NATION

PASSWORD

When will the Dems start a War on a White Privilege?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Sharania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 837
Founded: Sep 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

When will the Dems start a War on a White Privilege?

Postby Sharania » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:10 pm

With rapid generational changes in all demographic groups across the country being an established fact, it’s obvious whom all these new voters will favor in future elections. Democratic Party needs no Sander’s “socialists” appealing to “class issues”. It needs no one from the dying breed of those, whom HRC called “a basket of deplorables” (and who are committed to the GOP). It is a given that to better represent all these future voters the Democrats must address one pressing issue – the White Privilege. It is my sincere belief that it will be addressed in the most straightforward way, paving a new path for both the party and the Republic.

The change of the party is in the air and there will be a new Democratic Party – and soon! A new kind of party, lead by people like Hakeem Jeffries. Human decency and universal progress, therefore, dictate that these relics of the past, beholden to their White Privilege with their reactionary and self-serving agenda get booted from office and a new team dedicated to push America forward instead of holding it back take over.

One question remains – when? 2018 (mid-terms)? Or 2020 (presidential)? Or maybe sometime later?

I say – the sooner the better. Trump’s administration must understand that they are on the wrong side of history, and should not have a moment of respite! He and his party represents the dead and shriveled hand holding back the real America of people from thousands backgrounds. Bill Moyers called the GOP “an enabler of death, the enemy of life, a threat to the republic itself”.
Time for justice.
Veteran of the Resistance.

BLM
Pigs are treyf

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:11 pm

"the White Privilege"

I get the feeling that this poster is being less than sincere.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:13 pm

The fact that Hillary lost and that Sanders would've done better (according to polls) means that if the DNC starts to "wage war" on white privilege, then it will only further fuck itself, just a it has been doing with it's obsession of Neoliberal rather than progressive candidates.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:15 pm

Pandeeria wrote:The fact that Hillary lost and that Sanders would've done better (according to polls) means that if the DNC starts to "wage war" on white privilege, then it will only further fuck itself, just a it has been doing with it's obsession of Neoliberal rather than progressive candidates.

You *do* remember that Sanders put significantly more emphasis on social justice than Hillary did in the primaries, right?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Nasjonale Regjering
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Oct 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Nasjonale Regjering » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:15 pm

They won't. They're too busy "loving trumps hate" and none of them have weapons because the police exists but in an ironic twist they hate the police. That and they're basically the equivalent of Vichy France. They're the ones who surrendered, aren't doing anything because they're to scared of those superior to them.

Theme of the Nasjonale Regjering's Armed Forces (På Vikingtog)
Alternate History Norway (Still under the Nasjonale Regjering control from 1940 to 1955)

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:16 pm

It'll be hard for them to wage war against something that doesn't exist.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:16 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:The fact that Hillary lost and that Sanders would've done better (according to polls) means that if the DNC starts to "wage war" on white privilege, then it will only further fuck itself, just a it has been doing with it's obsession of Neoliberal rather than progressive candidates.

You *do* remember that Sanders put significantly more emphasis on social justice than Hillary did in the primaries, right?


He much more focused on issues relating to the poor and working class, rather than to any particular ethnicity, sex, religion, or race.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Ebliania
Minister
 
Posts: 2285
Founded: Apr 17, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Ebliania » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:17 pm

Yeah, let's not.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:17 pm

Crockerland wrote:It'll be hard for them to wage war against something that doesn't exist.

"White privilege" is just a way of saying "Not disadvantaged on the basis of race" that got twisted and turned out of control by attention whores on the left and disingenuous individuals on the right.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Grand Britannia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:18 pm

I sure am enjoying my privilege of unemployment and being broke.
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:18 pm

Pandeeria wrote:He much more focused on issues relating to the poor and working class, rather than to any particular ethnicity, sex, religion, or race.

