparently not.
And regarding "wrong side of History" i'd recommand this article: History strikes back
Besides there have been many Latinos, Muslims and Afro-Americans been voting for Donald Trump.
by Benuty » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:22 pm
Dushan wrote:Sharania wrote:With rapid generational changes in all demographic groups across the country being an established fact, it’s obvious whom all these new voters will favor in future elections. Democratic Party needs no Sander’s “socialists” appealing to “class issues”. It needs no one from the dying breed of those, whom HRC called “a basket of deplorables” (and who are committed to the GOP). It is a given that to better represent all these future voters the Democrats must address one pressing issue – the White Privilege. It is my sincere belief that it will be addressed in the most straightforward way, paving a new path for both the party and the Republic.
The change of the party is in the air and there will be a new Democratic Party – and soon! A new kind of party, lead by people like Hakeem Jeffries. Human decency and universal progress, therefore, dictate that these relics of the past, beholden to their White Privilege with their reactionary and self-serving agenda get booted from office and a new team dedicated to push America forward instead of holding it back take over.
One question remains – when? 2018 (mid-terms)? Or 2020 (presidential)? Or maybe sometime later?
I say – the sooner the better. Trump’s administration must understand that they are on the wrong side of history, and should not have a moment of respite! He and his party represents the dead and shriveled hand holding back the real America of people from thousands backgrounds. Bill Moyers called the GOP “an enabler of death, the enemy of life, a threat to the republic itself”.
"Wrong side of History"
So the coastal Starbucks-instagram campus elites who are now flooding the Streets protesting are the future of America? Apparently not. And regarding "wrong side of History" i'd recommand this article: History strikes back
Besides there have been many Latinos, Muslims and Afro-Americans been voting for Donald Trump.
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:24 pm
Benuty wrote:I don't even know how one can be on the wrong side of history. History is a complex chain of events not a collective consciousness with emotions. Sure history can often explain many things, but saying someone is "on the wrong side of history" is nonsense.
by Grand Britannia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:24 pm
by Pandeeria » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:24 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by New Grestin » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:26 pm
Dushan wrote:Besides there have been many Latinos, Muslims and Afro-Americans been voting for Donald Trump.
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)
by Sharania » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:26 pm
Nasjonale Regjering wrote:They won't. They're too busy "loving trumps hate" and none of them have weapons because the police exists but in an ironic twist they hate the police. That and they're basically the equivalent of Vichy France. They're the ones who surrendered, aren't doing anything because they're to scared of those superior to them.
by Benuty » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:27 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Benuty wrote:I don't even know how one can be on the wrong side of history. History is a complex chain of events not a collective consciousness with emotions. Sure history can often explain many things, but saying someone is "on the wrong side of history" is nonsense.
A river isn't a collective consciousness with emotions, but you can certainly be on the wrong side of that too. Seriously? Progress may not be linear in its development, but it is inevitable.
by Dark Triads » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:27 pm
by Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:28 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:What the hell is even "racially disadvantaged"
Pandeeria wrote:I don't think he did.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Ancientania, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kowani, Maxs Hair, Plan Neonie, Repreteop, Shidei, Tungstan
Advertisement