Advertisement
by Maichuko » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:27 pm
by Sassanidia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:29 pm
Maichuko wrote:Amazing how Trump supporters are still running those Hillary attack adds. iv'e seen three different ones today alone on whether she should be indited or some "secret corruption" i haven't heard about. he won she admitted he won. They should accept that he's not actually going to do anything to the Clinton's.
by Maichuko » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:30 pm
Sassanidia wrote:Maichuko wrote:Amazing how Trump supporters are still running those Hillary attack adds. iv'e seen three different ones today alone on whether she should be indited or some "secret corruption" i haven't heard about. he won she admitted he won. They should accept that he's not actually going to do anything to the Clinton's.
He can't because it's not within his power. It's up to the FBI and Attorney General- who COULD appoint a special prosecutor- he however cannot. He's not going to "let her off the hook" or pardon her. Try harder next time.
by The Lone Alliance » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:39 pm
by Maichuko » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:54 pm
The Lone Alliance wrote:So apparently the recount in Wisconsin... is giving Trump even more votes than before...
I don't think this is working as people expected...
by San Lumen » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:54 pm
The Lone Alliance wrote:So apparently the recount in Wisconsin... is giving Trump even more votes than before...
I don't think this is working as people expected...
by Grand Britannia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:58 pm
by Eol Sha » Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:36 pm
Sassanidia wrote:Maichuko wrote:Amazing how Trump supporters are still running those Hillary attack adds. iv'e seen three different ones today alone on whether she should be indited or some "secret corruption" i haven't heard about. he won she admitted he won. They should accept that he's not actually going to do anything to the Clinton's.
He can't because it's not within his power. It's up to the FBI and Attorney General- who COULD appoint a special prosecutor- he however cannot. He's not going to "let her off the hook" or pardon her. Try harder next time.
by Liriena » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:05 am
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Vassenor » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:20 am
The Lone Alliance wrote:So apparently the recount in Wisconsin... is giving Trump even more votes than before...
I don't think this is working as people expected...
by Vassenor » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:27 am
by Liriena » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:28 am
Sassanidia wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Wallenburg » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:33 am
TheBlaze is a multiplatform news and entertainment network available on television, radio and the Internet founded by conservative talk radio personality and entrepreneur Glenn Beck.
by Sassanidia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:36 am
by Vassenor » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:56 am
Sassanidia wrote:
http://heavy.com/news/2016/12/wisconsin ... ules-laws/
Here's ANOTHER website that sites the wisconsin board of elections website, also included.
http://elections.wi.gov/publications/st ... preadsheet
Like I dont know what spin you think there is on hard numbers, but sorry you dont agree with the site's politics.
by Sassanidia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:03 am
Vassenor wrote:Sassanidia wrote:http://heavy.com/news/2016/12/wisconsin ... ules-laws/
Here's ANOTHER website that sites the wisconsin board of elections website, also included.
http://elections.wi.gov/publications/st ... preadsheet
Like I dont know what spin you think there is on hard numbers, but sorry you dont agree with the site's politics.
Let.me know when he's made up all the 2.5 million he said would be needed for his win to be legitimate.
by Uiiop » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:04 am
Sassanidia wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Let.me know when he's made up all the 2.5 million he said would be needed for his win to be legitimate.
The point of the recount isn't to make up 2 and a half million votes- he's not even the one calling for a recount, Hillary and Jill are. idk why you think HE'S personally trying to steal 2.5 million votes through a recount he doesnt even want in states he already won. Like first my source was biased, which means you refused to believe it, then suddenly I show you the raw numbers and those numbers aren't "enough"
by Vassenor » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:04 am
Sassanidia wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Let.me know when he's made up all the 2.5 million he said would be needed for his win to be legitimate.
The point of the recount isn't to make up 2 and a half million votes- he's not even the one calling for a recount, Hillary and Jill are. idk why you think HE'S personally trying to steal 2.5 million votes through a recount he doesnt even want in states he already won. Like first my source was biased, which means you refused to believe it, then suddenly I show you the raw numbers and those numbers aren't "enough"
by Sassanidia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:06 am
Uiiop wrote:Sassanidia wrote:The point of the recount isn't to make up 2 and a half million votes- he's not even the one calling for a recount, Hillary and Jill are. idk why you think HE'S personally trying to steal 2.5 million votes through a recount he doesnt even want in states he already won. Like first my source was biased, which means you refused to believe it, then suddenly I show you the raw numbers and those numbers aren't "enough"
The hell was him ranting about Illegals then? Just Bants?
by Vassenor » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:09 am
by Sassanidia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:18 am
Vassenor wrote:Sassanidia wrote:Is he the one calling the recount? Who's the one sueing for recounts in all of these states? Not him.
So that justifies his set of tirades as he tries to rationalise the idea that he isn't as unconditionally loved as he thought? Or that his opinion in a person being elected president without winning the popular vote changed so fast it'd give you whiplash?
by Uiiop » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:20 am
by The Lone Alliance » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:30 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Google [Bot], Grandocantorica, Ineva, Keltionialang, La Paz de Los Ricos, Neu California, New haven america, Prion-Cirus Imperium, Shrillland, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Lone Alliance, Tiami, Trollgaard, Tungstan, Vrbo
Advertisement