He did. But he still focused more on ethnic, gender, religious, and racial issues more than Hillary did at the time.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
New Grestin
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9500
Founded: Dec 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Grestin » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm

With the way the DNC acted during this election, any "war" they try to wage will probably consist of them repeatedly shooting themselves in the foot and then getting upset when people point it out.
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers
Kentucky Fried Land wrote:I should have known Grestin was Christopher Walken the whole time.
ThePub wrote:New Grestin: "I will always choose the aborable lesbians over an entire town."
Imperial Idaho wrote:And with 1-2 sentences Grestin has declared war on the national pride of Canada.
- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:I sure am enjoying my privilege of unemployment and being broke.

This is exactly what I'm talking about.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37334
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm

This reads like a bunch of bullshit from the young cucks....I mean genocide denialist news group the young turks.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Dushan
Minister
 
Posts: 2272
Founded: Feb 17, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dushan » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:19 pm

Sharania wrote:With rapid generational changes in all demographic groups across the country being an established fact, it’s obvious whom all these new voters will favor in future elections. Democratic Party needs no Sander’s “socialists” appealing to “class issues”. It needs no one from the dying breed of those, whom HRC called “a basket of deplorables” (and who are committed to the GOP). It is a given that to better represent all these future voters the Democrats must address one pressing issue – the White Privilege. It is my sincere belief that it will be addressed in the most straightforward way, paving a new path for both the party and the Republic.

The change of the party is in the air and there will be a new Democratic Party – and soon! A new kind of party, lead by people like Hakeem Jeffries. Human decency and universal progress, therefore, dictate that these relics of the past, beholden to their White Privilege with their reactionary and self-serving agenda get booted from office and a new team dedicated to push America forward instead of holding it back take over.

One question remains – when? 2018 (mid-terms)? Or 2020 (presidential)? Or maybe sometime later?

I say – the sooner the better. Trump’s administration must understand that they are on the wrong side of history, and should not have a moment of respite! He and his party represents the dead and shriveled hand holding back the real America of people from thousands backgrounds. Bill Moyers called the GOP “an enabler of death, the enemy of life, a threat to the republic itself”.


"Wrong side of History"

So the coastal Starbucks-instagram campus elites who are now flooding the Streets protesting are the future of America? Apparently not. And regarding "wrong side of History" i'd recommand this article: History strikes back

Besides there have been many Latinos, Muslims and Afro-Americans been voting for Donald Trump.
Martial Nation on a far distant world with SciFi and Fantasy elements.

Factbook
This Nation does not use NS stats. When RPing with nation of different TL, we adapt to it.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:21 pm

Dushan wrote:"Wrong side of History"

So the coastal Starbucks-instagram campus elites who are now flooding the Streets protesting are the future of America? Apparently not.

I had no idea they were so numerous.

Cowards who fear the outside world and shy away from protests aren't the future of America. We are.
And regarding "wrong side of History" i'd recommand this article: History strikes back

Don't start that bullshit again. It completely misses the point of the phrase, but I guess attacking what your opponents actually say and do is unpopular in this era of post-truth politics.
Besides there have been many Latinos, Muslims and Afro-Americans been voting for Donald Trump.

So?
Last edited by Conserative Morality on Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37334
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:22 pm

Dushan wrote:
Sharania wrote:With rapid generational changes in all demographic groups across the country being an established fact, it’s obvious whom all these new voters will favor in future elections. Democratic Party needs no Sander’s “socialists” appealing to “class issues”. It needs no one from the dying breed of those, whom HRC called “a basket of deplorables” (and who are committed to the GOP). It is a given that to better represent all these future voters the Democrats must address one pressing issue – the White Privilege. It is my sincere belief that it will be addressed in the most straightforward way, paving a new path for both the party and the Republic.

The change of the party is in the air and there will be a new Democratic Party – and soon! A new kind of party, lead by people like Hakeem Jeffries. Human decency and universal progress, therefore, dictate that these relics of the past, beholden to their White Privilege with their reactionary and self-serving agenda get booted from office and a new team dedicated to push America forward instead of holding it back take over.

One question remains – when? 2018 (mid-terms)? Or 2020 (presidential)? Or maybe sometime later?

