Novsvacro wrote:Merizoc wrote:You're misinterpreting my point. Language is an indicator of ancestry, and one of the key components of culture. Is it the be all end all? No, of course not. But someone whose parents are Chinese, speak Chinese, and are the kids of chinese immigrants probably has a better claim to the label "Chinese" than a dude who works in a New York pizzeria, has ancestors who've been living in the US further than he can trace, and doesnt speak a lick of Italian has a claim to the "Italian" label.
I think it would still be fair for him to call himself Italian-American, though. I've adopted a lot of stereotypically Italian habits and so on that aren't actually Italian, including Italian-American words derived from English. Germanese instead of Aleman (or Tedesco), tichetta instead of biglietto, and gabagool instead of capicola.
Aren't you sort of proving my point that "identifying" with some far off ancestry is rather meaningless?