I say – the sooner the better. Trump’s administration must understand that they are on the wrong side of history, and should not have a moment of respite! He and his party represents the dead and shriveled hand holding back the real America of people from thousands backgrounds. Bill Moyers called the GOP “an enabler of death, the enemy of life, a threat to the republic itself”.


"Wrong side of History"

So the coastal Starbucks-instagram campus elites who are now flooding the Streets protesting are the future of America? Apparently not. And regarding "wrong side of History" i'd recommand this article: History strikes back

Besides there have been many Latinos, Muslims and Afro-Americans been voting for Donald Trump.


I don't even know how one can be on the wrong side of history. History is a complex chain of events not a collective consciousness with emotions. Sure history can often explain many things, but saying someone is "on the wrong side of history" is nonsense.
Last edited by Benuty on Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:24 pm

Benuty wrote:I don't even know how one can be on the wrong side of history. History is a complex chain of events not a collective consciousness with emotions. Sure history can often explain many things, but saying someone is "on the wrong side of history" is nonsense.

A river isn't a collective consciousness with emotions, but you can certainly be on the wrong side of that too. Seriously? Progress may not be linear in its development, but it is inevitable.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Grand Britannia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:24 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:I sure am enjoying my privilege of unemployment and being broke.

This is exactly what I'm talking about.


What the hell is even "racially disadvantaged"
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:24 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:He much more focused on issues relating to the poor and working class, rather than to any particular ethnicity, sex, religion, or race.

He did. But he still focused more on ethnic, gender, religious, and racial issues more than Hillary did at the time.


I don't think he did.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
New Grestin
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9500
Founded: Dec 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Grestin » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:26 pm

Dushan wrote:Besides there have been many Latinos, Muslims and Afro-Americans been voting for Donald Trump.

And evidently those groups have no concept of self-preservation, given that they apparently voted for a slack-jawed corporate sockpuppet who campaigned on deliberately disenfranchising them.
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers
Kentucky Fried Land wrote:I should have known Grestin was Christopher Walken the whole time.
ThePub wrote:New Grestin: "I will always choose the aborable lesbians over an entire town."
Imperial Idaho wrote:And with 1-2 sentences Grestin has declared war on the national pride of Canada.
- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)

User avatar
Sharania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 837
Founded: Sep 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Sharania » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:26 pm

Nasjonale Regjering wrote:They won't. They're too busy "loving trumps hate" and none of them have weapons because the police exists but in an ironic twist they hate the police. That and they're basically the equivalent of Vichy France. They're the ones who surrendered, aren't doing anything because they're to scared of those superior to them.


Did you just Nazi-Named the Democrats?
Time for justice.
Veteran of the Resistance.

BLM
Pigs are treyf

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37334
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:27 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Benuty wrote:I don't even know how one can be on the wrong side of history. History is a complex chain of events not a collective consciousness with emotions. Sure history can often explain many things, but saying someone is "on the wrong side of history" is nonsense.

A river isn't a collective consciousness with emotions, but you can certainly be on the wrong side of that too. Seriously? Progress may not be linear in its development, but it is inevitable.

I have to disagree.

A month from now we could experience a civilization level shattering event, and be flung violently back to who knows when.

600 years your descendants assuming you lived through the event could be worshipping the founding fathers, and use guns objects of worship.

Shit happens.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Dark Triads
Secretary
 
Posts: 31
Founded: Dec 06, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dark Triads » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:27 pm

They could always end the war on drugs which can be considered to be a 'war on blacks' of a sort. Too bad corporations profiting from the US's prison-industrial complex would effectively lose its cheap workforce as a result.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:28 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:What the hell is even "racially disadvantaged"

Being a member of a race that suffers significant collective unequal treatment at the hands of society. Like being seen as lazy, criminal, and violent if you're black.
Pandeeria wrote:I don't think he did.

Are you fucking kidding me? Did you even pay attention to the Dem primaries? After August he came out swinging on social justice issues while Hillary tried to avoid that and focus on her strong points.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Ancientania, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kowani, Maxs Hair, Plan Neonie, Repreteop, Shidei, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads